Navy Pride
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 39,883
- Reaction score
- 3,070
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
In what respect?Two bad the two lawyers who wrote letters to the LA Times from the whole city of LA and surrounding areas of LA are wrong.
In what respect?
The Alabama opinion failed to demonstrate any causal link (aka rational relation) between banning same sex marriages and the cited government interests. That is to say, the ban doesn't actually further those interests in any way. They are not rationally related. The reasoning is not sound in any way. It is completely without legal basis or factual support and is ultimately just an arbitrary decision based on this one unelected official's personal prejudices.
The probate judge that was the subject of the Thursday hearing has begun issuing licenses in response to the order. The end of this fight is clear so don't fret! =)
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/13/us/alabama-same-sex-marriage-ruling.html
In all likelihood, yes. But Granade presides only over the southern portion of the state, so technically-speaking, most of the probate judges in the state are not required to abide by the decision, and cannot be forced to do so per this district court ruling.The probate judge that was the subject of the Thursday hearing has begun issuing licenses in response to the order. The end of this fight is clear so don't fret! =)
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/13/us/alabama-same-sex-marriage-ruling.html
The NY times that liberal rag is your source.:rofl why not link MOVEOn.org? they are just as creditable.
How are letters to the editor news exactly?