• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Isis beheads 21 christians, promises to ‘conquer rome, by allah’s permission

Well, since we had a deal.

I posted some clarifications on post 6 also, but here:

ISIS is beheading and burning people. Among signs that show the degree that they are proud to commit such medieval religious acts can also be shown by the superb quality of their videos. They do not want us to miss even the finest detail of such horrific acts as expressed with the finest/smallest digital pixel that took the colors for blood and fire. This shows that their intent to present what they are doing is sound and considering that they have not been stopping then they may continue.

Each time they behead and burn people from various parts of the world the more they provoke a reprisal from military people from those parts of the world. They did not stated that they will stop, so at one point it reaches the boiling point and countries join to go against these medieval bustards.

The repeated pattern is that ISIS have consistently provoked many countries (i.e., asked for it). Now perhaps they may even get what they were asking for.

Subduing them would be bloody and difficult because in their religiously zombified state they do not care if they die. The reverse actually, they think they will be rewarded with heaven if they die in the battlefield. This may be the reason why they provoke their own demise basically, so as they can at last enjoy brief seconds-minutes of mortification, with images ready from their unconscious to portray images of their desire (i.e., asking for it).

But even then, if they are subdued and controlled, the idea to turn them over to Assad is wrong for he is not any better with his cleansing operations. How about we give the territories over to Iraq instead? They are secular and under the influence, and it may be a rewarding sign for cooperating with us?

In return, Iraq has to recognize our independence though! No more good old relationships with Serbia, they ought to move above such dictatorship and cleansing methodologies as were used in medieval times, and create new relationship with healthier countries such as us and other countries in the world.

Ask me more questions if you did not get me again.

Oh, ok. So when you said, "well they freaking asked for it", you were speaking of the Islamic State fighters? And not the Christians being beheaded, right? As to your assertion that Iraq is secular, :doh
 
Oh, ok. So when you said, "well they freaking asked for it", you were speaking of the Islamic State fighters? And not the Christians being beheaded, right? As to your assertion that Iraq is secular, :doh

Continue...
 
Now that, I really don't understand. Lol.

You just stated that Iraq is not secular and followed it with an emoticon " :doh " Surely an emoticon is not enough! So I asked you to continue and support the statement with references in addition to emoticons.
 
There is no cause for the savage activity of these people. They have the same justification as the Nazi's did. They are animals, nothing more.
 
As if you would want to lift a finger to stop ISIS if they were executing atheists instead

In my humble opinion your read on that particular forum member is 180 degrees out of phase.
 
You just stated that Iraq is not secular and followed it with an emoticon " :doh " Surely an emoticon is not enough! So I asked you to continue and support the statement with references in addition to emoticons.

Oh, I see, that's reasonable enough.

Iraq is the first Arab country to be ruled by a Shia government since Saladin overthrew the Fatimids in Egypt in 1171. But Shia rule is deeply troubled, and Shia leaders have been unable to share power in a stable way that satisfies the Sunni, the Kurds and even the Shia community.

The Shia are in power in Iraq
 
Well I hope ISIS don't conquer Rome before this September because I'm booked up for a holiday there then :wink:
 
There is no cause for the savage activity of these people. They have the same justification as the Nazi's did. They are animals, nothing more.

No, they're people. Animals don't behave like they do.
 
Oh, I see, that's reasonable enough.

Iraq is the first Arab country to be ruled by a Shia government since Saladin overthrew the Fatimids in Egypt in 1171. But Shia rule is deeply troubled, and Shia leaders have been unable to share power in a stable way that satisfies the Sunni, the Kurds and even the Shia community.

The Shia are in power in Iraq

This PM has been a lot more "secular" and inclusive of the Sunnis than his divisive predecessor.
 
This PM has been a lot more "secular" and inclusive of the Sunnis than his divisive predecessor.

The religious Shia sect including the religious Sunni sect does not make the two seemingly cooperatives secular.
 
There is no cause for the savage activity of these people. They have the same justification as the Nazi's did. They are animals, nothing more.

Don't be so hard on animals, because these guys are far far worse than those :(
 
Obama has that lying POS Susan Rice out on the stump claiming the 21 beheadings were caused by a movie carried out by over zealous film critics.
 
Obama has that lying POS Susan Rice out on the stump claiming the 21 beheadings were caused by a movie carried out by over zealous film critics.

How very ISIS of you. A warped misrepresentation of reality.
 
How very ISIS of you. A warped misrepresentation of reality.

1) It has now been proven that the WH knew it was a coordinated terrorist attack within 24-48 hours and yet Susan Rice lied through her pie-hole for weeks after. NEXT.
 
1) It has now been proven that the WH knew it was a coordinated terrorist attack within 24-48 hours and yet Susan Rice lied through her pie-hole for weeks after. NEXT.

I could really go for some pie right now. Starving.
 
I've been shot at for my countrymen, I didn't ask to only be shot at only for those who believe in a god. kind of a ****ty thing to say to Goshin.

it's only ****ty if it's untrue. If they had executed 21 atheists, who they hate just as much as christians, he wouldn't have replied at all, much less thrown a fit
 
for more:
Libya and Egypt launch air strikes against Isis after militants post beheadings video | World news | The Guardian





So lets talk about the Templars and the Crusades, because dawdling on the past will address this current reality.




"At least 21 Egyptians were kidnapped in two separate incidents in the city of Sirte, Libya in December and January. "




If your are not a muslim and still hanging around where these savages ISIS are, you are an idiot.


[/FONT]
[/INDENT]



the only westerners who should be hanging around where ISIS are well trained professional killers looking to waste as many of those scumbags as they possibly can
 
Oh, I see, that's reasonable enough.

Iraq is the first Arab country to be ruled by a Shia government since Saladin overthrew the Fatimids in Egypt in 1171. But Shia rule is deeply troubled, and Shia leaders have been unable to share power in a stable way that satisfies the Sunni, the Kurds and even the Shia community.

The Shia are in power in Iraq

It was secular before Saddam:

Until the 1970s nearly all Iraq's political organisations were secular, attracting people from all religions and none. The dividing lines were sharply political, mostly based on social class and political orientation. The growth of religious parties followed Saddam's ruthless elimination of all political entities other than the Ba'ath party. Places of worship became centres of political agitation and organisation.

Thought the US lead intervention would turn Iraq back to that pre-1970's secular era, but it seems the intervention only exacerbated the problem:

The most serious sectarian and ethnic tensions in Iraq's modern history followed the 2003 US-led occupation, which faced massive popular opposition and resistance. The US had its own divide-and-rule policy, promoting Iraqi organisations founded on religion, ethnicity, nationality or sect rather than politics. Many senior officers in the newly formed Iraqi army came from these organisations and Saddam's army. This was exacerbated three years ago, when sectarian groups in Syria were backed by the US, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar

References:

The sectarian myth of Iraq | Sami Ramadani | Comment is free | The Guardian
 
Left wing antisemitism is on a par with neo-Nazi and white nationalist antisemtism, so no suprises here. As for 'neutrality', it's just another euphemism for supporting genocide against Israeli Jews and Christians both. The 'neutrality' meme isn't even remotely neutral re real life consequences.
 
it's only ****ty if it's untrue. If they had executed 21 atheists, who they hate just as much as christians, he wouldn't have replied at all, much less thrown a fit



Bull****, you have no evidence of this other than your personal bigotry which isn't evidence at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom