• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Charges dismissed in Arizona Iced Tea arrest outside Fayetteville liquor store

Excon said:
Irrelevant.
A person confronted on the streets only has to verbally ID their self when asked by police.
When engaged in an activity that requires a license, such as driving, you must produce the license when requested.

As this happened on the streets (so to say) the officer performed both verbal and flashed his badge.
Which is sufficient.

Which has absolutely nothing to do with ID'ing your self for such an activity like voting.
Click to expand...

The police have no business busting in unless they have reason to believe a law is being broken. What law was this person breaking, and why would the officer go ahead with an arrest when it became clear no law was broken?
 
Excon said:
Stick to the arguments I made.
Click to expand...

That is the argument you made. You argued that the cop had no obligation to show he was an officer, but that the person was wrong for not complying with his demands.
 
Excon said:
Doesn't matter what you can fully see or not.
It was shown and they clearly understood they were dealing with a cop.
Click to expand...


So you would teach your family members to submit to a cop who behaved like that.

Ex-con who posed as cop busted in Brooklyn rape - NY Daily News

and that mother****er had a badge.


You are engaged in exaggeration. Just stop. they clearly knew they were dealing with a cop.
Click to expand...


no, they took him at face value and accepted that he was a cop. that was thier mistake.
 
Excon said:
Doesn't matter what you can fully see or not.
It was shown and they clearly understood they were dealing with a cop.




You are engaged in exaggeration. Just stop. they clearly knew they were dealing with a cop.
Click to expand...




How so? I was a city kid, I don't fall for claims by random strangers.
 
Hatuey said:
Charges dismissed in Arizona Iced Tea arrest outside Fayetteville liquor store - Fayetteville Observer: Local News



Alright, this was unconstitutional... now what? Can we get to the bottom of why a guy dressed in normal clothes can arrest you just by saying he is a cop? If he had punched this guy out, would he have been defending himself or assaulting an officer? Is saying that he's an officer all it takes for someone to simply do as he says?
Click to expand...

Punishment for wrong doings by cops rarely happens.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
So you would teach your family members to submit to a cop who behaved like that.

Ex-con who posed as cop busted in Brooklyn rape - NY Daily News

and that mother****er had a badge.
Click to expand...
Irrelevant to the fact that you made a false claim.
He ID'd himself and later showed his badge to them.

End of story. In regards to that specific claim you were wrong.
Get over it.



ReverendHellh0und said:
no,
Click to expand...
Yes you were engaged in exaggeration. You wouldn't have beat anybody down.
 
rocket88 said:
That is the argument you made. You argued that the cop had no obligation to show he was an officer, but that the person was wrong for not complying with his demands.
Click to expand...
:doh
:lamo
You might want to quote what I actually said, as what I said and what you think I said are two different things.


rocket88 said:
The police have no business busting in unless they have reason to believe a law is being broken. What law was this person breaking, and why would the officer go ahead with an arrest when it became clear no law was broken?
Click to expand...
Busting in? Wtf are you talking about? :doh

The rest is irrelevant to the argument I made and are engaged in. Do you really not know that? :doh D'oh!
 
Excon said:
Verbally ID'ing oneself is ID'ing your self.
Click to expand...

Bwahahahaha!!! Try that next time a cop asks to see your ID.

"No I did officer, I flashed it, was that too fast? Sorry, some guy on the internet said thats okay"

Bend over more for the police state, please.
 
Excon said:
Irrelevant to the fact that you made a false claim.
He ID'd himself and later showed his badge to them.

End of story. In regards to that specific claim you were wrong.
Get over it.
Click to expand...

everytime you reply to me I'm going to ask you.

So you would teach your family members to submit to a cop who behaved like that.

Ex-con who posed as cop busted in Brooklyn rape - NY Daily News

and that mother****er had a badge.



Yes you were engaged in exaggeration. You wouldn't have beat anybody down.
Click to expand...


You know me? I was a rather pugnacious kid.... lol
 
Lachean said:
Bwahahahaha!!! Try that next time a cop asks to see your ID.

"No I did officer, I flashed it, was that too fast? Sorry, some guy on the internet said thats okay"

Bend over more for the police state, please.
Click to expand...
You lack of knowledge is showing.
On the street, when you are asked for ID by police, all that is required is a verbal response.

I do not care what you think of it, that is all that is required.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
everytime you reply to me I'm going to ask you.

So you would teach your family members to submit to a cop who behaved like that.

Ex-con who posed as cop busted in Brooklyn rape - NY Daily News

and that mother****er had a badge.
Click to expand...

I see you do not understand what is relevant. What a shame.
Again.
Irrelevant to the fact that you made a false claim.
He ID'd himself and later showed his badge to them.

End of story. In regards to that specific claim you were wrong.
Get over it.​

Your false claim is what the argument was over. You were proven wrong.
He did ID himself and he did shown his badge.
There is no other argument between us and I am not engaging in any.
So try as you may to go off on a tangent, I will not be engaging you in it.
Or do you not understand that?
 
Excon said:
I see you do not understand what is relevant. What a shame.
Again.
Irrelevant to the fact that you made a false claim.
He ID'd himself and later showed his badge to them.

End of story. In regards to that specific claim you were wrong.
Get over it.​

Your false claim is what the argument was over. You were proven wrong.
He did ID himself and he did shown his badge.
There is no other argument between us and I am not engaging in any.
So try as you may to go off on a tangent, I will not be engaging you in it.
Or do you not understand that?
Click to expand...



So you would teach your family members to submit to a "cop" who behaved like that in a dark parking lot?
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
So you would teach your family members to submit to a "cop" who behaved like that in a dark parking lot?
Click to expand...
I see you are incapable of understanding what you have been told. Figures. :doh
 
Excon said:
I see you are incapable of understanding what you have been told. Figures. :doh
Click to expand...

So you would teach your family members to submit to a "cop" who behaved like that in a dark parking lot?



you don't answer because you know I am right, and if I am right and it would not be a good idea to have a family member go with a man who behaved like this, it throws out your own arguments....


I accept the concession.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
So you would teach your family members to submit to a "cop" who behaved like that in a dark parking lot?



you don't answer because you know I am right, and if I am right and it would not be a good idea to have a family member go with a man who behaved like this, it throws out your own arguments....


I accept the concession.
Click to expand...
Wrong.

I never made any statement relevant to what you ask, and it is therefore irrelevant.

Telling you it is irrelevant is not a concession. It is telling you it is irrelevant to what has been argued.
You fail to understand that so you continue asking what is irrelevant. :doh D'oh!

Sorry, but you do not get to dictate what I discuss.

The argument was about your false claim. You were wrong, as shown.
Nothing you say is gong to change that or deflect away from it.
 
Excon said:
Wrong.

I never made any statement relevant to what you ask, and it is therefore irrelevant.

Telling you it is irrelevant is not a concession. It is telling you it is irrelevant to what has been argued.
You fail to understand that so you continue asking what is irrelevant. :doh D'oh!

Sorry, but you do not get to dictate what I discuss.

The argument was about your false claim. You were wrong, as shown.
Nothing you say is gong to change that or deflect away from it.
Click to expand...



screaming "irrelevant" does not make it so.,
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
**** that, if I'm doing nothing wrong, I'm not going to prostrate myself to some yahoo cop on a power trip.





Could have cost him his life, justifiable homicide.
Click to expand...



As a CHL holder, you have to have MORE respect for cops and others with guns.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
ahhh no respect. poooor wittle..... copper.... maybe they have group meeting for feelings.


I don't have to respect a cop who doesn't respect the constitution.

****, no where does it say I have to respect any government employee... Though I do as long as I get the same.
Click to expand...

Hope you enjoy prison with that attitude.
 
WCH said:
Hope you enjoy prison with that attitude.
Click to expand...



Given your servitude and prostration to the state, I would offer that you spend every day in a prison.




me..

d15d4f50d2a24db05dab2e27667c52a1.jpg





Besides, tell me what are the felonies I can be charged with for being mean to a cop who's being a doosh to me?
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
btw this "hip-hopper" is a veteran, he was a staff sergeant in the 82nd airborne.
Click to expand...

Then he should have known better than to interfere with the cops investigation or ignore orders.

Look I hate bad cops. I hate big government but, when placed in a position of having my ass kicked or going to jail, I'm best served cooperating and complying.

I would have got in my friggin car and left. No harm No foul...
 
Hatuey said:
Charges dismissed in Arizona Iced Tea arrest outside Fayetteville liquor store - Fayetteville Observer: Local News



Alright, this was unconstitutional... now what? Can we get to the bottom of why a guy dressed in normal clothes can arrest you just by saying he is a cop? If he had punched this guy out, would he have been defending himself or assaulting an officer? Is saying that he's an officer all it takes for someone to simply do as he says?
Click to expand...

Let's have a look at the video evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gILdC7KGXw

Where's the badge first of all?

Where is probable cause?

In my book the cop does 6 months
 
OrphanSlug said:
Agreed, this was a garbage arrest. The entire confrontation was avoidable, "trespassing and resisting a public officer" is absurd. Now that the criminal case has been dismissed, I suspect a lawsuit against the officer is on the way.
Click to expand...

Hopefully.

This guy does not deserve to be a cop
 
Lachean said:
Bwahahahaha!!! Try that next time a cop asks to see your ID.

"No I did officer, I flashed it, was that too fast? Sorry, some guy on the internet said thats okay"

Bend over more for the police state, please.
Click to expand...

When it comes to Cop vs Joe citizen...we're already there.

Best you can do is not rock the boat when you are engaged with an officer of the law... you can't win (unless of course you like having your ass kicked and being taken to jail)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom