• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New agency to sniff out threats in cyberspace

One of the only ideas of O's I support. I'd have a huge technology platform if I was a politician.
 
I don't mind the mission, but I don't see the necessity of adding another agency to accomplish it.
 
Thrilla said:
I don't mind the mission, but I don't see the necessity of adding another agency to accomplish it.
Click to expand...

Ditto! It's a known fact the bigger the agency or the more agenies there are the less effective they are. It gets to the point where there is so much bureaucracy they are grossly inefficient. And that doesn't include the interagency competition and exclusiveness that makes them incompetent to handle a threat.

Yeah yeah I know they are all supposed to cooperate and share intell but I don't buy it for a minute. Whenever there are egos and the need to justify budgets for their agency, you can bet they won't necessarily cooperate.
 
Thrilla said:
I don't mind the mission, but I don't see the necessity of adding another agency to accomplish it.
Click to expand...

I concur.

As EnigmaO01 pointed out, we have 17 different intel agencies. Do we really another one?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom