- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Cool story, bro.
What.....you know you didn't understand it at all. :lamo
Cool story, bro.
What.....you know you didn't understand it at all. :lamo
Oh come on now.....that's now when Your Traitor went missing. Do you need to recheck dates?
Again what Part about Republican changings their stance after news was released can't you figure out? Oh wait......it took you 6 years to figure out why an opposing party does what it needs to do against the party of Sell outs. :roll:
... It does... what it needs to do? In other words... flip flop?
Referring to the twice-elected president of the United States as "your Obama" doesn't make you appear clever or witty.
Looking at most of your responses.....you don't have any room to talk. That's not just in this thread either. Imagine that! :lamo
... It does... what it needs to do? In other words... flip flop?
It puts the lotion on its skin!
Heya Pero :2wave:.....the left isn't to bright on such finite details such as that. Oh and they can't seem to find a couple of them in Qatar. Wonder what happened to BO peep keeping tabs on them?
If they are missing in Qatar.....did BO peep fail again?
Are you quite done?
It was asinine to let them go in the first place.
You got a link or anything that gives you any credit as to know what you are talking about? Something.....anything, other than your deflection that is.
We don't know his story.
A shameless liar like Obama needs to surround himself with other shameless liars like Runaround Sue. Holder is another damned slimy liar. And Obama's former Secretary of State is as dishonest as President Pinocchio himself. Like him, she can stand right before the cameras and lie through her teeth with a straight face. Neither of them has the least bit of honor, and they both have been flagrant liars throughout their shabby, undistinguished political careers.
What have I stated in this thread that you need a link to clarify?
You don't really expect Hatuey to not enter into hackery do you?
It would clarify that you know what you are talking about, rather than your usual with the affront or talking about another whom you know nothing about.
Oh yeah, and then its play with word terminology and definitions. Look for that one word for an out. The usual.
You can't really show evidence for any of this can you? First you claim that it was known that Berghdal deserted. You can't show evidence of anybody knowing the truth. Then you claim that his platoon members knew. Yet all the evidence points to them coming forward AFTER Berghdal was returned. Now, you claim that Obama knew, yet there is absolutely nothing to validate that other than... he knew, they knew everyone knew. I'll hold my breath until you come up with something tangible?
Link to the specific post(s) that require clarification, or kindly go find another tree up which to bark.
Semantic Cowboys.
Why don't you try and talk about how you think you are clever and witty some more. While I have shown you aren't even close nor have such a capability. :lol:
You haven't shown anything. Go bother someone else.
I just got done showing your pal how he was wrong with his date and when BO peep knew something. As usual that reality you couldn't keep up with.
So now if you can't stay on topic. You know where else you can take it. I have no trouble there either.
Lol@Republicans.
Pointing at the other party when you've got nothing else to argue makes you look like you don't have an argument.