Page 16 of 25 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 242

Thread: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

  1. #151
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    Which pictures? Be specific...
    The one you posted in #47.


  2. #152
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    You still don't have a goddamn clue do you? You're a waste of time. I've said so many freaking times in this thread I was never against an investigation. One is already under way so what's the point? I'm a nobody on a message board yapping about ****. It's not like no one who matters in the situation is going to read little ol' me's posts and say "well SB thinks this or that, so let's listen to her!"
    Then you must be new at communicating because when I stated the exact same thing saying I was in favor of an investigation you stated this to me:

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82
    It's sad you find that something to be proud of....
    What about education? Law & order issues? Rebuilding? Helping vets? Helping with the economy? You'd rather go after Emails?
    Yes I'm proud of going after politicians to find the truth. What you implied however was that you were not. Is English a new language to you?


    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82
    My entire stance has been the exact. ****ing. same. in every damn post to you. You're too blind by **** to read a ****ing **** thing I've said. Go back and read my **** if you really gave a damn. But you don't. You're too interested in calling me a hack on a POLITICAL BOARD ABOUT DEBATING!
    Also a lie - you stated this in this thread about going after Hillary and her emails...

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82
    There's so much work to do in this country and this is what the right wing is going after.
    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82
    I do think it's stupid you're sitting here yapping and yapping and yapping about the same goddamn **** about this when there's already an investigation and Hillary has been cooperative and saying the same **** about it and handing over everything. It's stupid that you're sitting here when you're already ****ing getting what you want! There's so much other **** to do in this country. I'm done with this crap. Oh and I know you'll claim some sort of "victory" over my being done with this ****. So, go ahead if that makes you feel better about your "victory" while there's so much **** to do in this damn country thanks to you people. You can respond if you want but I'm just done with you in general. I can't talk to you at all. You never comprehend **** that I say and just yap about being a hack on a partisan debate board. What a joke. I'm just having to put you on ignore. I don't need blood pressure medicine at 32.

    What's stupid is your yammering posts and incessant lies. You were now proven to NOT be in favor of it all along as your own words state. Tell you what - either get better at lying or start debating. I do however love how emotional you get .... yes "hack" is the word I'd continue to use regarding your posts, possibly with "extreme" added. Please continue to fail.... I'm digging it.
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  3. #153
    Student
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Last Seen
    03-07-15 @ 12:54 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Communist
    Posts
    150

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    Then you must be new at communicating because when I stated the exact same thing saying I was in favor of an investigation you stated this to me:



    Yes I'm proud of going after politicians to find the truth. What you implied however was that you were not. Is English a new language to you?




    Also a lie - you stated this in this thread about going after Hillary and her emails...






    What's stupid is your yammering posts and incessant lies. You were now proven to NOT be in favor of it all along as your own words state. Tell you what - either get better at lying or start debating. I do however love how emotional you get .... yes "hack" is the word I'd continue to use regarding your posts, possibly with "extreme" added. Please continue to fail.... I'm digging it.
    Oh, so youj're going by IMPLICATIONS. Not what someone says. Just going to show that unless the person has the other "c" on their label they can never win with you.

    And you wonder why people get emotional with you? You're frustrating as **** to talk to because you never comprehend a goddamn thing anyone says. I've seen other people get frustrated with you on here and call you out on your **** and then you whine about ****. And the word I'll use for you is pathetic.

    And why would I waste my time with you when you'll just call me a liar at everything I say to you on here? Who wants to talk to someone who doesn't even open their mind to what the other person is saying about even the weather? If I said here where I live it's beautiful and sunny outside in casual chit chat you'd still call me a liar. I'm done with your ****. Have your "victory" because it's pathetic that you can't talk to people at all when people say **** to you. You don't show any "lies" in my post. I damn well said that. This is stupid because YOU'RE ALREADY GETTING WHAT YOU WANT!!!!

    It's already happening. Why the **** does it matter what I do or don't want? It doesn't!
    Last edited by SouthernBelle82; 03-06-15 at 04:45 PM.

  4. #154
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    The one you posted in #47.
    It was widely published in 2010... here's the Seattle Times article on it:
    White House photo sparks protest | The Seattle Times

    You see in the article it states the photos were made public....

    Quote Originally Posted by Seattle Times
    Doug Wilson, head of public affairs at the Pentagon, said the department did not know the White House photographer was present and had no idea a photo of the event was being released until it became public. He said the photographers who routinely travel with the defense secretary and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff were not allowed to go to the event, and no official Pentagon photos were taken or released.
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  5. #155
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    Fail at what? Talking about ****? And what debate? You're not debating anything!
    You've now been caught in a lie - you stated "You still don't have a goddamn clue do you? You're a waste of time. I've said so many freaking times in this thread I was never against an investigation."

    That's a lie as you own words and prior posts state. That's what fails.... I can't debate with someone who seems to routinely forget what they just said minutes before. So which position would you like to take:

    A).
    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82
    There's so much work to do in this country and this is what the right wing is going after.
    or

    B).

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82
    I've said so many freaking times in this thread I was never against an investigation.

    Note that they are not the same thing.
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  6. #156
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    Oh, so youj're going by IMPLICATIONS.
    Why don't you provide the post #'s of all the times you stated you were never against an investigation.


    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    Not what someone says. Just going to show that unless the person has the other "c" on their label they can never win with you.
    It would help if you were more coherent. You seem to be apt to go into fits of emotional rage ...



    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    And why would I waste my time with you when you'll just call me a liar at everything I say to you on here?
    Because I've already caught you in a lie? Because you advocate looking the other way when it's your political party at the end of the investigation? If your views and posts weren't so laughable I'd think this was some sort of POE joke.

    For someone allegedly in the legal profession you sure don't remember what was said, nor structure your views or arguments factually do you?
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  7. #157
    Student
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Last Seen
    03-07-15 @ 12:54 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Communist
    Posts
    150

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    You've now been caught in a lie - you stated "You still don't have a goddamn clue do you? You're a waste of time. I've said so many freaking times in this thread I was never against an investigation."

    That's a lie as you own words and prior posts state. That's what fails.... I can't debate with someone who seems to routinely forget what they just said minutes before. So which position would you like to take:

    A).


    or

    B).




    Note that they are not the same thing.
    You don't get **** that I've said at all during these last half a dozen pages to you.

    1) There's already a ****ing investigation under way before I even joined this forum.

    2) I have no ****ing say over law or legal procedure dealing with the Secretary of State's office. Shocking, I know. These rules have been in existence for a long time.

    3) What I do or don't think about **** has no bearing at all on anything except my measly little vote in elections the rare times I do have a candidate worth my vote.

    4) I'm not against an investigation because one is already happening. Everything is already going to be turned over and Hillary Clinton has already said she will cooperate and agree's with it. This happened BEFORE I joined this forum by the way.

    5) I said it's stupid you right wingers are spending so much goddamn time over this and harping and harping on and on about this and Benghazi when there's SO much work to be done in this country. This is all you people are ever talking about when you're not talking about people's sex lives. That is pathetic.

    Now, I'm done with your insulting ****. If you can't comprehend that too damn bad.

  8. #158
    Student
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Last Seen
    03-07-15 @ 12:54 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Communist
    Posts
    150

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    Why don't you provide the post #'s of all the times you stated you were never against an investigation.


    It would help if you were more coherent. You seem to be apt to go into fits of emotional rage ...



    Because I've already caught you in a lie? Because you advocate looking the other way when it's your political party at the end of the investigation? If your views and posts weren't so laughable I'd think this was some sort of POE joke.

    For someone allegedly in the legal profession you sure don't remember what was said, nor structure your views or arguments factually do you?
    This is a message board. Not a legal document. Don't flatter yourself. You aren't worth that much time and effort. As far as my emotions it's called frustration because you can't comprehend **** unless the other person is a conservative.

  9. #159
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    You don't get **** that I've said at all during these last half a dozen pages to you.
    I'm going to ignore the rest of your emotional incoherent rant and ask again... A or B?

    Pick one because you've already stated both and have lied saying you've been consistent but you obviously haven't. So which one?
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  10. #160
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    This is a message board. Not a legal document. Don't flatter yourself. You aren't worth that much time and effort.
    Ah so facts don't matter to you..... not surprising!
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


Page 16 of 25 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •