• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama emailed Clinton at private address, didn’t know ‘details’ of account

Meadowlark said:
Hillary should address this issue instead of letting it fester, hold a press conference answer all the questions particularly if she is innocent and it's not a big deal as the liberals are saying.
Click to expand...

She is.....tomorrow moved it up from Friday.
 
pbrauer said:
How would they reach him if his email account is secret?
Click to expand...

Gee, I don't know, pb. The internet is the most secure place in the world, I know. Nobody ever can get in somewhere that they aren't supposed to be on the internet.
 
tres borrachos said:
Gee, I don't know, pb. The internet is the most secure place in the world, I know. Nobody ever can get in somewhere that they aren't supposed to be on the internet.
Click to expand...
I get the sarcasim, but you made me think of another point. There are ways of faking the incoming address so seeing the domain name is no assurance that it is correct. They must have another way of identifying themselves such as a password that changes daily.
 
pbrauer said:
Nope today, after she finishes her speech at the UN.
Click to expand...

Yeah I got it up in the other thread.....and the UN placed more restrictions with Press access. Which means if they didn't have in their 24 hr notice.


No American Press will be given access.
 
Meadowlark said:
Hillary should address this issue instead of letting it fester, hold a press conference answer all the questions particularly if she is innocent and it's not a big deal as the liberals are saying.
Click to expand...



It is what 'should' be, yes. But for her, it is the worst possible strategy. At this point, she does not know what her tormentors know. She could in 'coming clean' either fail to answer an issue correctly, add fuel inadvertently, or open an entirely new line of investigation.

Hillary and her paid staff are well aware this is a long game. It is to the Republicans advantage to spread this out over two years. It is also to the Obama camps advantage as well as every other wannabe's to have it drag out, so long as it does not spread to the Oval Office.

So the best strategy now is nothing. Wait. Let it die from the headlines and see what has legs and what doesn't. It the attention span of the voter is any indication, she has them on her side
 
Fearandloathing said:
It is what 'should' be, yes. But for her, it is the worst possible strategy. At this point, she does not know what her tormentors know. She could in 'coming clean' either fail to answer an issue correctly, add fuel inadvertently, or open an entirely new line of investigation.

Hillary and her paid staff are well aware this is a long game. It is to the Republicans advantage to spread this out over two years. It is also to the Obama camps advantage as well as every other wannabe's to have it drag out, so long as it does not spread to the Oval Office.

So the best strategy now is nothing. Wait. Let it die from the headlines and see what has legs and what doesn't. It the attention span of the voter is any indication, she has them on her side
Click to expand...


You are correct. She would never hold a press conference and answers questions. It doesn't matter who calls her out, Democrats or Republicans she will remain steadfast with hope this will fade away.

I do enjoy watching the other side accepting what she did, while Dianne Feinstein would not.
 
Grant said:
What's remarkable is that Obama doesn't regard Hillary Clinton as a private citizen, or even subject to the laws of the land.

Obama, in an interview with CBS aired Sunday, continued to stand by his claims that “the policy of my administration is to encourage transparency… and that's why my emails -- the BlackBerry that I carry around -- all those records are available and archived and I'm glad that Hillary has instructed that those emails that had to do with official business need to be disclosed.” They are acting under Hillary's instructions?

And you're right that there is still more to the story. Paper Tigress - WSJ
Click to expand...

Releasing the emails is nothing more than whitewashing the issue. The issue is the fact that she violated federal law in simply having the email address and doing business through it. The very fact that it existed is the issue, not whether the emails are released. There's no question that the emails should be released, but having them on a private server should be the center of the discussion and not whether she releases them of if there are gaps in them. All of this is secondary to the core issue of her even having the account in the first place. But what will happen is every discussion will get turned to "Well, she released the emails, so everything is hunky-dory"
 
Meadowlark said:
You are correct. She would never hold a press conference and answers questions. It doesn't matter who calls her out, Democrats or Republicans she will remain steadfast with hope this will fade away.

I do enjoy watching the other side accepting what she did, while Dianne Feinstein would not.
Click to expand...

I have been saying the support of the Obama democrats her included, has been blind.

It is knee jerk reaction, a hasty snap-to to defend before realizing the consequences. Look how many threads with negative news about Obama and co and now Hillary get a first response annoyingly dismissing the evidence, only to comment on how "conservatives' are trying to 'destroy the presidency."

There is no real defense of anything until all is known. Feinstien is the first, and a mild rebuke it is as she did not put any urgency as to time.

It is when others start to emerge who appear to undermine her, that is when it is clear her support is unraveling. She has been the front runner for seven years and now it appears others want a shot at it, and, as we have seen, the Democrats eat their young...
 
Gaius46 said:
You assume he typed the email himself and if he did you assume that he manages his email account's address book. Neither is a good assumption. Busy executives often delegate that work to others.
Click to expand...

I didn't assume anything-the presidents own spokesperson says OBAMA emailed HILLARY.

We now know that Hillary NEVER used a govt email server.
 
US Conservative said:
I didn't assume anything-the presidents own spokesperson says OBAMA emailed HILLARY.

We now know that Hillary NEVER used a govt email server.
Click to expand...



A nerve has definitely been hit here; now they are ignoring/denying even what has been admitted.

This is looking more and more like Watergate every hour
 
Meadowlark said:
Hillary should address this issue instead of letting it fester, hold a press conference answer all the questions particularly if she is innocent and it's not a big deal as the liberals are saying.
Click to expand...

She just held one, all she said was she should have had a state dept email address.
 
pbrauer said:
I get the sarcasim, but you made me think of another point. There are ways of faking the incoming address so seeing the domain name is no assurance that it is correct. They must have another way of identifying themselves such as a password that changes daily.
Click to expand...

Im sure there its high security, which is another reason why Hillary having her own servers is ridiculous. Hillary cares more about hiding her emails from Americans than she does about the foreign hackers/nations that got into her email.

This is the modern democrat party you support, pete.
 
Fearandloathing said:
I have been saying the support of the Obama democrats her included, has been blind.

It is knee jerk reaction, a hasty snap-to to defend before realizing the consequences. Look how many threads with negative news about Obama and co and now Hillary get a first response annoyingly dismissing the evidence, only to comment on how "conservatives' are trying to 'destroy the presidency."

There is no real defense of anything until all is known. Feinstien is the first, and a mild rebuke it is as she did not put any urgency as to time.

It is when others start to emerge who appear to undermine her, that is when it is clear her support is unraveling. She has been the front runner for seven years and now it appears others want a shot at it, and, as we have seen, the Democrats eat their young...
Click to expand...

This is why its so dangerous-theres a mob of gruberites out there (some seen in this thread) who know nothing about govt, ethics, etc blindly supporting a corrupt group of politicians.

What could go wrong?
 
US Conservative said:
Im sure there its high security, which is another reason why Hillary having her own servers is ridiculous. Hillary cares more about hiding her emails from Americans than she does about the foreign hackers/nations that got into her email.

This is the modern democrat party you support, pete.
Click to expand...
:lamo Those foreign hackers would first need to know what her domain was. Plus all those emails sent to the government are saved on government servers.
 
US Conservative said:
This is why its so dangerous-theres a mob of gruberites out there (some seen in this thread) who know nothing about govt, ethics, etc blindly supporting a corrupt group of politicians. What could go wrong?
Click to expand...
And they don't seem to realize that letting politicians get away with behavior sets a precedent for all future politicians. We can ask ourselves how such obvious hucksters like Al Sharpton can get away with their lies and over-the-top behavior but we can see the Clintons and Obama doing the same thing, though on a more sophisticated, and dangerous, level.

They know they'll have their Gruberites defending them no matter what they say or do.
 
US Conservative said:
This is why its so dangerous-theres a mob of gruberites out there (some seen in this thread) who know nothing about govt, ethics, etc blindly supporting a corrupt group of politicians.

What could go wrong?
Click to expand...



Indeed!

47% x "stupid voter" x Obama image making = ?

Eight years of blame.
 
Two damned America-hating commie liars--peas in a pod. To hell with both of them.
 
pbrauer said:
:lamo Those foreign hackers would first need to know what her domain was. Plus all those emails sent to the government are saved on government servers.
Click to expand...

There's a old Gmail trick you can use if you DON'T want your Emails to wind up in someone else's In Box.

Here's how it works'. You set up a private Email domain and give everyone you're going to be communicating with the password to get into the account.

Then you write your Email and then instead of sending it' you put it in drafts.

Then all those people that have access to your account can go in and read the Emails that are for them IN DRAFTS and then delete them when they're done.

No Emails ever get sent but everyone gets their Emails and there is no trail.
 
pbrauer said:
:lamo Those foreign hackers would first need to know what her domain was. Plus all those emails sent to the government are saved on government servers.
Click to expand...

Pete, the the hackers DID know what her domain was, even her personal email, they did this at least 2 years ago-thats how we know what her email is. And they also released the contents of some of those emails. Why dont you know this stuff yet?

And btw, if one foreign hacker could do this, I have no doubt China or Russias hackers could as well.

Obama on Clinton’s Emails
Hillary Clinton's 'hacked' Benghazi emails: FULL RELEASE ? RT USA

Had security experts checked the system, they might not have liked what they saw. One security scan this week revealed that Hillary’s domain uses “obsolete and insecure” protocols and gave it an overall F rating.
Click to expand...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...cret-email-was-a-cyberspy-s-dream-weapon.html
 
Last edited:
pbrauer said:
:lamo Those foreign hackers would first need to know what her domain was. Plus all those emails sent to the government are saved on government servers.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you should note that there are 4 countries the US knows hacks into our systems. This is what they do and are trained to do. Go after Diplomats correspondence. Any Communications.

Did you forget the Pentagon was hacked. The White House was hacked, what Happened? It wasn't funny then, huh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom