Page 2 of 43 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 428

Thread: Iran's Khamenei says could accept fair nuclear compromise

  1. #11
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Iran's Khamenei says could accept fair nuclear compromise

    Quote Originally Posted by Morality Games View Post
    Other than simple self appointment, nobody has no authority to do anything.
    Ok. So you're arguing that the US does, or doesn't have the authority to decide whether Iran has a military nuclear capability? Never mind the fact that Iran has maintained the civilian nature of the program all along!
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  2. #12
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Iran's Khamenei says could accept fair nuclear compromise

    Quote Originally Posted by Luftwaffe View Post
    We were never worried about being attacked by Iran...

    #1 They probably couldn't even make a missile with that much range, and if they could they could only make 1-2 maybe even 3 at best.

    #2 we have a triple layered defense system that would shoot the pitiful missiles down.

    You are wrong, jog is right. Iran never will have the capability to directly damage us in any way (outside of possibly hacking a couple US companies), including nuclear.
    So, are you arguing that a militarily nuclear armed Iran is no threat to the US, if so, I'll agree with you. Nevertheless, it would be my preference that ALL nukes were destroyed.
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  3. #13
    cynical class clown
    Luftwaffe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    CONNECTICUT
    Last Seen
    11-18-17 @ 10:49 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    10,499

    Re: Iran's Khamenei says could accept fair nuclear compromise

    Quote Originally Posted by Montecresto View Post
    So, are you arguing that a militarily nuclear armed Iran is no threat to the US, if so, I'll agree with you. Nevertheless, it would be my preference that ALL nukes were destroyed.
    I would love for Iran to try to nuke us.

    Not only would it be futile, but it would open up reason for us to nuke their pitiful asses into the stone age.

    You'd never hear about Ahmadinejad or whoever the hell runs Iran for a whole millennium since it'd just be a desolate wasteland.

    IOW, a nuclear armed Iran is of no threat to us for many reasons.

    Your preference will never be a reality, but I'm sure you knew that anyway.
    -----MOS 19D = cavalry scout = best damn MOS there is

  4. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last Seen
    08-18-15 @ 09:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,974

    Re: Iran's Khamenei says could accept fair nuclear compromise

    Quote Originally Posted by Luftwaffe View Post
    We were never worried about being attacked by Iran...

    #1 They probably couldn't even make a missile with that much range, and if they could they could only make 1-2 maybe even 3 at best.

    #2 we have a triple layered defense system that would shoot the pitiful missiles down.

    You are wrong, jog is right. Iran never will have the capability to directly damage us in any way (outside of possibly hacking a couple US companies), including nuclear.
    No I am not wrong. Although much of what you have posted is indeed correct, Iran's nuclear capabilities are an issue for us as the Middle East is of strategic importance to us. As a result of that, the U.S. may indeed feel the need to one day engage Iran militarily, and at that point it would be a threat. But that is a potential threat only, and as such, that is no reason to preclude a nuclear deal. But it is certainly erroneous to not factor that into the equation.

  5. #15
    Sage

    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Last Seen
    02-08-17 @ 04:58 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    6,639

    Re: Iran's Khamenei says could accept fair nuclear compromise

    Quote Originally Posted by Luftwaffe View Post
    I would love for Iran to try to nuke us.

    Not only would it be futile, but it would open up reason for us to nuke their pitiful asses into the stone age.

    You'd never hear about Ahmadinejad or whoever the hell runs Iran for a whole millennium since it'd just be a desolate wasteland.

    IOW, a nuclear armed Iran is of no threat to us for many reasons.

    Your preference will never be a reality, but I'm sure you knew that anyway.

    Wow, so refreshing to see someone actually hoping for nuclear war and the massive killing of a nation's citizenry, not to mention a desire to see $10 a gallon gas.

  6. #16
    cynical class clown
    Luftwaffe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    CONNECTICUT
    Last Seen
    11-18-17 @ 10:49 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    10,499

    Re: Iran's Khamenei says could accept fair nuclear compromise

    Quote Originally Posted by SlevinKelevra View Post
    Wow, so refreshing to see someone actually hoping for nuclear war and the massive killing of a nation's citizenry, not to mention a desire to see $10 a gallon gas.
    Sure thing mam.

    Everyone knows I'm terribly biased when it comes to the ME, I disclosed that publicly. Always feel free to ignore me when it comes to the ME.
    -----MOS 19D = cavalry scout = best damn MOS there is

  7. #17
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Iran's Khamenei says could accept fair nuclear compromise

    Quote Originally Posted by Luftwaffe View Post
    I would love for Iran to try to nuke us.

    Not only would it be futile, but it would open up reason for us to nuke their pitiful asses into the stone age.

    You'd never hear about Ahmadinejad or whoever the hell runs Iran for a whole millennium since it'd just be a desolate wasteland.

    IOW, a nuclear armed Iran is of no threat to us for many reasons.

    Your preference will never be a reality, but I'm sure you knew that anyway.
    I think my preference is unlikely, sure, but you're still young with a round face and have yet to learn never to say never. Nevertheless, many things in history have taken place despite the declarations that they never would. Now then, as to your other comment, what of the millions of mostly young (Iran is composed of a comparatively young demographic) Iranians that would be vaporised, were you to get your wish, and things like all the flora and fauna, that you can't possibly be accusing of contributing to the miserable place you consider Iran to be. And the environmental impact on Iran's neighbours. I'm sure you're too young to remember the huge outpouring of support the US received from Iran on the heels of the 9/11 attacks, that dissipated only after the "decider" declared that Iran was the third leg in the "axis of evil".
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  8. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Iran's Khamenei says could accept fair nuclear compromise

    Quote Originally Posted by Montecresto View Post
    Iran has maintained from jump street that their nuclear program is commercial and not military in nature.
    Yet, in defiance of a UN treaty, broke it with regard over the firing and testing of Ballistic Missiles. Including last year.

    Then decided to try and obtain parts that they weren't suppose to be trying to obtain. Even enough for BO's own people to file a compliant with the UN, only to back off due to BO and his desperation for a deal.

  9. #19
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Iran's Khamenei says could accept fair nuclear compromise

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Yet, in defiance of a UN treaty, broke it with regard over the firing and testing of Ballistic Missiles. Including last year.

    Then decided to try and obtain parts that they weren't suppose to be trying to obtain. Even enough for BO's own people to file a compliant with the UN, only to back off due to BO and his desperation for a deal.
    You mean a government might actually profess one thing publicly, and pursue a different path privately? Ok, I'll buy that.
    Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy

  10. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Iran's Khamenei says could accept fair nuclear compromise

    Quote Originally Posted by Montecresto View Post
    You mean a government might actually profess one thing publicly, and pursue a different path privately? Ok, I'll buy that.

    Yeah, and then know they were doing it with purpose and deliberate intent.


    Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) criticized the Obama administration’s Iran rhetoric for sounding “like talking points that come straight out of Tehran” and supporting “the Iranian narrative of victimization” before a Senate hearing on Wednesday.....snip~

    Menendez: Obama Iran Rhetoric Sounds 'Straight Out Of Tehran' - Breitbart



    Iran's parliament has started to draft a law that would allow the country's nuclear scientists to intensify their uranium enrichment, a step that could complicate ongoing talks with world powers. The move, announced Saturday by parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, comes after U.S. lawmakers said they were planning legislation that could place new sanctions on Iran. "This bill will allow the government to continue enrichment, using new generation centrifuges," he said, referring to more modern machines that would speed up production.....snip~

    Iran Lawmakers Drafting Law on Nuclear Enrichment Hike

Page 2 of 43 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •