• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.N. Opens New Investigation Into Crash That Killed Dag Hammarskjold

JANFU

Land by the Gulf Stream
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
59,034
Reaction score
38,583
Location
Best Coast Canada
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/17/w...h-that-killed-dag-hammarskjold.html?ref=world

When he was there, Mr. Southall said, he heard a recording of a voice speaking over the sound of an aircraft engine: “I see a transport plane coming low. All the lights are on. I’m going down to make a run on it. Yes, it’s the Transair DC6. It’s the plane.”

Then came the sound of canon fire, he said, and the voice spoke again, this time with more animation: “I’ve hit it. There are flames. It’s going down. It’s crashing.”
 
What possible motive did the US have for this? 2 people loosely affiliated to US intel coming out with their stories 50 years after the incident with absolutely 0 corroborating evidence proves nothing.

Interview on ground witnesses after 54 years??!?!!
 
What possible motive did the US have for this? 2 people loosely affiliated to US intel coming out with their stories 50 years after the incident with absolutely 0 corroborating evidence proves nothing.
2 US Intelligence officers, "loosely affiliated" now that is a stretch.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/17/w...h-that-killed-dag-hammarskjold.html?ref=world

An inquiry by Rhodesian civil aviation authorities soon after the crash found that the plane was on a normal approach route to the airport but had descended too low, and that neither pilot error nor foul play could be ruled out. A Rhodesian public inquiry in 1962 also cited low altitude. A separate United Nations inquiry the same year reviewed a range of possible causes without pinpointing one factor.

But a United Nations panel reviewing the case in 2013 found that there was “persuasive evidence that the aircraft was subjected to some form of attack or threat as it circled to land at Ndola.”
 
2 US Intelligence officers, "loosely affiliated" now that is a stretch.

Read your own article:

Charles Southall, now 80, was a naval aviator in 1961, working at a signals intelligence base in Cyprus.

Pilot, not CIA, not NSA, not even Naval intel.

Paul Henry Abram, now 73, was a Russian-speaking Air Force expert on loan to the National Security Agency

Contractor, not NSA.

But hey better 50 years late than never eh? :roll:

I bet if you put your mind to it you can find far more than 2 people loosely affiliated with US intelligence 50 years after the fact who will claim they witnessed little green men too.
 
Read your own article:

Charles Southall, now 80, was a naval aviator in 1961, working at a signals intelligence base in Cyprus.

Pilot, not CIA, not NSA, not even Naval intel.

Paul Henry Abram, now 73, was a Russian-speaking Air Force expert on loan to the National Security Agency

Contractor, not NSA.

But hey better 50 years late than never eh? :roll:

I bet if you put your mind to it you can find far more than 2 people loosely affiliated with US intelligence 50 years after the fact who will claim they witnessed little green men too.

And oddly enough even 50 years later the truth can somehow surface.
Did I state that it was shot down, no, but information does have a way of surfacing.

We have seen that time and again.
But back in those day as it is today, it was about wealth and resources.
 
And oddly enough even 50 years later the truth can somehow surface.
Did I state that it was shot down, no, but information does have a way of surfacing.

We have seen that time and again.
But back in those day as it is today, it was about wealth and resources.

Given a long enough time scale you can find 2 people loosely affiliated with US intelligence (sample population in the millions) who will claim just about anything. You haven't provided evidence, you haven't even provided compelling testimony.
 
Because there is nothing more worthwhile going on in the world for them to spend their time and money on.

:)
 
Back
Top Bottom