• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ted Cruz going on Obamacare

Hey....you don't offend me. You amuse me.

And Ted amuses me. I'm happy as hell to see him jump into the fray. He blasted out of the gates making me laugh with his blatant pandering. I expect an almost nonstop festival of stupid from him till the day he drops out.
 
Still waiting.

Oh....Still waiting....Okaaayy.

Ummmm....hmmm....

Tsk...

I guess you'll just have to keep on waiting if you didn't understand me the first time. Too bad.
 
One thing is for sure. He is going to look pretty ridiculous harping on the Affordable Care Act while being on it. :roll:

He looks pretty ridiculous all the time.
 
For going to such lengths...for bringing up such inconsequential things...for trying to spin such things to ridicule a person you don't like.

And then...for veering off topic because your efforts are failing.

Yeah...I'm laughing at you.

But seriously, Ted Cruz is a nut on many progressive issues.
 
What a dork chump Ted Cruz is. I love this answer he gave when asked what kind of music he liked.

So on a question asking about music, he evoked 9/11 saying he was a classic rock fan until 9/11. Then and ONLY then did he switch to country music because he didn't like the way the rock genre responded to 9/11...

If only my biggest concern about Obama was his taste in music.
 
Oh....Still waiting....Okaaayy.

Ummmm....hmmm....

Tsk...

I guess you'll just have to keep on waiting if you didn't understand me the first time. Too bad.

You can read my other posts within the thread if you enjoy intelligent conversation.
 
And you refuse to address points made against you, instead talking about how "amusing" the others side is while not addressing it in any intelligent way. 10/10

From your actions in this thread, it's obvious you wouldn't know an intelligent way if it bit you in the ass.

That's another reason you are so amusing.
 
If only my biggest concern about Obama was his taste in music.

At least Obama is progressive on women's rights, gay rights, climate change.. Ted Cruz isn't. Simple.
 
Let me apply some Republican logic to this... "SEEE!!!!! I hate him so looky how divisive he is!!!11!!!!!"

btw... he's the dork that talked about his music. Sorry if showing what he said offended you.

It was one of those difficult, partisan questions like what do you read?
 
From your actions in this thread, it's obvious you wouldn't know an intelligent way if it bit you in the ass.

That's another reason you are so amusing.

You just keep doing what I say you are guilty of, please, have some decency and respond with actual answers apart from ad hominem statements.
 
Ted's announcement was comedy gold. He goes to LIBERTY University where the students were forced under threat of a fine to attend. But the gold stars go to the kids behind him that were wearing the "I stand with RAND" shirts.

TedCruz-700x357.jpg
 
Well, folks.

I'm bored with the liberals/progressives/socialists/Democrats in this thread. It's has about as much fun and illumination as the typical Palin thread...meaning, not much.

But I know how much you guys depend on your ridicule, spin, how did that other member put it??...ah, yes...your "rhetoric of destruction". I won't put a damper on your fun and games. It's all about as relevant as a circle jerk, after all.

Toodles....


Edit...

And don't forget to get your parting shots in on me. You know you want to. Just do it.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I'm a bum who can't support myself, obviously. In the real world, countries with socialist policies and democracies work amazingly well, socialist states usually do not, as the ones in existence lack the proper democratic processes and stability. I would love a democratic socialist state, but I will attest to socialist leaning policies, which work.

My comment was not about you or success, but about servitude to the collective. Do keep up. The man in your avatar was a bum and a complete and utter moron. If you like we can go over Das Kapital line by line and I will prove that it is complete gibberish and the biggest pile of bull**** ever written.
 
My comment was not you or success, but about servitude to the collective. Do keep up. The man in your avatar was a bum and a complete and utter moron.

A prominent German intellectual who contributed great ideas was a bum. You obviously know all about Karl Marx.
 
Well, folks.

I'm bored with the liberals/progressives/socialists/Democrats in this thread. It's has about as much fun and illumination as the typical Palin thread...meaning, not much.

But I know how much you guys depend on your ridicule, spin, how did that other member put it??...ah, yes...your "rhetoric of destruction". I won't put a damper on your fun and games. It's all about as relevant as a circle jerk, after all.

Toodles....

Hilarious. Now go and join one of the zillion threads of conservative faux ODS rage and pretend like this post isn't hypocritical.
 
Well, folks.

I'm bored with the liberals/progressives/socialists/Democrats in this thread. It's has about as much fun and illumination as the typical Palin thread...meaning, not much.

But I know how much you guys depend on your ridicule, spin, how did that other member put it??...ah, yes...your "rhetoric of destruction". I won't put a damper on your fun and games. It's all about as relevant as a circle jerk, after all.

Toodles....

You're the one at fault, you fail to show why we're "laughable"
 
I think it's a plot by the GOP hierarchy to make the rest of the field look normal .

Well, folks.

I'm bored with the liberals/progressives/socialists/Democrats in this thread. It's has about as much fun and illumination as the typical Palin thread...meaning, not much.

But I know how much you guys depend on your ridicule, spin, how did that other member put it??...ah, yes...your "rhetoric of destruction". I won't put a damper on your fun and games. It's all about as relevant as a circle jerk, after all.

Toodles....


Edit...

And don't forget to get your parting shots in on me. You know you want to. Just do it.
 
A prominent German intellectual who contributed great ideas was a bum. You obviously know all about Karl Marx.

I know everything about the man from the way he lived, the content of all his books, to the absolutely pathetic way he debated and defended his ideas. The man didn't know the first thing about human nature, economics or freedom. He was a complete moron.
 
I know everything about the man from the way he lived, the content of all his books, to the absolutely pathetic way he debated and defended his ideas.

Then you know it's a shame his ideas were taken and twisted, and he himself would not want to attribute himself as a "Marxist." His ideas really spoke towards capitalism, and what debates are we on about? Give me some background on these.
 
I know everything about the man from the way he lived, the content of all his books, to the absolutely pathetic way he debated and defended his ideas. The man didn't know the first thing about human nature, economics or freedom. He was a complete moron.

Really now? He knew nothing on economics or freedom? Have you read any of his literature? Keep in mind his writings were done in the 1800's and are extremely progressive for there time.
 
Then you know it's a shame his ideas were taken and twisted, and he himself would not want to attribute himself as a "Marxist." His ideas really spoke towards capitalism, and what debates are we on about? Give me some background on these.

It makes no difference who twisted his ideas or why they did it. They were bad before they were ever twisted and they were bad after they were twisted. His system can't possibly occur in a free means and if anything has been proven true about socialism no matter if it is mixed with capitalism or not is that it is incapable with freedom.
 
Really now? He knew nothing on economics or freedom? Have you read any of his literature? Keep in mind his writings were done in the 1800's and are extremely progressive for there time.

His ideas were not new. Rehashing old debunked theories and calling them by new names is not progressive. Then again, that term has never described new ideas, so I guess it's neither here nor there.
 
It makes no difference who twisted his ideas or why they did it. They were bad before they were ever twisted and they were bad after they were twisted. His system can't possibly occur in a free means and if anything has been proven true about socialism no matter if it is mixed with capitalism or not is that it is incapable with freedom.

You're a liar, I'm sorry but you are. Countries around the world with very socialist leanings and policies have just as much freedom as we do, if not more, depending on what you measure. How are they bad? He simply commentates on his idea of an ideal society, due to the way capitalism operates. How is socialism incapable with freedom anyways, giving the means of production to the people? Democratic socialism?
 
His ideas were not new. Rehashing old debunked theories and calling them by new names is not progressive. Then again, that term has never described new ideas, so I guess it's neither here nor there.

Which debunked theories did he rehash? Also, he vigorously supported women's rights, talked down on religion, criticized capitalism.. I don't know where he rehashed his literature and commentary from, mind showing me a source?
 
Back
Top Bottom