• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

Yup. That's why I keep pointing out that the people who are "hijacking" religion are the people who DON'T do what their supposed holy books say.

An interesting take, basically calling the vast majority of humanity apostates, but OK.
 
An interesting take, basically calling the vast majority of humanity apostates, but OK.

Religious people are idiots no matter how you spin it. I'm just pointing out the absurdity of Obama's position, and yours.
 
Religious people are idiots no matter how you spin it. I'm just pointing out the absurdity of Obama's position, and yours.

What is my position, and what's so absurd about it?
 
What is my position, and what's so absurd about it?

Apparently, since you keep defending Obama, your position is similar.
 
Please. It's not a "victim" thing at all. What else would YOU call someone who does nothing but baselessly smear "the left" 24-7? I thought conservatives actually fought for conservative principles, rather than sitting around whining about liberals.

Its more like liberals whining about conservatives.
 
Apparently, since you keep defending Obama, your position is similar.

You didn't answer either of my questions.

Obama's position regarding the association of radicals to mainstream Islam dates back to the Bush administration. It's called managing the messaging.
 
You didn't answer either of my questions.

Obama's position regarding the association of radicals to mainstream Islam dates back to the Bush administration. It's called managing the messaging.

It's called continuing an idiotic position with another idiotic position.
 
That's because they are not Muslims, they are barbarians.


You and the Obama administration know those people better than they know themselves. They're not Muslim? They aren't terrorizing and murdering innocent people because they are infidels. They aren't fighting for their religion to take over the world. Their actions have nothing to do with their religious beliefs?

What PC insight.

I will give Obama one thing, he's smarter than his ardent followers. He got you guys to believe it.
 
First the 'problem' isn't a religion but a few terrorists who pervert a religion in an attempt to gain cover for their incredible vicious power grab.

They are following the Qur'an and implementing Sharia Law, which comes from Islam. That makes them Muslim. Deal with it.

Second, that a few CONs are hellbent on calling these terrorists Muslim doesn't change the equation.

They are Muslims. They are also terrorists. Deal with it.

Third, calling the Japanese slurs during WWII didn't 'help' in the final victory... amazing science did...

Pretending that the Japanese were not responsible would have been just as idiotic as pretending that Muslims are not responsible. Not all, no one has ever claimed that, but certainly some.

Fourth, the President did 'dare utter the problem'- that he didn't phrase it the way a few way out CONs wished is on you.... :peace

He refuses to acknowledge that Islam, at least extremist Islam, is a problem. You just can't spin this any other way. The reason these people are acting the way they are acting is because of their religious beliefs and for NO OTHER REASON! Get it through your head.
 
That's not what Obama is trying to say. From what I'm understanding, Obama is saying ISIS does not represent Islam because they're not actually following the teaching of that faith. They are twisting it to empower themselves, much like the KKK did in America.
But they are following the Koran and the teachings of Mohammed. That's the point. Whether you and Obama agree with them or not, or their interpretations, is beside the point.
 
Did anyone not know who he was referring to, for the most part.
I say most part as presently terror is present in India, Myanmar where Buddhists are killing Muslims.
Or did it not fit a particular agenda.

Myanmar Buddhists Threaten to Kill Muslims

Hindu-Muslim Clashes In Muzaffarpur District In India's Bihar State Kill 3, Police Arrest 14 People

Muslims burned to death in India attack - Al Jazeera English

Hindus attack Muslims in India, 15 killed | Asia-Pasific | Worldbulletin News

Nah, most of these people consider international news propaganda. FOX is real news.
 
Did anyone not know who he was referring to, for the most part.
I say most part as presently terror is present in India, Myanmar where Buddhists are killing Muslims.
Or did it not fit a particular agenda.

Myanmar Buddhists Threaten to Kill Muslims

Hindu-Muslim Clashes In Muzaffarpur District In India's Bihar State Kill 3, Police Arrest 14 People

Muslims burned to death in India attack - Al Jazeera English

Hindus attack Muslims in India, 15 killed | Asia-Pasific | Worldbulletin News

And in India, Hindus are killing Buddhists. Same s**t, different religion.
 
Nah, most of these people consider international news propaganda. FOX is real news.

Were the IRA classed as Roman Catholic terrorists?
 
And in India, Hindus are killing Buddhists. Same s**t, different religion.

And did people not understand who Obama was referring to?
It is all over the news.
Except for the Buddhists and Hindus that is.
 
Not sure why my post prompted that question.

The post did not - the OP did- Obama not using the term Muslim.
No offence was intended.
 
The post did not - the OP did- Obama not using the term Muslim.
No offence was intended.

It's all good, I wasn't offended, just didn't understand it. You posted several good links from international news agencies on Muslims being oppressed, and I was just pointing out that many here won't accept a news story from non American news media.
 
It's all good, I wasn't offended, just didn't understand it. You posted several good links from international news agencies on Muslims being oppressed, and I was just pointing out that many here won't accept a news story from non American news media.

Only using certain news sources can lead to the wrong conclusion.
 
Im saying we have a leader who wont dare utter the problem. His PC spin prevents this.

President Lincoln didn't recognize the Southern rebel uprising as a "war" either. If he had it would have legitimized the Southern seccession. It's the same with Obama refusing to give the jihadists any recognition for their uprising as well. In fact, we shouldn't even be calling them a state.
 
President Lincoln didn't recognize the Southern rebel uprising as a "war" either. If he had it would have legitimized the Southern seccession. It's the same with Obama refusing to give the jihadists any recognition for their uprising as well. In fact, we shouldn't even be calling them a state.

To the bolded. In fact he said that as well in his speech yesterday.
 
First the 'problem' isn't a religion but a few terrorists who pervert a religion in an attempt to gain cover for their incredible vicious power grab.

Second, that a few CONs are hellbent on calling these terrorists Muslim doesn't change the equation.

Third, calling the Japanese slurs during WWII didn't 'help' in the final victory... amazing science did...

Fourth, the President did 'dare utter the problem'- that he didn't phrase it the way a few way out CONs wished is on you.... :peace

Its not a slur to call a muslim fighting what he believes to be an islamic holy war a muslim terrorist, nor has it been.

Are you so blinded by PC dogma that you cant see that?
 
Just because you want to give ISIS what it wants, worldwide recognition that it is Islam's true representative and is fighting a muslim holy war against the west, does not mean Obama will go along with it. You can praise ISIS to the rooftops for their "religious purity" if you want but sane people will recognize them for the thugs and criminals they are.

Everyone knows who ISIS is, and not calling them what they are, while the POTUS talks about jobs bills for them only emboldens them. They know what they are doing.
 
Back
Top Bottom