• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bowe Bergdahl, once missing U.S. soldier, charged with desertion

Only that's not even close to what happened here. In case you didn't read the thread, I suggest you do. It'll stop you from looking silly.

Was it not Obama the first to announce while standing in the rose garden that he made this exchange with his parents present. I'm I wrong in that. Am I wrong that Rice said he served this country with extension. Both Obama and Rice are ****ing idiots. I don't give a damn how you want to spin it as you are a true Obama loyalist, even for a deserter through his actions got 6 of our great service men killed. He should be hanged.
 
Only that's exactly what they did as already proven by MMC. Remember these facts were known in 2010 and were published by the mainstream media, the quotes I posted were from 2011, 2013 and 2014.

Could you please provide a quote from Sarah Palin, Allen West, John McCain, or any other republicans you listed quotes from on page 1, that were made after the trade that support your assertion that their opposition was to Bergdahl being brought home, as opposed to the deal that Obama made to do so?
 
Yep, as soon as you answer these demands for information:

You are the one who attacked republicans and I say your attack was a lie.

Our discussion started based on your attacks. All you have to do is provide one quote made by one of those republicans after the trade was made that backs up your post on page 1, and I will be glad to answer all the questions you've asked me on this thread...

You have my word on that.
 
You are the one who attacked republicans and I say your attack was a lie.

Good, and I asked you for information 10 pages ago. You completely refused and just went on a rant about, well whatever nonsense you usually rant about that I just ignore. When you're willing to post it, you can come back and make demands of your own. I can wait as long as I have to. :)
 
Sure, find the post,

Well here's a thread I created after I watched MSNBC's Chris Hayes attack conservatives and Fox News over what he called the hypocrisy of "...regular, rank and file conservatives, completely changing their tune on Bergdahl", citing there "backlash to the decision to bring Bo Bergdahl home."

He posted the before and after tweets from 5 conservative that he claimed was proof that they wanted him to be brought home before, and objected to Bergdahl being brought home after... Just like you are claiming.

I proved his accusations were false, which is why no matter what, you will never provide the quote I asked for because it doesn't exist. You are playing the same dishonest game Hayes was, therefore you will never even attempt to substanciate your lie.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/bias-...and-dishonesty-msnbcs-chris-hayes-w-85-a.html
 
Good, and I asked you for information 10 pages ago. You completely refused and just went on a rant about, well whatever nonsense you usually rant about that I just ignore. When you're willing to post it, you can come back and make demands of your own. I can wait as long as I have to. :)

I notice you left off the part about giving you my word... But it doesn't matter because you lied, so you can't post proof of something that does not exist.

Your attack was a lie, and in fine liberal fashion, you will stand by your lie. That's just what progressives like yourself do.
 
Well here's a thread I created after I watched MSNBC's Chris Hayes attack conservatives

This is so patently dishonest it's almost funny. This is what you claimed you did:

Grim17 said:
I've addressed this before, back when the trade happened.

In regards to this:

Only that's exactly what they did as already proven by MMC. Remember these facts were known in 2010 and were published by the mainstream media, the quotes I posted were from 2011, 2013 and 2014.

There is absolutely NOTHING in your post about anything I cited, hell even on Oliver North, Chris Hayes called him a hypocrite not for his position, BUT HIS ACTIONS. Which shows you to be wrong even in the OTHER thread because I don't think you actually watched the video. If you are going to waste my ****ing time like this, why even bother?

I notice you left off the part about giving you my word...

I don't give a **** about your word. I asked you to post evidence. You're welcome to do so and then demand others provide you with proof of their own. :)
 
I think Obama thought he could kill two birds with one stone here.

He could release 5 dangerous Terrorist from Gitmo, which would be a good start to closing it and Americans and the Military would embrace Bo Bergdahl as a Soldier that served with " Honor and distinction ".

But the Military didn't play ball and have now decided to charge him with desertion which makes Obama look bad.

I wonder who in the Military is going to pay for their insolence over this ?
 
This is so patently dishonest it's almost funny. This is what you claimed you did:



In regards to this:



There is absolutely NOTHING in your post about anything I cited, hell even on Oliver North, Chris Hayes called him a hypocrite not for his position, BUT HIS ACTIONS. Which shows you to be wrong even in the OTHER thread because I don't think you actually watched the video. If you are going to waste my ****ing time like this, why even bother?



I don't give a **** about your word. I asked you to post evidence. You're welcome to do so and then demand others provide you with proof of their own. :)

As I said, you lied and therefore can not provide a quote that backs up your attack, because no such quote exists.

Attacking me is the only option you have.

In case you or anyone else is interested, the panel discussion on Special Report talked about this, and they really nailed it.

"Special Report" Panel" Reacts To Bergdahl Charges | Video | RealClearPolitics
 
As I said,

Lmao, you're getting desperate. You stated you addressed the quotes I mentioned. Yet when you provided the "evidence", there's not a single thing about anything I posted. Tell us again how you addressed them Grim17? :lol:
 
This is utter bull**** for that soldier, we'll have to see what happens, will be following this closely.

no it's not, desertion in wartime is a huge offense.
 
Lmao, you're getting desperate. You stated you addressed the quotes I mentioned. Yet when you provided the "evidence", there's not a single thing about anything I posted. Tell us again how you addressed them Grim17? :lol:

Still can't muster up the courage to admit you lied... That's OK, everyone knows you did by how you can't even address my asking you to provide a quote to substanciate you bull.

We need people like you to show America what being a progressive really stands for... so you keep on lying, and I'll keep on pointing it out when you do.
 
Still can't muster up the courage to admit you lied.

You're getting desperate Grim17, first you claim you addressed the quotes in question. Then when I go into the thread you provided, there is NOTHING about them on it. If you're going to be that desperate to claim you proved something, you should just stop before you actually have to come up with proof for everything else I asked for. It will be a LONG day for you.
 
I think Obama thought he could kill two birds with one stone here.

He could release 5 dangerous Terrorist from Gitmo, which would be a good start to closing it and Americans and the Military would embrace Bo Bergdahl as a Soldier that served with " Honor and distinction ".

But the Military didn't play ball and have now decided to charge him with desertion which makes Obama look bad.

I wonder who in the Military is going to pay for their insolence over this ?



Mornin Fenton. :2wave: Well you have to remember a couple weeks ago. BO peep said his biggest regret was he didn't close Gitmo.....as he wanted all those who were considered the worst of the worst. Free and able to attack Americans and their Interests.

What else could be his excuse. If that was his biggest regret knowing only the worst of the worst was left there.

One thing is certainly clear.....he has increased the Risk of Harm upon the National Security of the US, of every American overseas, and any of our Business interests outside the country.

Something he should be made to answer for and to suffer consequences over it.
 
Greetings, MMC. :2wave:

Thanks for keeping us updated on the background on this case - many people, me included, were not aware of much of this information. All we knew was that he apparently deliberately made the decision to walk away from his post, which apparently is the truth. It will remain to be seen how this will be handled by all concerned.

Don't thank him too much. He's basically lying to you.
 
1A65DC22-16DC-49F5-B579-42AC07467DFC_zpsqtbe3dqq.jpg

So all liberals have made both those claims? Or are we taking another spin down the information superhackway?
 
So all liberals have made both those claims? Or are we taking another spin down the information superhackway?



Of course not all liberals, but those on your side, have done exactly what's pictured, and I don't recall anyone on your side correcting them, perhaps I am wrong.
 
Obama traded 5 terrorist leaders and 6 marines for his miserable SOB that will soon be hanging from a rope.
Reality is Bergdahl even if found guilty will not face a death sentence and even in the unlikely case of being sentenced to the maximum, it will be life in prison - he'll probably be eligible for parole after much less time. More likely is he will face a minimum or just a dishonorable. If he does get jail time, I would think Obama would consider exonerating Bergdahl on his way out of office.

And the left can't understand why rational people don't trust the dumb SOB Obama on the Iran nuke deal?
The left will protect Obama regardless of the potential damage he has and will continue to inflict by the White House's incompetence and world view. It's the new norm. There are little to no reasonable Democrats left and those that are, will not stay or will not run for Congress.
 
Lol@Republicans.

Sarah Palin Quote - Statement is not wrong based on the new information, nor does it condone the swap Obama ultimately did

Allen West quote - Statement is not wrong based on the new information. The second part is question with regards to the swap. He suggested there's been no indication from Obama about trying to get Bergdahl back wihtout a way to have media "highlights" regarding it. Well, he did take action to get him back...and there were ways of making it a "media highlight", by propping him up as a hero who served with "distinction and honor". At the time of the comment however, publicly, West was correct in his impression

John McCain quote - Statement is not wrong based on the new information. Clearly indicated he'd need to know the details, but in general he'd support ways of bringing him home. And that an exchange would be something to consider. If I say I would consider selling my house as a means of dealing with my debt, that doesn't mean I agree with you offering me $10 for it. His comment absolutely gives him reasonable wiggle room to still be critical of the actual deal.

Kelly Ayotte quote - Statement is not wrong based on new information, however it does condone the swap Obama ultimately did. Ayotte claimed that they should do "all [they] can" to find and bring him home. A swap of 5 prisoners is part of "all they can". If she complained about the swap, she was being rather hypocritical.

James Inhofe quote - Ditto to the above

Jim Hoft - Statement isn't changed by the desertion news, but is in terms of whether or not Obama was ultimately going to lave him behind. Does not really give an indication of "any means necessary" type approach, so doesn't automatically means based on this quote that he should agree with the actual swap.

Michele Malkin - Prior to the desertion news really even permeating any line of media, and again doesn't really indicate in any way that she'd have to agree with the Obama deal.

Rich Nugent - Nothing contradictory based on the desertion news, but like Ayotte and Inhofe, he'd be a hypocrite if he criticized the deal to get Bergdahl after claiming we should do "everthing possible" to retrieve left behind soldires.

Susan Rice Quote - Absolutely is contradicted given the news of him being guilty of desertion. A deserted is not one who served with "honor"

-edit-

My above post was in error in terms of the notion of desertion. For some reason I thought he had previously been charged, and this was the conviction. Susan Rice's comment thus is questionable, not clearly contradicted, as he's not been found guilty of desertion at this point.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom