- Joined
- Jun 13, 2010
- Messages
- 22,676
- Reaction score
- 4,282
- Location
- DC Metro
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Today you mean?
Today.
Today you mean?
They may be a threat to US power, hegemony, or influence. But nothing more.
At best, Russia is a threat to Kiev. How exactly is Russia Americas biggest threat??
A regional war with NATO/EU does not qualify as a serious/dangerous geopolitical threat in your eyes?
BBC News - Russia 'danger' to Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia - Fallon
Um, say again?
Are you pushing for isolationism? Do you think there is no need for the United Nations? International Law?
Who is going to support and defend our allies....if we don't?
That's not the US dude, hate to point that out.
What morons would push for that? Oh wait, I know.
I guess 'someone' needs to learn the definition of 'geopolitical'.
They may be a threat to US power, hegemony, or influence. But nothing more.
No, blaming everything about the break up of Yugoslavia on Russia, and ignoring the role that the US/NATO and the IMF played is.
In my posts you can find the reverse. I blame pro-Russian attitude for the making of Yugoslavia, while I not only accept (i.e., do not ignore) the role of US/NATO and IMF played on the break up but I accept and welcome such a liberating development.
That sentiment of yours has been apparent. That doesn't change the very fact that there were others who didn't welcome US/NATO and IMF interference, and were not its beneficiaries.