- Joined
- Nov 20, 2013
- Messages
- 65,340
- Reaction score
- 49,380
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Yeah but after Benghazi.....wherein several committees found lacking security and the failure to note clear warning signs.
The issue was suppose to be taken care of.....wasn't it? Meaning there was suppose to be focus on all levels of security, Right?
Good point.
Benghazi was a total cluster(bleep!) on the part of the state department, IMO of course. Did they at least lock the barn door to keep the rest of the horses from getting out? Perhaps not.
Yeah, but on the flip side, is it realistic to put South Korea and Benghazi in the same category of threat risk? I'm thinking not.
But still, it's a good point that State should have reviewed and reenforced their personnel protection plans at all levels in the Benghazi aftermath.