- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 88,672
- Reaction score
- 39,664
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
"Hans Blix said in late January 2003 that Iraq had "not genuinely accepted UN resolutions demanding that it disarm."[64] He claimed there were some materials which had not been accounted for. Since sites had been found which evidenced the destruction of chemical weaponry, UNSCOM was actively working with Iraq on methods to ascertain for certain whether the amounts destroyed matched up with the amounts that Iraq had produced.[65][66] In the next quarterly report, after the war, the total amount of proscribed items destroyed by UNMOVIC in Iraq can be gathered.[67] Those include:I just proved to you that Hans Blix, who led that team, says there was nothing, nada, zilch, zip. He went home and wrote a scathing letter about the liars. And has subsequently given a bunch of speeches about this. Hans Blix was there, you were not, so I'll go with his report.
50 deployed Al-Samoud 2 missiles
Various equipment, including vehicles, engines and warheads, related to the AS2 missiles
2 large propellant casting chambers
14 155 mm shells filled with mustard gas, the mustard gas totaling approximately 49 litres and still at high purity
Approximately 500 ml of thiodiglycol
Some 122 mm chemical warheads
Some chemical equipment
224.6 kg of expired growth media
Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You 'proved' precisely dick. Blix, Ritter...they all confirmed the same thing. They could not account for or find what they knew previously Saddam had.