• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership [W:251]

Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership - Bloomberg Politics

President Obama: "It's somewhat ironic seeing some members of Congress wanting to make common cause with the hardliners in Iran..... It's an unlikely coalition."

Interesting. Seems to me, the President distorts the issue for political gain and is subtly trying to claim that Republicans are fraternizing with the enemy or perhaps even treasonous. And yet no reaction or condemnation from Democrats or their friends in the media. Rudy Guilliani states that he believes that President Obama doesn't love his country and all hell breaks lose, the full force of the Democrat party and their media puppets attacking with all force. But when the shoe is on the other foot, again the attack is on the Republican party and the Democrat media protects their saviour and master.

Interesting. Also, isn't President Obama trying to 'make common cause with the hardliners in Iran" through the deal negotiations he's involved in?

The letter to Iran was very misguided and should have been sent to the WH instead, or at best, it could have been a simple statement coming from Congress, to be observed by Iran. Surely they are watching. Right?
And they are watching now, seeing a POTUS making a fool of himself while criticizing those he reprimands for having made fools of themselves.
What a conceded man he is
 
Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership - Bloomberg Politics

President Obama: "It's somewhat ironic seeing some members of Congress wanting to make common cause with the hardliners in Iran..... It's an unlikely coalition."

Interesting. Seems to me, the President distorts the issue for political gain and is subtly trying to claim that Republicans are fraternizing with the enemy or perhaps even treasonous. And yet no reaction or condemnation from Democrats or their friends in the media. Rudy Guilliani states that he believes that President Obama doesn't love his country and all hell breaks lose, the full force of the Democrat party and their media puppets attacking with all force. But when the shoe is on the other foot, again the attack is on the Republican party and the Democrat media protects their saviour and master.

Interesting. Also, isn't President Obama trying to 'make common cause with the hardliners in Iran" through the deal negotiations he's involved in?

The letter to Iran was very misguided and should have been sent to the WH instead, or at best, it could have been a simple statement coming from Congress, to be observed by Iran. Surely they are watching. Right?
And they are watching now, seeing a POTUS making a fool of himself while criticizing those he reprimands for having made fools of themselves.
What a conceded a...
 
Obama should have blasted himself.

... lets add one more very relevant act by a liberal Senator that should shut them up for good.


According to Pajamas Media columnist Michael Ledeen, in 2008, a Democratic senator sent a personal emissary to Tehran encouraging the mullahs not to sign an agreement with the outgoing Bush Administration as negotiations would take on a much friendlier tone following President Bush’s departure from office.

Senator Obama's 2008 Message to Iran Undermines Condemnation of GOP Letter - Breitbart





The actual strategy is detente first, and then a full alliance with Iran throughout the Middle East and North Africa. It has been on display since before the beginning of the Obama administration. During his first presidential campaign in 2008, Mr. Obama used a secret back channel to Tehran to assure the mullahs that he was a friend of the Islamic Republic, and that they would be very happy with his policies. The secret channel was Ambassador William G. Miller, who served in Iran during the shah’s rule, as chief of staff for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and as ambassador to Ukraine. Ambassador Miller has confirmed to me his conversations with Iranian leaders during the 2008 campaign.

Obama’s Latest Big Lie: ‘We Have No Strategy’ | Faster, Please!

Here is the author of the above discussing this back channel communication with Mark Levin.




Information found through The Conservative Treehouse.

2008 Candidate Senator Obama Sent U.S. Secret Emissary To Iran Telling Them Not To Negotiate With George Bush – Said Wait For Him To Be Elected…. | The Last Refuge
 
All countries commit war crimes during war, stop acting like your **** doesn't stink. It's the hypocrisy.

The Bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima weren't " war crimes ".

Your butt hurt over America's existence is AGAIN, compromising your ability to make rational rebuttals.

Maybe if you picked up a History book once in a while instead of obsessing over America you wouldn't make such ridiculous dim whitted assertions.
 
Re: Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership

All you had to do was look at the body count chart to see that the after math of troop withdrawal wasn't nearly as bloody as it was before.
The body counts are simply too complicated to analyze because most deaths, and who caused them, go unreported. Keep in mind this is a war zone in Iraq, a country not known for its efficiency with paperwork.
Sorry but I don't really consider the CNS a credible source.
Where do you find the credibility problem?
Are you aware that there weren't any terrorists in Iraq before the invasion....but because of the war now there are?
That.s untrue and if you have a problem with the credibility of CNS then you should sign off from whoever told you that whopper. In fact you should keep in mind that Saddam Hussein was a terrorist regime.
Bush still gets the credit for the invasion that opened the can of worms we now call ISIS.
Does it really need to be explained again that Obama called Iraq a success? Perhaps you can watch him mouth the words himself and understand what actually happened. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKSb2ukQxvY
 
The letter to Iran was very misguided and should have been sent to the WH instead, or at best, it could have been a simple statement coming from Congress, to be observed by Iran. Surely they are watching. Right?
And they are watching now, seeing a POTUS making a fool of himself while criticizing those he reprimands for having made fools of themselves.
What a conceded man he is


Oh, we are only seeing the surface of this guy's conceit. he would throw his grandmother under a chain saw if it meant two points in the polls. Typically, he cannot see his own convoluted logic, nor that his excuses merely underscore how totally inept he really is.

The letter was overkill, I grant that. But sending it to the White House, in the hostile environment Obama has created results in what? A quick rebuff, likely off the mark as he tees up for another round. Sending it to Iran tells Iran the majority congress, they who sign the checks, are not rolling over. In the climate of "enemies" and "traitors" Obama's slime have created, they can be forgiven.

Besides, they got what they wanted. What are we talking about and would we had they merely said "hey White House, we hate the deal!"
 
Dear Lord. Mark Levin!!!!!! Have you no shame??
Shame?
For what?
He isn't the focus of the information.

The columnist's (Michael Ledeen) conversation with Ambassador William G. Miller and what he did on Obama's behalf is.


But way to try and deflect away from the provided information.
:thumbs:

:doh
 
Dear Lord. Mark Levin!!!!!! Have you no shame??
Where's the problem? We know Obama said he was going to be more 'flexible' with Putin after the election. Why not the same with Iran? Certainly withdrawing the troops from the Middle East didn't result in any Iranian protests.
 
The Bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima weren't " war crimes ".

Your butt hurt over America's existence is AGAIN, compromising your ability to make rational rebuttals.

Maybe if you picked up a History book once in a while instead of obsessing over America you wouldn't make such ridiculous dim whitted assertions.

It's not just an assertion.
 
Where's the problem? We know Obama said he was going to be more 'flexible' with Putin after the election. Why not the same with Iran? Certainly withdrawing the troops from the Middle East didn't result in any Iranian protests.

I was speaking of the great one, not Obama.
 
Shame?
For what?
He isn't the focus of the information.

The columnist's (Michael Ledeen) conversation with Ambassador William G. Miller and what he did on Obama's behalf is.


But way to try and deflect away from the provided information.
:thumbs:

:doh

No problem with the content. But that dudes name.
 
So you responded to the Levin clip without understanding what was on it? There is a pattern here.

No......follow nice and slowly, I made a comment about Levin, that's it....., nothing more. I don't know what you're trying to see in that.
 
No......follow nice and slowly, I made a comment about Levin, that's it....., nothing more. I don't know what you're trying to see in that.
Actually you made a comment about the poster, saying this.

"Dear Lord. Mark Levin!!!!!! Have you no shame??"

So you don't know what Mark Levin had to say and yet you questioned whether the poster has any shame? There is definitely a pattern here.
 
The Republicans were supposed to trust the judgement of a idiot that released five terrorist leaders for one US islamic sympathizing deserter that should be hanging from a rope?
 
Re: Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership

That is clearly unprovable and a foolishly wild speculation. The fact is that the real problems began once the troops were removed and that is not debatable..

It's basic logic that many had to foresight to predict before Bush invaded. And the troops were always going be to removed. There was too much unwelcomeness for anything else. Thing for a moment. There had to be some acceptance of us for this to be like other occupations. We never had that and never would. There was no way around this.
 
Re: Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership

It's basic logic that many had to foresight to predict before Bush invaded. And the troops were always going be to removed. There was too much unwelcomeness for anything else. Thing for a moment. There had to be some acceptance of us for this to be like other occupations. We never had that and never would. There was no way around this.

All DoD planners assumed a robust residual US force remaining indefinitely.
 
Actually you made a comment about the poster, saying this.

"Dear Lord. Mark Levin!!!!!! Have you no shame??"

So you don't know what Mark Levin had to say and yet you questioned whether the poster has any shame? There is definitely a pattern here.

I do know Mark Levin and his neocon perch. He shouldn't be mentioned as an authority for anything.
 
Re: Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership

It's basic logic that many had to foresight to predict before Bush invaded. And the troops were always going be to removed. There was too much unwelcomeness for anything else. Thing for a moment. There had to be some acceptance of us for this to be like other occupations. We never had that and never would. There was no way around this.

Let the DOD planners, the guys that retire to defense contractor jobs tell it, and we should have kept a residual force in Iraq indefinitely, lol. :roll:
 
Re: Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership

Let the DOD planners, the guys that retire to defense contractor jobs tell it, and we should have kept a residual force in Iraq indefinitely, lol. :roll:
Thus is not unusual. There are US Military bases spread around the world, many since WWII, and all with SOFA agreements.
 
Re: Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership

Thus is not unusual. There are US Military bases spread around the world, many since WWII, and all with SOFA agreements.

Thanks for expounding my point.
 
Re: Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership

All DoD planners assumed a robust residual US force remaining indefinitely.

That makes them fools. It was never going to happen. It required more than residual troops; the place required significant numbers of troops, which will never happen with a democracy.
 
Back
Top Bottom