Page 15 of 25 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 242

Thread: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

  1. #141
    Student
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Last Seen
    03-07-15 @ 12:54 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Communist
    Posts
    150

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Fabulous View Post
    What ever are you talking about.
    Wasn't it you who made that post? I got an alert for it but couldn't respond so I figure it's an invite only thread type of thing.

  2. #142
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    You don't know what a pacifier is for babies?
    I've never hear it called a "passy".

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    Lol a partisan hack calling someone else a partisan hack on a political message board where you're here to debate...where you put your political affiliation on the side bar for everyone to see if you want... Amusing.
    No a partisan hack for being willing to ignore seeking the truth from power. Surely not a difficult concept for you?

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    Uh we don't know anything yet last time I checked.
    Yes and if you had your way, we'd not be bothered in the present or future.

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    Yet, you go on and on and on about the law and law breaking but you have no respect for people who are involved in law for their job. What? Partisan hack much?
    Funny you think supporting an investigation is now partisan.

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    I'm in the field of a paralegal. So you want to harp on about "omg what about the law breaking!!!!!! Let's have RULE OF LAW!" yet when you are talking about the people who are involved in law and up holding the law well you have no need for those people who do that as a profession and call us liars.
    Your profession is as irrelevant as it was the first time you mentioned it. Still ironic though.
    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    Which do you want? It just shows you're hypocritical and it's pathetic.
    Now it's not only partisan to want a factual investigation it's now according to you pathetic. Project your pathetic much?

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    Except when you want to use us to get Hillary Clinton for law breaking... You just showed yourself that you really don't care about law breaking. I'm glad you finally showed your true colors. Bless your heart.
    Bless your heart, is there anything you wouldn't say or do darlin' to dissuade people from looking into the truth? No... there isn't is there?

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    Ah yes. You want this "truth" yet you don't want to have anything to do with the people who will find the truth and have no respect for them as in the lawyers and IT professionals and paralegals whose job it is to find out that said truth. Why aren't you quite hypocritical?
    The IT professionals you keep claiming are irrelevnat. Being a self ascribed paralegal one would think you'd know that. No no... a DoJ warrant and confiscation of Hillary's email server must occur first.

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    And you missed the point about "education."
    No I ignored it as irrelevant hippy distopia from as it comes from an idelogue.

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    You just showed yourself that you don't care at all what is found in any sort of investigation. You won't believe it because you have this notion that people involved in the legal field are liars.
    I find your posts liar worthy - however I would not given a DoJ warrant and independent investigator.

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    Why should I waste my time talking to you again? You just called me a liar.
    I called your posts disappointing and flaccid. I call your posts idelogically based and moronic. Why you continue to respond you should reflect upon - perhaps while asking yourself why YOU aren't doing more about education and children instead.

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    You're in no position at all about ad hominems. And did I miss something?
    The entire purpose of the investigation is something you missed and continue to miss.
    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    This is a DEBATE BOARD is it not?
    Only you can answer rhetorical questions.
    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    About ideology and politics? Or did I miss something in signing up?
    No you're here to spread progressive hog wash. You're purpose is clear I'm just wondering why you would also advocate ignoring truth and law at the same time. Rabid ideological nonsense much?

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post
    You've been doing attacks on me during this whole **** "conversation." I really don't think you're in any sort of position to be whining about that now.
    I've been pointing out your inability to set aside ideology and support an investigation and apparently have hit upon the crux of it. You're continued defense of ignoring Hillary's potential misdeads and law breaking for the "sake of the children" tactic as I already stated is a puerile as it gets, even on this debate board. I'm hoping the shock of confrontation will somehow get you to the realization that finding the truth is better than guzzling the progressive hack kool-aid and, bless your heart, I'm not holding my breath on that one.

    So still against investigating Hillary and potential wrong doing in favor of going to help save a tree because ... move along there's nothing to see here with Hillary, right?
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  3. #143
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenton View Post
    I like this strategy. Bring up irrelevant years old photos of our last President.

    When do we get to revisit the old manufactured narratives of "Bush lied people died " ?

    Soon I hope.
    Here is the ultimate photo-op:



  4. #144
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    He can't win with you, if he wasn't there, you would criticize him for not showing his respect.
    He could win if he just went and didn't have to use the photo's of dead servicemen for his PR campaign. How many times since this photo was taken did he go to Dover or preside over dead servicemen coming home from foreign lands? Once more... during the run up to the 2012 election when it was politically advantageous for him to do so.

    Let's not forget, after James Foley was beheaded by ISIS, he was out on the golf course 5 minutes later. That doesn't seem to be a very sincere person in my book but perhaps you see him drowning his sorrow in golf.



    A very sorrowful Obama ....
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  5. #145
    Student
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Last Seen
    03-07-15 @ 12:54 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Communist
    Posts
    150

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    I've never hear it called a "passy".

    No a partisan hack for being willing to ignore seeking the truth from power. Surely not a difficult concept for you?
    Oh yes well my area of the south we call them that. Shrug. Sorry for the confusion. It's a lazy way of calling it that heh heh.

    Well, I see you're not above talking about yourself at least.

    Yes and if you had your way, we'd not be bothered in the present or future.
    Oh, so you missed all the times I said in this thread to wait on an investigation that's going on now? Huh. I guess that doesn't count for the present now? Who knew?


    Funny you think supporting an investigation is now partisan. j
    Well, considering how that's been my stance all along I suppose now it is according to you. Only when I say that is it now. But when it's you it's not.

    Your profession is as irrelevant as it was the first time you mentioned it. Still ironic though.
    Now it's not only partisan to want a factual investigation it's now according to you pathetic. Project your pathetic much?
    You're talking about the law? How is my profession irrelevant?

    I can't possibly live up to you in the area of being pathetic.

    Bless your heart, is there anything you wouldn't say or do darlin' to dissuade people from looking into the truth? No... there isn't is there?
    Except, this whole time my stance has been to wait and see? Huh?

    The IT professionals you keep claiming are irrelevnat. Being a self ascribed paralegal one would think you'd know that. No no... a DoJ warrant and confiscation of Hillary's email server must occur first.
    How is it irrelevant? The IT professionals are the ones who are going to go through and find the Emails etc? What? Yes, sweetie. I'm glad you understand the concept of a warrant. And after that comes the IT professionals who will go through the computer. So, it's irrelevant how? This is my field. I do this ****. Do you actually know what a paralegal is? I'm asking sincerely because I have run across people who don't know.

    No I ignored it as irrelevant hippy distopia from as it comes from an idelogue.

    I find your posts liar worthy - however I would not given a DoJ warrant and independent investigator.
    But again, isn't the point of this forum to be biased and debate **** based on your ideology? So, what? This is a message board. This isn't an investigation. You're here to yap about ****.

    And I find your post hilariously amusing. So, your point being?

    I called your posts disappointing and flaccid. I call your posts idelogically based and moronic. Why you continue to respond you should reflect upon - perhaps while asking yourself why YOU aren't doing more about education and children instead.
    Thus you're calling ME that. I do write the posts from my thoughts. They don't magically appear. I'm not the one who should be reflecting here. How do you know I'm not doing more in education and children? I haven't even been here a week yet. And you're already making assumptions about me. Tsk, tsk.

    The entire purpose of the investigation is something you missed and continue to miss.
    Only you can answer rhetorical questions.
    No you're here to spread progressive hog wash. You're purpose is clear I'm just wondering why you would also advocate ignoring truth and law at the same time. Rabid ideological nonsense much?
    And you're here to spread conservative hog wash. Your point? What truth? Nothing has been done yet!

    I've been pointing out your inability to set aside ideology and support an investigation and apparently have hit upon the crux of it. You're continued defense of ignoring Hillary's potential misdeads and law breaking for the "sake of the children" tactic as I already stated is a puerile as it gets, even on this debate board. I'm hoping the shock of confrontation will somehow get you to the realization that finding the truth is better than guzzling the progressive hack kool-aid and, bless your heart, I'm not holding my breath on that one.

    So still against investigating Hillary and potential wrong doing in favor of going to help save a tree because ... move along there's nothing to see here with Hillary, right?
    Ah now you said the magic word. POTENTIAL. Hence the whole thing of wait and see. But you don't even have the decency to do that. Spreading hog wash in deed.

  6. #146
    Left the building
    Fearandloathing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada Dual citizen
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    18,403

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    He could win if he just went and didn't have to use the photo's of dead servicemen for his PR campaign. How many times since this photo was taken did he go to Dover or preside over dead servicemen coming home from foreign lands? Once more... during the run up to the 2012 election when it was politically advantageous for him to do so.

    Let's not forget, after James Foley was beheaded by ISIS, he was out on the golf course 5 minutes later. That doesn't seem to be a very sincere person in my book but perhaps you see him drowning his sorrow in golf.



    A very sorrowful Obama ....
    Oh he's hurting....

    See the anguish in his eyes........with a microscope maybe
    ""You know, when we sell to other countries, even if they're allies -- you never know about an ally. An ally can turn."
    Donald Trump, 11/23/17

  7. #147
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    w
    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    He could win if he just went and didn't have to use the photo's of dead servicemen for his PR campaign. How many times since this photo was taken did he go to Dover or preside over dead servicemen coming home from foreign lands? Once more... during the run up to the 2012 election when it was politically advantageous for him to do so.

    Let's not forget, after James Foley was beheaded by ISIS, he was out on the golf course 5 minutes later. That doesn't seem to be a very sincere person in my book but perhaps you see him drowning his sorrow in golf.



    A very sorrowful Obama ....

    When did he use those pictures for a PR campaign?


  8. #148
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    w


    When did he use those pictures for a PR campaign?
    Which pictures? Be specific...
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  9. #149
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBelle82 View Post

    Ah now you said the magic word. POTENTIAL. Hence the whole thing of wait and see. But you don't even have the decency to do that. Spreading hog wash in deed.

    Let's just cut to the chance shall we? What and why are you against an investigation of Hillary, who while she was Sec. of State, did not follow the law as well as regulations of the office for communications in email? Why should I be more worried about education than the potential next President ignoring the law and or ignoring national security.... And by the way, I never claimed it was anything OTHER than potential.
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  10. #150
    Student
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Last Seen
    03-07-15 @ 12:54 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Communist
    Posts
    150

    Re: House Committee Subpoenas Clinton Emails in Benghazi Probe

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    Let's just cut to the chance shall we? What and why are you against an investigation of Hillary, who while she was Sec. of State, did not follow the law as well as regulations of the office for communications in email? Why should I be more worried about education than the potential next President ignoring the law and or ignoring national security.... And by the way, I never claimed it was anything OTHER than potential.
    You still don't have a goddamn clue do you? You're a waste of time. I've said so many freaking times in this thread I was never against an investigation. One is already under way so what's the point? I'm a nobody on a message board yapping about ****. It's not like no one who matters in the situation is going to read little ol' me's posts and say "well SB thinks this or that, so let's listen to her!"

    My entire stance has been the exact. ****ing. same. in every damn post to you. You're too blind by **** to read a ****ing **** thing I've said. Go back and read my **** if you really gave a damn. But you don't. You're too interested in calling me a hack on a POLITICAL BOARD ABOUT DEBATING!

    I do think it's stupid you're sitting here yapping and yapping and yapping about the same goddamn **** about this when there's already an investigation and Hillary has been cooperative and saying the same **** about it and handing over everything. It's stupid that you're sitting here when you're already ****ing getting what you want! There's so much other **** to do in this country. I'm done with this crap. Oh and I know you'll claim some sort of "victory" over my being done with this ****. So, go ahead if that makes you feel better about your "victory" while there's so much **** to do in this damn country thanks to you people. You can respond if you want but I'm just done with you in general. I can't talk to you at all. You never comprehend **** that I say and just yap about being a hack on a partisan debate board. What a joke. I'm just having to put you on ignore. I don't need blood pressure medicine at 32.
    Last edited by SouthernBelle82; 03-06-15 at 04:21 PM.

Page 15 of 25 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •