Frantz Fanon
Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2015
- Messages
- 69
- Reaction score
- 11
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
They are Muslim barbarians.
No. Unless you think Fred Phelps is a Christian.
They are Muslim barbarians.
He just tried to lecture the world.....and now is looking like a major fool. Note how the fool still sticks to the term ISIL. Why everybody else in the World calls them what they are.
Blaming poverty while he points out how Billions in poverty don't ever cross the line into violence.
So basically what we have here.....is BO peep trying to appear like he doing something to combat the problem. While BO Peep talks confusingly to the rest of the world.....and showing the American People he will not be truthful and cannot be trusted.
Threads like this is proof that the average American IQ is declining. I would bet my house that 90 percent of the anti-Islam crowd has never read or research the Muslim faith.
Μολὼν λαβέ;1064332943 said:[/B]
You and the Obama administration know those people better than they know themselves. They're not Muslim? They aren't terrorizing and murdering innocent people because they are infidels. They aren't fighting for their religion to take over the world. Their actions have nothing to do with their religious beliefs?
What PC insight.
I will give Obama one thing, he's smarter than his ardent followers. He got you guys to believe it.
In light of all the media coverage, what would you like the anti-Islam crowd to know? Most Americans get their information from the TV and not necessarily a TV based news source.
It's not what I would like them to know. It's what they should know before condemning a whole religion as evil.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
You stated that the Right insists on BO using such language.....yet, he hasn't.
Threads like this is proof that the average American IQ is declining. I would bet my house that 90 percent of the anti-Islam crowd has never read or research the Muslim faith.
They do drag them around behind trucks though, and murder them from time to time.
That it happens at all is unacceptable. It just shows that extremist Christians are not unwilling to act.
Because the KKK isn't a Christian organization or anything. :roll:
Your turn.
The War Over U.S. War Crimes in Afghanistan Is Heating Up | Foreign Policy
List of US War Crimes
The indiscriminate use of bombs by the US, usually outside a declared war
situation, for wanton destruction, for no military objectives, whose
targets and victims are civilian populations, or what we now call
"collateral damage."
Japan (1945)
China (1945-46)
Korea & China (1950-53)
Guatemala (1954, 1960, 1967-69)
Indonesia (1958)
Cuba (1959-61)
Congo (1964)
Peru (1965)
Laos (1964-70)
Vietnam (1961-1973)
Cambodia (1969-70)
Grenada (1983)
Lebanon (1983-84)
Libya (1986)
El Salvador (1980s)
Nicaragua (1980s)
Iran (1987)
Panama (1989)
Iraq (1991-2000)
Kuwait (1991)
Somalia (1993)
Bosnia (1994-95)
Sudan (1998)
Afghanistan (1998)
Pakistan (1998)
Yugoslavia (1999)
Bulgaria (1999)
Macedonia (1999)
Whatever that meant.
Which of the aforementioned US war crimes was not under a self-professed Christian President? Work on your rhetoric and dig a little into US foreign policy over the past 200 years.
You listed everything the US was ever involved in as a war crime. I can't, nor have interest in discussing such extremist partisanism and anti-american propagandaness.
Not one of these was done "in the name of god".
Every one of those I listed, were/
Now this is a pretty accurate assessment of what Obama's doing here. Obama, being driven by is excessive PC (un)sensibilities, denies the fact that the Militant Islamic Fundamentalists of ISIS / ISIL are in fact justifying their actions as being dictated by their interpretation of the Islamic religion.
Factually, there are passages in the Koran that incite those with a fundamentalist interpretation of the writings to go and kill all non-Muslims, or so I am told (I've not read it and don't plan to). Further, it's been correctly observed that Muslims that don't observe these citations to murderous action, aren't 100% compliant to their own religious beliefs and their own religious doctrine. I'd be interested in how those that don't explain this away, the mental rationalization gymnastics would humorous to see.
I see this as a fine example of how excessive PC (un)sensibilities can easily, and more often than not, put you into a logical corner of inconsistencies, seriously degrading any credibility in the eyes of any critically thinking person.
Given this summary, I think it pretty clear that Islam most certainly is not a religion of peace in its writing and foundational documents and doctrine, however, I don't think the world would any problem with any Muslims that don't observe the Koran's citations to murderous action; and see this as the only avenue to peaceful co-existence with the rest of the world. So, I guess all the Imams that are denouncing their militant fundamentalist brethren, are, at the same time, denouncing those citations to murderous action in their own religion. No wonder it's taken them this long to do so, and as tepid their denunciations. The cognitive conflict within them on this point surely must be massive.
Lol, you thought that list was exhaustive!! And that didn't cover the covert hostilities conducted by our CIA.
You listed everything the US was ever involved in as a war crime. I can't, nor have interest in discussing such extremist partisanism and anti-american propagandaness.
Not one of these was done "in the name of god".
Every one of those I listed, were/
I think you should spend some time on the link and far more time on the historical record. Perhaps the whole "One Nation Under God" thing was missed after all these years.
'propagandaness':lamo
It's a stupid red herring. Why are we incapable of talking about the coming storm?
Ridicule equals strength?Considering the amount of abuse he's getting for not saying it, I'd say he's pretty strong.
Your point was that average anti-Islam person has not read or researched the religion. I then asked what would you like them to know. You then say it isn't what you want them to know, but it what they should know before condemning the whole religion.
I would say you want them to know that not all of Islam is evil. Is that correct?