• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton Tweets That She Wants Her Email Released To The Public

catch22 said:
So the only way for Hillary to be trusted is for her to release her emails. But currently she is not trusted enough to release the full content of her emails. So if she releases them now people will say she didn't release all of them but if she doesn't release them then she is considered untrustworthy.

Seems to me like a Catch-22 :)
(I think I joined at just the right time)
Click to expand...

The admission, so far, that a subset was sent has created that situation.
 
Good news indeed. They prove the Email address does exist. But state don't have this one. Hillary's excuses and the naysayers/supporters just can't help her out with this issue now.
yes.gif


Bet she doesn't want people to see those emails now.....huh?
evil6.gif





Hillary Clinton supporters have defended her use of a private email account to conduct official State Department business by arguing that she emailed colleagues at their government addresses, ensuring that a copy of the correspondence would be retained on government servers and available to archivists. As it turns out, some aides to Hillary Clinton also used private email addresses. But even if Team Hillary's initial claim had held together, it wouldn't matter. Public records laws encompass not just correspondence with other government employees but also emails with third parties about government business.

That's why a particular email flagged by J.K. Trotter is important. Back in 2013, a hacker secured access to the private email account of Sidney Blumenthal, a staffer in Bill Clinton's White House. The hacker sent screenshots of his inbox to various news outlets, including Gawker. "According to those screenshots, Blumenthal was regularly sending Clinton what appeared to be freelance intelligence reports—including information and advice about the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya—all of which clearly fell under the rubric of official State Department business," Trotter writes. "At the time, Gawker noted that Clinton’s apparent use of the non-official account likely violated federal regulations governing records retention, and sent inquiries directly to Clinton and to the White House asking if messages to the clintonemail.com address were being retained."

Gawker also "filed a FOIA request with the agency for all correspondence to date between Hillary Clinton and Sidney Blumenthal," Trotter continues, "specifically including any messages to or from the hdr22@clintonemail.com account." We now know that email address did, in fact, belong to former Secretary of State Clinton. Had she been following the rules and forwarding all email about official business to government servers, the State Department would've found the Blumenthal email. They found nothing.....snip~

A Hillary Clinton Email the State Department Couldn't Find
 
zimmer said:
Hillary Clinton is simply not to be trusted or believed. Her history of lies, deceptions and amnesia are too long to trust her.

I suggest Hillary release all her emails from her server to the Benghazi Committee, and to the State Dept. Personal and otherwise. Everything. She skirted the system, she is untrustworthy... as far as I'm concerned that was the default SoS server... and the contents are our property.
Click to expand...

SURE. The ONLY emails she wants released to the public are the ones that have been selected and pasteurized.
 
Middleground said:
Oh yeah? What is she guilty of -- well besides being a Democrat?
Click to expand...
Tons of scandals involving the Clintons personally all the way back to the 90's or earlier. Guilt is a legal term, and I know that little trick. She scandalous and foul mouthed. You shouldn't be supporting her, and you know. No doubt you would vote for her if you could, right?
 
American said:
Tons of scandals involving the Clintons personally all the way back to the 90's or earlier. Guilt is a legal term, and I know that little trick. She scandalous and foul mouthed. You shouldn't be supporting her, and you know.
No doubt you would vote for her if you could, right?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Twice, or more. Not being politically "right" is all that's required. The rest doesn't matter.
 
humbolt said:
Twice, or more. Not being politically "right" is all that's required. The rest doesn't matter.
Click to expand...

According to the Left, Jeb Bush should be President because his name is Bush. The threshold of tolerance of Democrats is much higher, even allowing people to be killed.
 
American said:
According to the Left, Jeb Bush should be President because his name is Bush. The threshold of tolerance of Democrats is much higher, even allowing people to be killed.
Click to expand...

They didn't get rid of Ms Flowers did they? :mrgreen:
 
American said:
Tons of scandals involving the Clintons personally all the way back to the 90's or earlier. Guilt is a legal term, and I know that little trick. She scandalous and foul mouthed. You shouldn't be supporting her, and you know. No doubt you would vote for her if you could, right?
Click to expand...


Oh yeah, Whitewater and all that other jazz. Didn't she and Bill kill somebody?

PS. Ah no, I would not vote for her, at least in the Democratic Primary. But if she wins and goes against Jeb or Christie, I would.
 
Middleground said:
Oh yeah, Whitewater and all that other jazz. Didn't she and Bill kill somebody?

PS. Ah no, I would not vote for her, at least in the Democratic Primary. But if she wins and goes against Jeb or Christie, I would.
Click to expand...

I don't know if they killed anyone, just know about the wheeling and dealing that apparently wasn't ethical.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom