The Crowd is not the sum of its parts.
if it's true, it's indefensible... though i have no doubts some will try to defend it ( as some already are)
folks who pull these kind of stunts have no place educating our children, period....end of story.... such people simply cannot be trusted.
To her Wall Street owners: Hillary Clinton: “But if everybody's watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. so, you need both a public and a private position.” - Hillary Clinton: "I'm kind of far removed from the struggles of the Middle Class"
BTW, the people you're saying are getting a 'safe harbor' are children. Yeah, that's awful we're treating them humanly.
First, can you show me one such Republican that wants to abolish all assistance to the poor?But you WILL find Republicans who complain helping those who are poor is a waste of money.
Second, does that one Republican, assuming you find one, validate the blanket statement?
False. Again, patently false.I understand what you're saying. You're saying Republicans don't mind helping those who truly need it but don't want to help those who are lazy. I get it. But the Republican message has long been "it's not the government's job to help".
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he stops voting for the Free Fish party.
I and others disagree with you, that IS the nature of debate. Now, if you could address in an adult way what it is about this "poll" that is any way NOT propaganda.
Start with the limited and obviously left wing oriented options...if this is a survey where is "give to the poor with financial responsibility", instead it rests on a them of not at all, which is no one's ideology not matter how many times you insist every Republican on the face of the earth wants no help.
"Small people talk about people, average people talk about events, great people talk about ideas" Eleanor Roosevelt