• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Exclusive: Secret tapes undermine Hillary Clinton on Libyan war[W:292]

Something tells me that the more you dig at Hill's past, the more instances of situations and her damaging decisions are going to come to light.
If you care to her them and acknowledge or not, well, that's another matter entirely, isn't it?

Its already amusing watching the dance of the liberal in this thread.
 
Its like Hillary, Obama, and the rest of the lefty goon squad opened up pandoras box.

I love the lefty replies here up till now-declaring the thread over, etc. :lol:

At the the time of the Benghazi details coming out and the socialist propaganda squad was "old news", I tried to remind them that "news" is cyclical, that just as they liked to rehash the errors and omissions of the Bush administration, there would come a day when the errors and omissions would come back to haunt them.

Now, in the light of these less than heroic events of a president, the comments, actions, errors and omissions of this administration add up to a man less than committed to the defense of the country. A man who has not only played games with reality over Benghazi, but played nice with Arab Spring before he realized, oops, there might be some of those mean guys who aren't Islam.....

And with that at a backdrop, as we have demonstrated, a war time president who is losing ground to the enemy, more concerned about offending Islamic sensitivities than salvaging what's left of Syria and Iraq. In contrast, we have the King of Jordan launching sorties at the enemy, and the same Obama defense attacks him for A) risking his life after he safely returned, B) not being a threat, C) having old planes and D) not being behind the Obama "they're not Muslims camp" but rather the "let's kill the mother****ers and be done with it camp".

With nothing to stand on, attacking and anything and everything even that simply in contrast to indecisiveness or incompetence looks like legs. But they manged to get one thing right, the thread is over, has been since post #1 as no one has disputed anything in the original OP other than the once swaggering "we won, you lost" is so ****ing desperate they have to keep a thread alive with the same lame bull**** that failed to work when it was "old news".

Benghazi should never be over, it is a Pearl Harbor, an ambassador and two marines were slaughtered and their killers remain unavenged...they walk free teaching others to kill Americans because of a rookie's ego, lies and cowardice. Say what you like about Reagan or either Bush, but no one would have ****ing thought of trying **** like that on their watch.

T
 
Last edited:
Benghazi should never be over, it is a Pearl Harbor, an ambassador and two marines were slaughtered and their killers remain unavenged...they walk free teaching others to kill Americans because of a rookie's ego, lies and cowardice. Say what you like about Reagan or either Bush, but no one would have ****ing thought of trying **** like that on their watch.

T

370 Marines died when Islamic militants blew up a barracks in Beirut, and Reagan responded by invading Grenada.
 
Its already amusing watching the dance of the liberal in this thread.

Hillary has a long and, well, let's say 'colorful', past, filled with many rather questionable things that really don't do her any favors for a presidential run, many of which speak to character and values, some would say the most important aspects and attributes of a president and leader.

Just that so many want to dismiss those as long ago in the past, but there are some aspects to people's character don't really change even over time, and besides that, it goes to pattern, and a most disturbing and recurring pattern it turns out to be.

The most ardent of the ideologically indoctrinated just run around in circles with their fingers in their ears shouting "La La La!" at the top of their lungs. As if this somehow altered the facts or the ameliorated them.
 
370 Marines died when Islamic militants blew up a barracks in Beirut, and Reagan responded by invading Grenada.

Funny. I thought that Regan withdrew the ill-defended Marine barracks after that blast.
Are you sure you're not connecting 2 instances in history that have nothing to do with each other?
 
The article states Hillary lied to Obama too. Pretty damning if true.

Two peas in the same pod, if you ask me. Just have to ask Steve Croft how much 'love' there is between these two. After all, he held their 'love fest' interview.

Journalistic integrity my ass.
 
At the the time of the Benghazi details coming out and the socialist propaganda squad was "old news", I tried to remind them that "news" is cyclical, that just as they liked to rehash the errors and omissions of the Bush administration, there would come a day when the errors and omissions would come back to haunt them.

Now, in the light of these less than heroic events of a president, the comments, actions, errors and omissions of this administration add up to a man less than committed to the defense of the country. A man who has not only played games with reality over Benghazi, but played nice with Arab Spring before he realized, oops, there might be some of those mean guys who aren't Islam.....

And with that at a backdrop, as we have demonstrated, a war time president who is losing ground to the enemy, more concerned about offending Islamic sensitivities than salvaging what's left of Syria and Iraq. In contrast, we have the King of Jordan launching sorties at the enemy, and the same Obama defense attacks him for A) risking his life after he safely returned, B) not being a threat, C) having old planes and D) not being behind the Obama "they're not Muslims camp" but rather the "let's kill the mother****ers and be done with it camp".

With nothing to stand on, attacking and anything and everything even that simply in contrast to indecisiveness or incompetence looks like legs. But they manged to get one thing right, the thread is over, has been since post #1 as no one has disputed anything in the original OP other than the once swaggering "we won, you lost" is so ****ing desperate they have to keep a thread alive with the same lame bull**** that failed to work when it was "old news".

Benghazi should never be over, it is a Pearl Harbor, an ambassador and two marines were slaughtered and their killers remain unavenged...they walk free teaching others to kill Americans because of a rookie's ego, lies and cowardice. Say what you like about Reagan or either Bush, but no one would have ****ing thought of trying **** like that on their watch.

T

Damn straight, its but the latest in the string of lies and incompetence, which sets a fine stage for the dance of the liberal.
Nothing is over, they dont seem to get it.
 
Funny. I thought that Regan withdrew the ill-defended Marine barracks after that blast.
Are you sure you're not connecting 2 instances in history that have nothing to do with each other?

He also did that, yes.
 
Hillary has a long and, well, let's say 'colorful', past, filled with many rather questionable things that really don't do her any favors for a presidential run, many of which speak to character and values, some would say the most important aspects and attributes of a president and leader.

Just that so many want to dismiss those as long ago in the past, but there are some aspects to people's character don't really change even over time, and besides that, it goes to pattern, and a most disturbing and recurring pattern it turns out to be.

The most ardent of the ideologically indoctrinated just run around in circles with their fingers in their ears shouting "La La La!" at the top of their lungs. As if this somehow altered the facts or the ameliorated them.

The response is almost child like, and certainly not substantive. Its really just straight out of the lefty playbook.
 
The article states Hillary lied to Obama too. Pretty damning if true.

You are literally beating a dead horse. Not only does this show your clear hypocrisy, but total disregard for the truth of events. You would rather have a committee formed on partisan terms, backed by partisan groups, for partisan purposes, than have an actual investigation. Yet you say you want to know the "truth". But as I expected it all wraps back to that big bad Obama. :roll:
 
You are literally beating a dead horse. Not only does this show your clear hypocrisy, but total disregard for the truth of events. You would rather have a committee formed on partisan terms, backed by partisan groups, for partisan purposes, than have an actual investigation. Yet you say you want to know the "truth". But as I expected it all wraps back to that big bad Obama. :roll:

I'd think you'd want to know if a potential democrat party presidential candidate lied to get the nation into a war, a war in which her later actions resulted in the deaths of 4 Americans-lies which she later lied about.

But apparently wanting to get to the truth of the matter makes me partisan. Keep on dancing.
 
I'd think you'd want to know if a potential democrat party presidential candidate lied to get the nation into a war
So now we are categorizing this as a "war?
**** we have been in 25+ wars since 2000 then Timeline of United States military operations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

, a war in which her later actions resulted in the deaths of 4 Americans-lies which she later lied about.
Wait a sec. From post #8, you posted, this has "no association with the official investigation of the Americans including the Presidents personal representative-killed on 9/11 by islamic terrorists"? Whats going on here?

But apparently wanting to get to the truth of the matter makes me partisan. Keep on dancing.
you know damn right you dont care about the truth... You know that you are all about making cheap political points to make your GOP boys look all fine and dandy while blaming everyhing on Obama and Hilary.... As I stated earlier, "You would rather have a committee formed on partisan terms, backed by partisan groups, for partisan purposes, than have an actual investigation. Yet you say you want to know the "truth". But as I expected it all wraps back to that big bad Obama. ".
 
So now we are categorizing this as a "war?
**** we have been in 25+ wars since 2000 then Timeline of United States military operations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wait a sec. From post #8, you posted, this has "no association with the official investigation of the Americans including the Presidents personal representative-killed on 9/11 by islamic terrorists"? Whats going on here?


you know damn right you dont care about the truth... You know that you are all about making cheap political points to make your GOP boys look all fine and dandy while blaming everyhing on Obama and Hilary.... As I stated earlier, "You would rather have a committee formed on partisan terms, backed by partisan groups, for partisan purposes, than have an actual investigation. Yet you say you want to know the "truth". But as I expected it all wraps back to that big bad Obama. ".

Last I checked this hasn't been investigated. Congress will appoint (as they see fit) an appropriate committee. You will shriek regardless.
 
Last I checked this hasn't been investigated. Congress will appoint (as they see fit) an appropriate committee. You will shriek regardless.

I would? :lamo
So you think the committee now is adequate to find the truth? :lamo Yup you clearly have no agenda :lamo
 

The committee that is "investigating" this, you think its adequate to find the "truth" even the past performance of it, and the group pressuring the head of the committee? You dont see any problem with this?
 
The response is almost child like, and certainly not substantive. Its really just straight out of the lefty playbook.

Not even that...

Childish taunts and "what about Reagan?"

Reagan failed to kill Osama bin Laden, and killed marines with his own hands while sending troops to their peril in Grenada......

and his son is gay!


FFS, Reagan? HE'S DEAD! He's been dead years! But it's his fault....ironically still he is fighting a better war against terrorism than Obama....mention his name and extreme Islam ****s on its own Q'ran. At least he called terrorists terrorists and didn't blame **** on the crusades. He never, like Hillary manufactured a story about being shot at by snipers....Mrs Clinton! HE DIDN'T HAVE TO...he was shot!

Well let's put that sucker to bed once and for all...it's that elitist snob Kennedy's fault! That's right. he failed to kill Osama when the **** was still in the womb like a president should.

So put it to bed, it's a dead guy's fault....

You know why America is failing? 47% of the country is made up of Grubers who worry about who to blame, another 4% say they are "leaders" of that 47% and wage war against the "rich" and Republicans. Wait though, next week we send in the women's hockey team now that you have defeated yourselves
 
Not even that...

Childish taunts and "what about Reagan?"

Reagan failed to kill Osama bin Laden, and killed marines with his own hands while sending troops to their peril in Grenada......

and his son is gay!


FFS, Reagan? HE'S DEAD! He's been dead years! But it's his fault....ironically still he is fighting a better war against terrorism than Obama....mention his name and extreme Islam ****s on its own Q'ran. At least he called terrorists terrorists and didn't blame **** on the crusades. He never, like Hillary manufactured a story about being shot at by snipers....Mrs Clinton! HE DIDN'T HAVE TO...he was shot!

Well let's put that sucker to bed once and for all...it's that elitist snob Kennedy's fault! That's right. he failed to kill Osama when the **** was still in the womb like a president should.

So put it to bed, it's a dead guy's fault....

You know why America is failing? 47% of the country is made up of Grubers who worry about who to blame, another 4% say they are "leaders" of that 47% and wage war against the "rich" and Republicans. Wait though, next week we send in the women's hockey team now that you have defeated yourselves

Go back and look at who brought up Reagan and in what context.
 
Not even that...

Childish taunts and "what about Reagan?"

Reagan failed to kill Osama bin Laden, and killed marines with his own hands while sending troops to their peril in Grenada......

and his son is gay!


FFS, Reagan? HE'S DEAD! He's been dead years! But it's his fault....ironically still he is fighting a better war against terrorism than Obama....mention his name and extreme Islam ****s on its own Q'ran. At least he called terrorists terrorists and didn't blame **** on the crusades. He never, like Hillary manufactured a story about being shot at by snipers....Mrs Clinton! HE DIDN'T HAVE TO...he was shot!

Well let's put that sucker to bed once and for all...it's that elitist snob Kennedy's fault! That's right. he failed to kill Osama when the **** was still in the womb like a president should.

So put it to bed, it's a dead guy's fault....

You know why America is failing? 47% of the country is made up of Grubers who worry about who to blame, another 4% say they are "leaders" of that 47% and wage war against the "rich" and Republicans. Wait though, next week we send in the women's hockey team now that you have defeated yourselves

Leftism is about feeling good about failure. It feels better to blame others, to say nobody else is better, etc. Its what gets them through the day. Maybe thats good enough for them, but not me.

I lambast conservatives for trying to play nice-they are yearning for yesteryear where both sides could play ball. Out of many, one. In the mean time the left is busy smearing, blaming, and playing the many, from one game. But that era is gone, the left destroyed it.

Fast forward 40 years and you see the end result in this forums lefties. They can't defend a thing, they dont know how. They can't intelligently discuss policy-they dont know how-but MAN can they smear and blame.
 
Back
Top Bottom