Page 10 of 19 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 187

Thread: Obama Says Nuclear Deal Offered to Iran Is ‘Extraordinarily Reasonable’ [W:170]

  1. #91
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama Says Nuclear Deal Offered to Iran Is ‘Extraordinarily Reasonable’

    Quote Originally Posted by Chainsaw View Post
    Are you really going to tell me you didn't support Kerry in '04? Remember his opening 'war hero' line, he saluted the camera and said ' reporting for duty'. That was one of the biggest political screw-ups in history, right there with Dukakis in the tank. He reminded me of MASH/Frank Burns applying for a Purple Heart after getting an egg-shell in his eye.
    I support independents, and once RP.
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  2. #92
    Si vis pacem, para bellum
    Μολὼν λαβέ's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Seen
    09-29-17 @ 11:22 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    6,914

    Re: Obama Says Nuclear Deal Offered to Iran Is ‘Extraordinarily Reasonable’

    Quote Originally Posted by Chainsaw View Post
    Then why should rational people blindly trust Obama on such an important world issue?

    The letter to Iran said the exact same thing your war-hero John Kerry said in a PUBLIC hearing, ie the Obama agreement would not be legally binding. So Kerry should be charged with treason too?
    So I must ask.... What good is a non-binding agreement?

    Why trust at their word, in addition to Saudi Arabia, the most prolific state sponsor of terrorism on the globe?
    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Generalizations are stupid.
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post
    The Second Amendment has nothing to do with guns.

  3. #93
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama Says Nuclear Deal Offered to Iran Is ‘Extraordinarily Reasonable’

    Quote Originally Posted by Μολὼν λαβέ View Post
    So I must ask.... What good is a non-binding agreement?

    Why trust at their word, in addition to Saudi Arabia, the most prolific state sponsor of terrorism on the globe?
    What do you mean non-binding agreement?
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  4. #94
    Si vis pacem, para bellum
    Μολὼν λαβέ's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Seen
    09-29-17 @ 11:22 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    6,914

    Re: Obama Says Nuclear Deal Offered to Iran Is ‘Extraordinarily Reasonable’

    Quote Originally Posted by Montecresto View Post
    What do you mean non-binding agreement?
    How would an agreement be binding?
    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Generalizations are stupid.
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post
    The Second Amendment has nothing to do with guns.

  5. #95
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama Says Nuclear Deal Offered to Iran Is ‘Extraordinarily Reasonable’

    Quote Originally Posted by Μολὼν λαβέ View Post
    How would an agreement be binding?
    World powers have been in talks to begin lifting UN sanctions against Iran if a deal is reached in upcoming nuclear discussions, media sources said. A UN resolution would make the deal binding, bypassing recently voiced objections in the US Senate.

    http://rt.com/news/240277-iran-sanctions-lift-talks-us/
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  6. #96
    Educator Chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Last Seen
    10-04-16 @ 03:54 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    790

    Re: Obama Says Nuclear Deal Offered to Iran Is ‘Extraordinarily Reasonable’

    Quote Originally Posted by Montecresto View Post
    World powers have been in talks to begin lifting UN sanctions against Iran if a deal is reached in upcoming nuclear discussions, media sources said. A UN resolution would make the deal binding, bypassing recently voiced objections in the US Senate.

    P5+1 in ?secret talks? to lift Iran sanctions if nuclear deal reached ? report ? RT News
    So the UN lifts all sanctions, but it still allows Iran to continue to research and develop nuclear fuel and technology, based on some BS non-legally binding agreement Obama puts together where the Iranians promise to be good and play nice. Then all of a sudden one day Iran announces it has and tests a nuke bomb. Do you really think the UN will be able to re-impose sanctions or any other penalty AFTER Iran goes nuclear?

    Russia and China both sit on the US SC and both want Iran to go nuclear so they can continue to sell them tech and material.
    The Gruber-crat is strong in this one!

  7. #97
    Sage

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Texas, Vegas, Colombia
    Last Seen
    11-28-16 @ 06:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    20,295

    Re: Obama Says Nuclear Deal Offered to Iran Is ‘Extraordinarily Reasonable’

    Quote Originally Posted by JANFU View Post
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/09/wo...html?ref=world




    Next month or so?
    What happens after 10 years?
    I'll withhold judgement of the deal until we get to see what the terms are.... but I'm skeptical simply because I don't trust Obama's definition of "reasonable", and he' hasn't really proven himself to be very good at the whole foreign policy thing.

    in any event, we're just spectators in the game... simple serfs watching the lords play their games.

  8. #98
    Educator Chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Last Seen
    10-04-16 @ 03:54 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    790

    Re: Obama Says Nuclear Deal Offered to Iran Is ‘Extraordinarily Reasonable’

    Quote Originally Posted by Montecresto View Post
    Because the partisan is blind! Neither Obama or any other president should be blindly trusted. And you know what, they shouldn't be trusted with eyes wide open either. All leadership from the top down should be held accountable, regulated, scrutinized, archived, monitored and verified by the real rational people, those with fidelity to America and her constitution, not partisan hacks who can't be trusted either. Btw, what makes you think Kerry's my war hero, I despise war!
    Obama is not just bowing to the ayatollahs, he is on his knees.

    As nuke talks intensify, WH celebrates Iranian holiday | TheHill
    The Gruber-crat is strong in this one!

  9. #99
    Living in Gods country


    JANFU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    17,885

    Re: Obama Says Nuclear Deal Offered to Iran Is ‘Extraordinarily Reasonable’

    Quote Originally Posted by American View Post
    Probably lacks logic.
    Nope.
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenton View Post
    Hillary is the only defense I or anyone else needs.
    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Not once have I showed my dick to a woman and she thought it was creepy. In fact, in 100% of the cases, they were pretty excited about it. I don't know who you're showing your **** too.

  10. #100
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama Says Nuclear Deal Offered to Iran Is ‘Extraordinarily Reasonable’

    Quote Originally Posted by Chainsaw View Post
    So the UN lifts all sanctions, but it still allows Iran to continue to research and develop nuclear fuel and technology, based on some BS non-legally binding agreement Obama puts together where the Iranians promise to be good and play nice. Then all of a sudden one day Iran announces it has and tests a nuke bomb. Do you really think the UN will be able to re-impose sanctions or any other penalty AFTER Iran goes nuclear?

    Russia and China both sit on the US SC and both want Iran to go nuclear so they can continue to sell them tech and material.
    No, if the security council were to pass a UNSCR, it would be binding.
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

Page 10 of 19 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •