• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218, 239]

Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

The Republican Party is so short on talent that they can only draw their presidents from one family!

That is an amusing taunt considering that you on the left seem so dead set on coronating Hillary Clinton.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

I predicted that Obama would beat Romney.

Who's living in the White House right now and who's playing with his car elevator? :roll:

Just for the record: Scott Walker will not be moving into the White House in 2017.

Sorry sport. We are not impressed with your predictions. You had at least a 50-50 chance of getting it right. I'm betting that you predicted Gore wouldf win in 2000 and Kerry would win in 2004.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

What a gross display of fellatio these Republicans gave Bibi. All just to suck up to AIPAC for some $'s. Bibi... another right wing tool preaching lie-based fear to hang on to power. Disgusting. If you guys want him to be your leader sooooo badly... move there.
 
Last edited:
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

What a gross display of fellatio these Republicans gave Bibi. All just to suck up to AIPAC for some $'s. Bibi... another right wing tool preaching lie-based fear to hang on to power. Disgusting. If you guys want him to be your leader sooooo badly... move there.

It's the left wingers who are getting all hot,bothered, and partisan over the Bibi speech. We do not see it as a partisan political speech. We just recognize that Bibi is right in regards to Iran and the utter stupidity of the deal that the Obama and Kerry are pushing. If it goes through, you can expect a nuclear arms race in the middle east within 10 years.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

Are you ashamed that Obama is so intensely determined to help Iran with its nuclear program? Nah, I'm sure you're not.
______________


Resisting Netanyahu’s obsession with starting WW 3 is hardly “helping Iran with its nuclear program” especially with draconian sanctions already in place.

Are you that eager to see thousands of American G.I.s & millions of innocent, Regional citizens die in a cataclysmic confrontation for your TV viewing entertainment?



Name one specific way in which Obama is aiding Iran develop a nuclear weapon.



"One of the most horrible features of war is that all the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are NOT fighting."
George Orwell, 1938
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

What a gross display of fellatio these Republicans gave Bibi. All just to suck up to AIPAC for some $'s. Bibi... another right wing tool preaching lie-based fear to hang on to power. Disgusting. If you guys want him to be your leader sooooo badly... move there.

I think the hoopla surrounding the Netanyahu visit was distinctly exaggerated. AIPAC and the Boehner ilk realize the visit was ill-advised and there was much criticism in the media along with a number of Congress people deliberately avoiding the speech. Their hyped up excitement for Netanyahu was done to try and overshadow this embarrassing and tactless move by both John Boehner and the scheming unscrupulous Bibi Netanyahu.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

The Tea Party is the group most irreconcilably opposed to President Obama because he is different; hence, they never miss an opportunity to use vindictive spite against this current US president.

Please tell us what the Tea Party is all about, since you pretend to know so much. From what you have written, you don't have a clue.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

______________


Resisting Netanyahu’s obsession with starting WW 3 is hardly “helping Iran with its nuclear program” especially with draconian sanctions already in place.

Are you that eager to see thousands of American G.I.s & millions of innocent, Regional citizens die in a cataclysmic confrontation for your TV viewing entertainment?



Name one specific way in which Obama is aiding Iran develop a nuclear weapon.



"One of the most horrible features of war is that all the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are NOT fighting."
George Orwell, 1938

If the sanctions were working, Obama wouldn't have to negotiate-not that that has worked either-Iran has rejected the negotiations.

Its time to take out Irans nuke program. The chump in chief may not, but others will.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

It's the left wingers who are getting all hot,bothered, and partisan over the Bibi speech. We do not see it as a partisan political speech. We just recognize that Bibi is right in regards to Iran and the utter stupidity of the deal that the Obama and Kerry are pushing. If it goes through, you can expect a nuclear arms race in the middle east within 10 years.

I tell you, it was great seeing Bibi up there, speaking like a strong, decisive leader. Something that has been sorely lacking in Washington for the last several years.

Then, Obama, with his petty, childish little response, just making himself look even more inept. Oh, wait until you see what my deal with Iran will do! What a total jerk. Obama was pissed because Netanyahu, without even trying, just exposed Obama as an inferior president that just gets pushed around by our enemies. He doesn't have the balls to handle the office he's in.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

I tell you, it was great seeing Bibi up there, speaking like a strong, decisive leader. Something that has been sorely lacking in Washington for the last several years.

Then, Obama, with his petty, childish little response, just making himself look even more inept. Oh, wait until you see what my deal with Iran will do! What a total jerk. Obama was pissed because Netanyahu, without even trying, just exposed Obama as an inferior president that just gets pushed around by our enemies. He doesn't have the balls to handle the office he's in.
He read the transcript!!!LOL!
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

I tell you, it was great seeing Bibi up there, speaking like a strong, decisive leader. Something that has been sorely lacking in Washington for the last several years.

Then, Obama, with his petty, childish little response, just making himself look even more inept. Oh, wait until you see what my deal with Iran will do! What a total jerk. Obama was pissed because Netanyahu, without even trying, just exposed Obama as an inferior president that just gets pushed around by our enemies. He doesn't have the balls to handle the office he's in.

Obama's problem is that he is such a narcissist that he does not think rank and file Americans are smart enough to work out that the deal Kerry is offering Iran amounts to little more the Obama telling the Iranians: Yes...you can have nukes...you just have to wait until eight years after I leave office to let the world know you have them."
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

It's the left wingers who are getting all hot,bothered, and partisan over the Bibi speech. We do not see it as a partisan political speech. We just recognize that Bibi is right in regards to Iran and the utter stupidity of the deal that the Obama and Kerry are pushing. If it goes through, you can expect a nuclear arms race in the middle east within 10 years.

Moar lie based fear from the right. Why would there be an arms race if there is a deal struck where they don't make nuclear arms. You are making no sense whatsoever. Just like Bibi.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

I think the hoopla surrounding the Netanyahu visit was distinctly exaggerated. AIPAC and the Boehner ilk realize the visit was ill-advised and there was much criticism in the media along with a number of Congress people deliberately avoiding the speech. Their hyped up excitement for Netanyahu was done to try and overshadow this embarrassing and tactless move by both John Boehner and the scheming unscrupulous Bibi Netanyahu.

Exactly. It was done for three things.

1) Bibi did it to make it a campaign ad for his election
2) Boehner did it for the repubs to suck up for AIPAC money
3) Repubs did it to rally their base by being disrespectful to the president... their favorite past time these days.

I recall back during Bush's rush to war in Iraq that saying anything that disagreed with that view you were an unpatriotic treasonist. I could just imagine the Dems inviting the French prime minister back then to speak in front of congress without approaching Bush about it first... the outrage would've been deafening. As all republican outrage seems to always be.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

Exactly. It was done for three things.

1) Bibi did it to make it a campaign ad for his election
2) Boehner did it for the repubs to suck up for AIPAC money
3) Repubs did it to rally their base by being disrespectful to the president... their favorite past time these days.

I recall back during Bush's rush to war in Iraq that saying anything that disagreed with that view you were an unpatriotic treasonist. I could just imagine the Dems inviting the French prime minister back then to speak in front of congress without approaching Bush about it first... the outrage would've been deafening. As all republican outrage seems to always be.
Have you been called an unpatriotic treasonist very often? I've never heard the term before.

And with all this going on your concern is 'disrespect' for Barrack Obama, the guy you believed when he said, "If you like your plan you can keep your plan"? This is a devotion seldom seen in politics anymore and would be admirable if it didn't suggest some serious side issues.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

He read the transcript!!!LOL!

What a baby. Of course he watched it. He said he just skimmed through it or something, then goes into detail of what he thought about it. Huh? He just takes us all, especially his backers, for idiots. After all, that's how he got elected.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

Moar lie based fear from the right. Why would there be an arms race if there is a deal struck where they don't make nuclear arms. You are making no sense whatsoever. Just like Bibi.

Get off your partisan high horse and pay attention to what the Obama admin is proposing. It amounts to little more then a ten year freeze in uranium enrichment with what's left of the sanctions gradually disappearing by the end of that ten years. At best it's a ten year delay on Iran getting nukes, with no incentive for Iran to halt their quest for nukes afterward. And that's only if Iran does not cheat on the agreement. We know how that worked out with North Korea. The whole Bibi speech is nothing but a "Bibi dissed Obama" thang to you, huh? If Iran gets nukes, there will be a nuclear arms race in the middle east....and all you are worried about is whether Obama is politically damaged politically in his last two years in office?
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

Get off your partisan high horse and pay attention to what the Obama admin is proposing. It amounts to little more then a ten year freeze in uranium enrichment with what's left of the sanctions gradually disappearing by the end of that ten years. At best it's a ten year delay on Iran getting nukes, with no incentive for Iran to halt their quest for nukes afterward. And that's only if Iran does not cheat on the agreement. We know how that worked out with North Korea. The whole Bibi speech is nothing but a "Bibi dissed Obama" thang to you, huh? If Iran gets nukes, there will be a nuclear arms race in the middle east....and all you are worried about is whether Obama is politically damaged politically in his last two years in office?

The thing that annoys me the most about the Right is that there is never original or independent thought taking place. It is most apparent when talking points are repeated which have blatant or obvious flaws.
The problem with this talking point is the same as the problem with most Right Wing talking points. It does a great job of creating drama and casting doubt, but it offers no feasible or workable solution.

Suppose your redundant talking point is correct for a moment. OK... now what? What is your Israeli heroe's alternative plan? Does John Boehner have an alternative plan? Do John Boehner's cooperate masters have a plan?
The only alternative plan that has been presented by the Right was presented by McCain over 7 years ago. "Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran."

If Bibi had the balls to discuss the alternative possible plans, lets evaluate what they might be.

If we withdraw from the current path towards negotiation, we will lose the Russians and Chinese for sanctions. It is a miracle that we have not lost Russia already due to the tensions over Ukraine.
Sanctions have also never worked on Iran.
These 2 facts combined make continued sanctions become completely worthless and unproductive.
Furthermore, the Iranians are insulted by the sanctions and are even less likely to cooperate.

There are 2 remaining options. Targeted attacks or a full out mass invasion.

Targeted attacks have been downplayed as a viable option by all the experts for years. This is why Bush did not do it. They are not expected to work and would cause Iran to triple it's efforts and at the same time justify it's reason for wanting nuclear weapons.
In addition to it not working in the long term, Iran has a sophisticated air defense and air force and the bombs needed must be dropped from aircraft, not merely guided missiles. Therefore, even for a small strike, we would have to first dominate Iran's air defense. That in itself could be a 30 to 60 day war.

The only thing left is a full out mass invasion to have boots on the ground controlling the actual nuclear sites.
We would win this war without a doubt. The cost would be great. We'd lose over 20,000 troops. We'd lose some ships and many aircraft.
Iran would devastate the oil fields in Saudi Arabia and cripple the oil shipping ability for the entire Middle East.
Iran would attack Israel and the entire Middle East would erupt in total chaos.

None of that even matters though, because the American people are not about to sign off on a full Invasion of Iran.
Just not gonna happen.

And if it is simply not gonna happen regardless of who is running the Country... this means what?

It means that all of this crap is political theater and that you had better hope that our President gets the best deal that he possibly can... because that is all we got.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

The thing that annoys me the most about the Right is that there is never original or independent thought taking place. It is most apparent when talking points are repeated which have blatant or obvious flaws.
The problem with this talking point is the same as the problem with most Right Wing talking points. It does a great job of creating drama and casting doubt, but it offers no feasible or workable solution.


Big big yawn.

Suppose your redundant talking point is correct for a moment. OK... now what? What is your Israeli heroe's alternative plan? Does John Boehner have an alternative plan? Do John Boehner's cooperate masters have a plan?
The only alternative plan that has been presented by the Right was presented by McCain over 7 years ago. "Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran."

Bigger yawn.



If Bibi had the balls to discuss the alternative possible plans, lets evaluate what they might be.

It's Obama that does not have the balls. You know it and I know it.

If we withdraw from the current path towards negotiation, we will lose the Russians and Chinese for sanctions. It is a miracle that we have not lost Russia already due to the tensions over Ukraine.
Sanctions have also never worked on Iran.
These 2 facts combined make continued sanctions become completely worthless and unproductive.
Furthermore, the Iranians are insulted by the sanctions and are even less likely to cooperate.

There were sanctions in place that was slowly bankrupting Iran.....which is why they are negotiating to begin with. Many of those sanctions were suspended for the sake of the negotiations. Bad move.



There are 2 remaining options. Targeted attacks or a full out mass invasion.

Targeted attacks have been downplayed as a viable option by all the experts for years. This is why Bush did not do it. They are not expected to work and would cause Iran to triple it's efforts and at the same time justify it's reason for wanting nuclear weapons.
In addition to it not working in the long term, Iran has a sophisticated air defense and air force and the bombs needed must be dropped from aircraft, not merely guided missiles. Therefore, even for a small strike, we would have to first dominate Iran's air defense. That in itself could be a 30 to 60 day war.

The only thing left is a full out mass invasion to have boots on the ground controlling the actual nuclear sites.
We would win this war without a doubt. The cost would be great. We'd lose over 20,000 troops. We'd lose some ships and many aircraft.
Iran would devastate the oil fields in Saudi Arabia and cripple the oil shipping ability for the entire Middle East.
Iran would attack Israel and the entire Middle East would erupt in total chaos.

None of that even matters though, because the American people are not about to sign off on a full Invasion of Iran.
Just not gonna happen.

If we do not stop Iran from getting nukes "NOW", A ground invasion will come later, whether we like it or not. As for what we could do now......tightening the noose on sanctions can't hurt. If it comes to military options....I don't agree that it can only be done with a full onslaught ground invasion. Bunker buster bombs can take out the nuke sites if properly targeted and taking out their oil fields would cut off their means to continue down the nuke road. They would eventually get the point. I hope sanctions can work...however the alternative is: "Whatever it takes!" Otherwise 50 to 100 years into the future, the adults will be asking:"Why didn't they stop the Iranians from getting nukes when they could have?!

And if it is simply not gonna happen regardless of who is running the Country... this means what? It means that all of this crap is political theater and that you had better hope that our President gets the best deal that he possibly can... because that is all we got.

The real political theater is Obama sending Kerry over to negotiate with Iran for the sake a a deal....any deal on paper that he can point to in his so-called legacy claiming that he dealt with Iran's nuke program. Carter did the same in regards to North Korea. They were cheating on the deal before the ink on the signed agreement was dry....and they now have nukes. You don't think Iran will do the same? Obama is doing the political theater. Bibi is acting for the sake of Israel's survival. If Kerry gets a deal with Iran.....it could happen any day, weeks, or months. Bibi should not be expected to wait out the elections before acting.
 
Last edited:
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

The thing that annoys me the most about the Right is that there is never original or independent thought taking place. It is most apparent when talking points are repeated which have blatant or obvious flaws.
The problem with this talking point is the same as the problem with most Right Wing talking points. It does a great job of creating drama and casting doubt, but it offers no feasible or workable solution.

Suppose your redundant talking point is correct for a moment. OK... now what? What is your Israeli heroe's alternative plan? Does John Boehner have an alternative plan? Do John Boehner's cooperate masters have a plan?
The only alternative plan that has been presented by the Right was presented by McCain over 7 years ago. "Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran."

If Bibi had the balls to discuss the alternative possible plans, lets evaluate what they might be.

If we withdraw from the current path towards negotiation,
we will lose the Russians and Chinese for sanctions. It is a miracle that we have not lost Russia already due to the tensions over Ukraine.
Sanctions have also never worked on Iran.
These 2 facts combined make continued sanctions become completely worthless and unproductive.
Furthermore, the Iranians are insulted by the sanctions and are even less likely to cooperate.

There are 2 remaining options. Targeted attacks or a full out mass invasion.

Targeted attacks have been downplayed as a viable option by all the experts for years. This is why Bush did not do it. They are not expected to work and would cause Iran to triple it's efforts and at the same time justify it's reason for wanting nuclear weapons.
In addition to it not working in the long term, Iran has a sophisticated air defense and air force and the bombs needed must be dropped from aircraft, not merely guided missiles. Therefore, even for a small strike, we would have to first dominate Iran's air defense. That in itself could be a 30 to 60 day war.

The only thing left is a full out mass invasion to have boots on the ground controlling the actual nuclear sites.
We would win this war without a doubt. The cost would be great. We'd lose over 20,000 troops. We'd lose some ships and many aircraft.
Iran would devastate the oil fields in Saudi Arabia and cripple the oil shipping ability for the entire Middle East.
Iran would attack Israel and the entire Middle East would erupt in total chaos.

None of that even matters though, because the American people are not about to sign off on a full Invasion of Iran.
Just not gonna happen.

And if it is simply not gonna happen regardless of who is running the Country... this means what?

It means that all of this crap is political theater and that you had better hope that our President gets the best deal that he possibly can... because that is all we got.

Russia and China are not participating in sanctions against Iran.
Sanctions brought Iran to the talks and then the sanctions were backed off and deadlines were moved.
Was the rest of your post similarly skewed?
Might explain what appears to be your overall POV.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

You've made your loyalty very clear.

Why, then, do you try to deceive readers into thinking that you care about the U.S. posting an American flag?




America's interests are not Israel's interests just as Israel has attacked US installations & killed Americans to drag the US into fighting Israel's wars beginning with the Lavon Affaire & including subsequent attacks:

“U.S.S. COLE ATTACKED BY ISRAEL”
http://perieci.meneyung.com/.cache/uss-cole-i...



“Beirut Marine bombing was Mossad False Flag*Operation”
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/09/15/beirut-marine-bombing-was-mossad-false-flag-operation/



“CSI Forensics Proves Who Killed US Marines”*
CSI Forensics Proves Who Killed US Marines » David Icke...


"Israel Charged with Systematic Harassment of U.S. Marines"
Israel Charged with Systematic Harassment of U.S. Marines

etc, etc

I can easily cite other attacks & additional sources since you'll try to avoid an honest rebuttal by attacking the sources I cited as not having C.A.M.E.R.A.'S imprimatur



Maybe it's time to post a flag more in keeping with your loyalties
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

Obama's problem is that he is such a narcissist that he does not think rank and file Americans are smart enough to work out that the deal Kerry is offering Iran amounts to little more the Obama telling the Iranians: Yes...you can have nukes...you just have to wait until eight years after I leave office to let the world know you have them."
Obama has already expressed his contempt for his supporters and yet they re-elected him. Of course, like Gruber, he understands he will always get their support because they are so desperate to believe.

He and his inner circle understand that you really can fool some of the people all of the time.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

ISRAELI EX MOSSAD CHIEF VS NETANYAHU


Netanyahu's Circus seemed to backfire in spite of his trotting out Eli Weasel instead of his dog eared "Acme Bomb" Cartoon.
Nancy Pelosi cited Netanyahu as "Insulting" Americans as he offered no alternatives to negotiations except bombing.

The only tangible result was more American opposition to Netanyahu & a 5% jump in the polls for Obama at this point.



“Americans Rally Around The President As Obama Approval Jumps 5 Points Thanks To Netanyahu”
Americans Rally Around The President As Obama Approval Jumps 5 Points Thanks To Netanyahu
EXCERPT “Since Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu arrived in the U.S., President Obama’s approval rating has increased by 5 points in the Gallup poll.”CONTINUED

Nancy Pelosi is a geriatric bimbo. And only wishful thinking liberals take a gallup poll seriously barely past a day after Bibi's speech to congress.

___________________

Slander & negative generalizations about "Liberals" seem to be the only messages you have to convey.

Both are signs of desperation from simply being mistaken.

I humbly submit that Israel's Mossad ex-Chief is far more knowledgable and honest about Iran's nuclear capability than you, Netanyahu and War Mongering Ziono-Cons

For Example:


“Anti-Netanyahu Protest Fills Streets Of Tel Aviv As Ex-Mossad Chief Calls His Congress Speech "Bull****"
Anti-Netanyahu Protest Fills Streets Of Tel Aviv As Ex-Mossad Chief Calls His Congress Speech Bullshit - One News Page

EXCERPT “Meir Dagan, a former Mossad director, strongly disagreed with many of Netanyahu’s assertions, stating that "Iranian missiles will never be able to hit the United States," and that comments that Iran could producer nuclear weapons within a year were "bull****."
.....it's not just just Dagan that is disappointed, a large protest against him erupted in the nation’s section largest city, Tel Aviv.

It appears “Bibi” is far more popular with crazy American neocons than he is with his own fellow citizens.” CONTINUED




What do you propose as a sane solution other than negotiations with Iran?
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

Slander & negative generalizations about "Liberals" seem to be the only messages you have to convey.
And usually for good reason. For example, you are quoting the EX-Chief of Mossad who has been out of office for four years, not the current Mossad Chief who certainly knows more than his predecessor and you.

Now you might see why liberals don't garner much respect in the real world, with Obama being a good example of that.
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

______________


Resisting Netanyahu’s obsession with starting WW 3 is hardly “helping Iran with its nuclear program” especially with draconian sanctions already in place.

Are you that eager to see thousands of American G.I.s & millions of innocent, Regional citizens die in a cataclysmic confrontation for your TV viewing entertainment?

Name one specific way in which Obama is aiding Iran develop a nuclear weapon.

"One of the most horrible features of war is that all the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are NOT fighting."
George Orwell, 1938

We are paying them billions of dollars just to talk to us.

The Iran deal makes clear it pays to enrich - The Washington Post
 
Re: CNN/ORC poll: Majority of Americans oppose Netanyahu invite [W:218]

REAL COST OF AID TO ISRAEL

We are paying them billions of dollars just to talk to us.

The Iran deal makes clear it pays to enrich - The Washington Post
________________

The WP Blog you cited contradicts the $Billions that draconian US sanctions have cost Iran


We've given Israel $Trillions to attack us, spy on us, sell our secrets to the highest bidder & snub our requests Re: Illegal Settlements



“The Real Cost Of US Support For Israel – $3*Trillion”
https://nwoobserver.wordpress.com/2011/02/21/the-real-cost-of-us-support-for-israel-3-trillion/
EXCERPT “ While it is commonly reported that Israel officially receives some $3 billion every year in the form of economic aid from the U.S. government, this figure is just the tip of the iceberg.

There are many billions of dollars more in hidden costs and economic losses lurking beneath the surface. A recently published economic analysis has concluded that U.S. support for the state of Israel has cost American taxpayers nearly $3 trillion ($3 million millions) in 2002 dollars.

“The Costs to American Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: $3 Trillion” is a summary of economic research done by Thomas R. Stauffer.

Stauffer is a Washington, D.C.-based engineer and economist who writes and teaches about the economics of energy and the Middle East.

Stauffer has taught at Harvard University and Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service.
” CONTINUED




HOWEVER:

The Topic here has to do with opposition to Netanyahu's blatant falsehoods to provoke another War for Israel's Right Wing extremists.

Both American & Israeli Military & Intelligence Experts have exposed Netanyahu's assertions as deceptive falsehoods while loyal Americans oppose the undeniable disaster Netanyahu's War Mongering will cause for all in the region (incl. U.S. Troops)


Iran has Worldwide support against the egregious nuclear double standard exemplified by US - Israeli Nuclear policy.


What do you propose as an alternative to an even handed Policy reached by negotiations?
 
Back
Top Bottom