Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 146

Thread: Congress probing White House role in FCC chief's net-neutrality plan

  1. #91
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,396

    Re: Congress probing White House role in FCC chief's net-neutrality plan

    Quote Originally Posted by FreedomFromAll View Post
    Internet chain meme's are a very bad argument. So do you believe all meme's or just this one? Are you one of those annoying people that share's every insipid chain meme that comes cross your path?

    if you note, I used a picture demonstrating the differences, that's not a meme actually, but you should also consider the post made. unles of course your goal was to be snotty to me, then, kudos sir, sucess!
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  2. #92
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,396

    Re: Congress probing White House role in FCC chief's net-neutrality plan

    Quote Originally Posted by FreedomFromAll View Post
    Ok what proof do you have?


    *sigh* we can start with a bill being called "net neutrality" that is anything but.
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  3. #93
    Anti political parties
    FreedomFromAll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    New Mexico USA
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 03:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,040

    Re: Congress probing White House role in FCC chief's net-neutrality plan

    Quote Originally Posted by ReverendHellh0und View Post
    *sigh* we can start with a bill being called "net neutrality" that is anything but.
    How do you know Have you read it?

  4. #94
    Anti political parties
    FreedomFromAll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    New Mexico USA
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 03:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,040

    Re: Congress probing White House role in FCC chief's net-neutrality plan

    Quote Originally Posted by ReverendHellh0und View Post
    if you note, I used a picture demonstrating the differences, that's not a meme actually, but you should also consider the post made. unles of course your goal was to be snotty to me, then, kudos sir, sucess!
    The whole thing played like a meme, so not being snotty.

  5. #95
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,396

    Re: Congress probing White House role in FCC chief's net-neutrality plan

    Quote Originally Posted by FreedomFromAll View Post
    How do you know Have you read it?
    I've read about it, us rabble are not allowed to read what plans the ruling class has for us! how dare you sir!
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  6. #96
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,396

    Re: Congress probing White House role in FCC chief's net-neutrality plan

    Quote Originally Posted by FreedomFromAll View Post
    The whole thing played like a meme, so not being snotty.


    okie dokie
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  7. #97
    Anti political parties
    FreedomFromAll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    New Mexico USA
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 03:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,040

    Re: Congress probing White House role in FCC chief's net-neutrality plan

    Quote Originally Posted by ReverendHellh0und View Post
    I've read about it, us rabble are not allowed to read what plans the ruling class has for us! how dare you sir!
    Well I agree that it should be navigable. But you cant claim to know what it says without being able to read it. You must then be making assumptions.

  8. #98
    Anti political parties
    FreedomFromAll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    New Mexico USA
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 03:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,040

    Re: Congress probing White House role in FCC chief's net-neutrality plan

    Quote Originally Posted by ReverendHellh0und View Post
    I've read about it, us rabble are not allowed to read what plans the ruling class has for us! how dare you sir!
    Well I agree that it should be available. But you cant claim to know what it says without being able to read it. You must then be making assumptions.

  9. #99
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,396

    Re: Congress probing White House role in FCC chief's net-neutrality plan

    Quote Originally Posted by FreedomFromAll View Post
    Well I agree that it should be navigable. But you cant claim to know what it says without being able to read it. You must then be making assumptions.
    based on what has been said about it by those who have read it, yes.

    I did the same thing with the health care bill, that's kinda what we do.
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  10. #100
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Tennessee
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:33 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    21,730

    Re: Congress probing White House role in FCC chief's net-neutrality plan

    Quote Originally Posted by Excon View Post
    You clearly do not understand what has been said then.

    Classifying the internet as such would subject it to the 16.1% charge. As a requirement it is not a "could".
    Wrong. See Universal Service Support Mechanisms | FCC.gov for example.

    How Much Do Companies Contribute for Universal Service?

    Companies contribute a certain percentage of the amount billed to their residential and business customers for interstate and international calls. The exact percentage that companies contribute is adjusted every quarter based on projected demand for Universal Service funding.
    So let's assume that regulating the internet under Title II REQUIRES that the FCC charges an identical tax on internet services as it does now on phone services. That's false, of course, but we can assume it.

    In any case, the FCC has a budget and needs to collect $X.XX dollars to fund USF activities, and it sets the percentage each quarter to the amount needed to meet those revenue goals. If we added internet charges to the tax base, the tax rate necessary to collect $X.XX in revenues would fall dramatically because the tax base would expand dramatically. So with a larger base, the rate wouldn't be 16.1% but some rate far smaller.

    As you were already informed, the information has already been provided. Find it and avail yourself of it.
    I keep doing that and keep proving you wrong....

Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •