Page 14 of 39 FirstFirst ... 4121314151624 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 382

Thread: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

  1. #131
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Between Athens and Jerusalem
    Last Seen
    05-18-16 @ 07:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobie View Post
    Please. It's not a "victim" thing at all. What else would YOU call someone who does nothing but baselessly smear "the left" 24-7? I thought conservatives actually fought for conservative principles, rather than sitting around whining about liberals.
    Kobie, you seem like a victim. You certainly sound like one.

  2. #132
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

    Quote Originally Posted by US Conservative View Post
    Kobie, Obama's lucky to have you here to "explain" what Obama really means, isnt he?
    No, you're lucky to have Kobie around to explain for you, lol.
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  3. #133
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Between Athens and Jerusalem
    Last Seen
    05-18-16 @ 07:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

    Quote Originally Posted by Moot View Post
    President Lincoln didn't recognize the Southern rebel uprising as a "war" either. If he had it would have legitimized the Southern seccession. It's the same with Obama refusing to give the jihadists any recognition for their uprising as well. In fact, we shouldn't even be calling them a state.
    We are in civil war. In such cases there always is a main question; but in this case that question is a perplexing compound -- Union and Slavery. It thus becomes a question not of two sides merely, but of at least four sides, even among those who are for the Union, saying nothing of those who are against it.

    Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.

    It is easy to see that, under the sharp discipline of civil war, the nation is beginning a new life.

    War at the best, is terrible, and this war of ours, in its magnitude and in its duration, is one of the most terrible.

    Both parties deprecated war; but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive; and the other would accept war rather than let it perish. And the war came .... Fondly do we hope -- fervently do we pray -- that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away.

    -All quotes by Abraham Lincoln
    Quotes by Abraham Lincoln

  4. #134
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Between Athens and Jerusalem
    Last Seen
    05-18-16 @ 07:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

    Quote Originally Posted by Moot View Post
    I guess I missed that part. Great minds think alike, eh? lol
    Try again.

  5. #135
    Sage

    vesper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Midwest
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:02 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    13,850

    Re: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

    Yesterday it was very apparent to most of us paying attention to this situation that we have an administration in charge of foreign affairs full of fruit loops.
    A president that can't even recognize the "root problem" nor bring himself to call it what it is, Islamic terrorism.

    But the lunacy isn't just at the White House, it is also loony tunes at the Pentagon.

    Pentagon Spokesperson Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby condemned Egypt and AEU airstrikes on ISIS in retaliation to 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians being beheaded and several more kidnapped for future executions by stating

    We discourage other nations from taking a part in Libya’s issues through violence. We want the issues solved in Libya to be done peacefully and through good governance and politics and not violence.
    WTF? What's wrong Admiral, you afraid you and the rest of this administration looks like a bunch of eunuchs while UAE, Jordan and Egypt show they have a pair of balls?

    And the insanity continued with the bimbo spokesperson for the State Department, Jen Pskai , flakes of all flakes stated...
    “Our concern here is about the fragile state of Libya’s political process,” Psaki replied. “We believe there isn’t a military solution. The political process is what the focus needs to be on, and hence the concern that we have.”
    They should have thought of that before they toppled Khadafi. And then she went on to state they have close ties in Libya even though we don't have a damn embassy operating there at this time.

    May God help us through the next 18 months.

    Pentagon: Egypt, UAE Attacking Islamists in Libya Differs From US Bombing ISIS in Iraq | CNS News

  6. #136
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Between Athens and Jerusalem
    Last Seen
    05-18-16 @ 07:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

    Quote Originally Posted by vesper View Post
    Yesterday it was very apparent to most of us paying attention to this situation that we have an administration in charge of foreign affairs full of fruit loops.
    A president that can't even recognize the "root problem" nor bring himself to call it what it is, Islamic terrorism.

    But the lunacy isn't just at the White House, it is also loony tunes at the Pentagon.

    Pentagon Spokesperson Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby condemned Egypt and AEU airstrikes on ISIS in retaliation to 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians being beheaded and several more kidnapped for future executions by stating



    WTF? What's wrong Admiral, you afraid you and the rest of this administration looks like a bunch of eunuchs while UAE, Jordan and Egypt show they have a pair of balls?

    And the insanity continued with the bimbo spokesperson for the State Department, Jen Pskai , flakes of all flakes stated...


    They should have thought of that before they toppled Khadafi. And then she went on to state they have close ties in Libya even though we don't have a damn embassy operating there at this time.

    May God help us through the next 18 months.

    Pentagon: Egypt, UAE Attacking Islamists in Libya Differs From US Bombing ISIS in Iraq | CNS News
    You have to be ****ing kidding me. They spoke out AGAINST the airstrikes?
    Who is really in the white house.

  7. #137
    Sage

    vesper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Midwest
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:02 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    13,850

    Re: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

    Quote Originally Posted by US Conservative View Post
    You have to be ****ing kidding me. They spoke out AGAINST the airstrikes?
    Who is really in the white house.
    Scary huh!

  8. #138
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

    Quote Originally Posted by US Conservative View Post
    Obama just had a "terrorism summit" where he couldn't say the words islamic terror as if thats not the real problem. If he does not think they are "real muslims" why do are they allowed to observe strict muslim religious rights in jail? Why is their food halal?

    You may not like it-but this is just a very literal interpretation of Islam they are adhering to, and its not confined to one locality-its a legitimate-if not extreme sect of Islam, just like fundamentalists or elsewhere.
    I can't see real leaders, such as FDR or Churchill, refusing to call 'Nazis' Germans. Neither would be concerned about 'legitimizing' Nazis or, in the case of Italy, Fascists. They were called what they are and there was none of this "Not all Germans are Nazis" whine.

    It should be evident by now, even without the latest 'selfie' video, that Barrack Obama is a complete buffoon.

  9. #139
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

    Quote Originally Posted by vesper View Post
    Yesterday it was very apparent to most of us paying attention to this situation that we have an administration in charge of foreign affairs full of fruit loops.
    A president that can't even recognize the "root problem" nor bring himself to call it what it is, Islamic terrorism.

    But the lunacy isn't just at the White House, it is also loony tunes at the Pentagon.

    Pentagon Spokesperson Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby condemned Egypt and AEU airstrikes on ISIS in retaliation to 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians being beheaded and several more kidnapped for future executions by stating



    WTF? What's wrong Admiral, you afraid you and the rest of this administration looks like a bunch of eunuchs while UAE, Jordan and Egypt show they have a pair of balls?

    And the insanity continued with the bimbo spokesperson for the State Department, Jen Pskai , flakes of all flakes stated...


    They should have thought of that before they toppled Khadafi. And then she went on to state they have close ties in Libya even though we don't have a damn embassy operating there at this time.

    May God help us through the next 18 months.

    Pentagon: Egypt, UAE Attacking Islamists in Libya Differs From US Bombing ISIS in Iraq | CNS News
    The claim that “We want the issues solved in Libya to be done peacefully and through good governance and politics and not violence” overlooks the fact that Gaddafi was removed by Obama through an act of extreme violence. We seem to have entered another dimension.

  10. #140
    Sage
    Moot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:31 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    27,460

    Re: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit

    Quote Originally Posted by US Conservative View Post
    We are in civil war. In such cases there always is a main question; but in this case that question is a perplexing compound -- Union and Slavery. It thus becomes a question not of two sides merely, but of at least four sides, even among those who are for the Union, saying nothing of those who are against it.

    Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.

    It is easy to see that, under the sharp discipline of civil war, the nation is beginning a new life.

    War at the best, is terrible, and this war of ours, in its magnitude and in its duration, is one of the most terrible.

    Both parties deprecated war; but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive; and the other would accept war rather than let it perish. And the war came .... Fondly do we hope -- fervently do we pray -- that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away.

    -All quotes by Abraham Lincoln
    Quotes by Abraham Lincoln

    "...During the war, Northerners and Southerners sometimes used the uncapitalized phrase “civil war” as a declarative description of the mess in which they found themselves, but Civil War was not yet a proper noun. “Now we are engaged in a great civil war,” President Lincoln famously declared in the Gettysburg Address. Less famously, Lt. James Langhorne of the 4th Virginia Infantry lamented to his mother, “I think our country is doomed to a civil war of years duration.” Throughout the struggle Confederates likewise spoke of the “civil war,” or just “this war.”....

    Lincoln understood the importance of semantics. “It might seem, at first thought, to be of little difference whether the present movement at the South be called ‘secession’ or ‘rebellion,’” he told Congress in July 1861. “The movers, however, well understand the difference.” Lincoln thought that secession was an act of rebellion against democratic self-government. .....

    Rebellion had profound constitutional implications. Calling secession a rebellion enabled the government to put into motion the constitutional machinery of war to “suppress Insurrections,” according to the Constitution’s Article I, Section 8. Article I, Section 9 allowed the suspension of habeas corpus “in Cases of Rebellion.” .....

    Seeing the conflict as a rebellion implied an ambivalent policy toward civilians. If the Union was fighting a rebellion led by a handful of traitors, and not another sovereign nation, then civilians in the rebelling states ought not to be assumed to be enemies, as they must be if they were governed by a sovereign nation with legitimate claim to their allegiance...."

    http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...e-of-war/?_r=0

Page 14 of 39 FirstFirst ... 4121314151624 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •