- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 17,927
- Reaction score
- 10,822
- Location
- Washington State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
The apologists are out in force on this issue!
It is a dire indicator.
The Washington Post was THE paper that led the Watergate probe and caused the congressional hearings.
Neat.
Too bad she only tuned 55,000 (hand selected) of them over to the State Department. The emails reside of her server.
She's putting the State Department under the gun here. Nice deflection, Secretary Clinton.
There is no strategy. I asked you to validate a claim. You've been unable to. That's not a strategy, that's you being unable to prove your suspicions; and let's face it. That's all they are.
None of that actually matters, though. The assumption from the beginning was of guilt, regardless of what facts did or didn't exist. The assumption that she did something with her privilege to use her personal email for emergencies would have existed regardless, just as the assumption is that she absolutely, definitely will delete or doctor any emails before handing them over.
The apologists are out in force on this issue!
Yeah, I don't think it can played off as it is nothing. Nor something that it will be brushed off. Like I mentioned before....this could affect other people who she was talking to.
She has the MS media coming at her plus Gowdy and having to testify for Benghazi.....if this is done Right. She can be destroyed now and be forced to cop a plea deal and admitting guilt.
Well it IS their Waterloo, after all. A few days ago they were still assured that 2016 was a sure thing for the Democrats, now it is crumbling around them.
So far the only thing you have established is that you claim no one has established anything.
Yep, and all they have left as far as candidates are Biden and Elizabeth Warren.
Dumb and dumber.
She hasn't said she's going to turn over her email collection. She gave the State Department permission to turn over the ones she gave to them. That isn't every email in her collection. Far from it, in fact.
So now Hillary is saying that she wants the State Department to release all her emails. Who amongst us would want their emails released to the public? Everyone has something that they wouldn't want public even if it were to avoid hurting someone's feelings.
This doesn't pass the "normal person" test.
Too bad... she set up the Dark Server... and those emails are our property.
Had she played by the rules it wouldn't be an issue. She didn't, which is consistent with previous Clinton Crime Family behavior, and well... tough darts.
Here I thought that was the whole point? Now it's changed cause she's cooperating?
I'm still a bit murky on which law means what, but if my boss found out I was conducting all his business on a private server his lawyers would be all over me like white on rice. Another way this doesn't pass the "normal person" test.
Now that she got rid of all the damning emails, she's cooperating.
Now that she got rid of all the damning emails, she's cooperating.
Yeah she better cooperate.
Fox News has exclusively obtained an internal 2011 State Department cable that shows Secretary of State Clinton’s office told employees not to use personal email for security reasons, while at the same time, HRC conducted all government business on a private account. Sent to Diplomatic and Consular Staff in June 2011, the unclassified cable, with Clinton’s electronic signature, makes clear to “avoid conducting official Department from your personal e-mail accounts” and employees should not “auto-forward Department email to personal email accounts which is prohibited by Department policy.”
The Cable was addressed to all diplomatic and consular posts with the subject line “Securing Personal E-mail Accounts.” While the cable told employees to secure personal/home email accounts given increased targeting of government employees, it makes clear that these personal accounts should never be used for government business and cites the departure procedures which prohibit the practices. The relevant section is from the Foreign Affairs Manual, 12, subsection 544.3.....snip~
Just got this document from FNC's Catherine Herridge about Secretary Clinton and personal emails | Gretawire
Hillary Clinton is nothing but a crook, but the Left will vote for her no matter what.
Means nothing one way or another in terms of validating the claim that they've been "scrubbed". If you want to claim that they were "scrubbed" like clownboy did, I welcome you to bring forward your evidence. I'm not a fan of useless conjecture.
Hillary Clinton is nothing but a crook, but the Left will vote for her no matter what.
"Hillary Clinton Tweets That She Wants Her Email Released To The Public"
So what is stopping her?
How is that any different from Iran saying that inspectors may have access to nuclear facilities A, B and C and must trust their word that they are the only one's that exist? It has been over two years since the Benghazi "video protest" attacks - why should we trust her (or her staff) to supply the full (unedited) set of her "personal" E-mails? On can zip anything to a back-up device and assert that it is a complete copy of all of their files.