- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
DiAnna can be prickly when messed with, but she's not a liar.
I never said she was.
DiAnna can be prickly when messed with, but she's not a liar.
Why does he need to offer a disclaimer about ancient deeds of Christians before he can condemn the current actions of radical Islam? Why does anyone?
I asked that same question in a different thread just a little while ago.That is a good question. I wonder why Islam can't be discussed without bringing up other religions. I don't see criticism of Christians countered with, "yeah, the Muslims did this though."
That is a good question. I wonder why Islam can't be discussed without bringing up other religions. I don't see criticism of Christians countered with, "yeah, the Muslims did this though."
I really like the little King. He makes a very intelligent and educated impression.
If you go around picking fights sooner or later someone is going to kick your ass. ISIS is a bunch of retards.
I never said she was.
I really like the little King. He makes a very intelligent and educated impression.
BULL****!
Obama campaigned on some crap about how terrorism had been defeated, he could not bring himself, and still can't, t say benghazi was terrorism. He has downplayed "terror" throughout his administration and if he, the greatest liar in history cannot come reasonably close to saying "let us not judge all of Islam" instead of blathering about Christian atrocities and whatever else he was getting at. To make that point you make that point, not use that point to excuse or downplay what Americans are seeing on their TV's on a daily basis.
He was the one who has been playing to the peace prize, making nice with these ****s, but when you look at his record, America started the war on terror in ONE country, became two under Bush and is now seven countries under Obama.
Yeah, oh, yeah, he needs there to be no terrorists all right, just like he needs you to believe you can "keep you plan" or "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain".
This is not a presidency, it is a circus side show
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/01/2008-obama-on-terrorism/“When I am president, we will wage the war that has to be won, with a comprehensive strategy with five elements: getting out of Iraq and on to the right battlefield in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing the capabilities and partnerships we need to take out the terrorists and the world’s most deadly weapons; engaging the world to dry up support for terror and extremism; restoring our values; and securing a more resilient homeland.”
Barack Obama presidential primary campaign, 2008 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaAfter weeks of discourse surrounding the policy, Obama said there was "misreporting" of his comments, stating that, "I never called for an invasion of Pakistan or Afghanistan." He clarified that rather than a surge in the number of troops in Iraq, there needed to be a "diplomatic surge" and that if there were "actionable intelligence reports" showing al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, the U.S. troops as a last resort should enter and try to capture terrorists. That would happen, he added, only if "the Pakistani government was unable or unwilling" to go after the terrorists.
Bush, six months after 911. http://youtu.be/4PGmnz5Ow-oWho knows if he’s hiding in some cave or not. We haven’t heard from him in a long time. The idea of focusing on one person really indicates to me people don’t understand the scope of the mission. Terror is bigger than one person. He’s just a person who’s been marginalized. … I don’t know where he is. I really just don’t spend that much time on him, to be honest with you.
erh, yeah. You accused her of lying. If you want to say that you didn't intend to and take that back, then that would be a fine and gentlemanly thing for you to do.
erh, yeah. You accused her of lying. If you want to say that you didn't intend to and take that back, then that would be a fine and gentlemanly thing for you to do.
I really like the little King. He makes a very intelligent and educated impression.
It's beyond comprehension. To compare Medieval times to today just makes you wonder what kind of muck is rattling around in that brainpan of his.
Jordan's Muslims are certainly helping to stop ISIS. That is what this thread is about. Sometimes I wonder if people even bother to read. They are so stuck on their ideas that any news that disputes them is thrown out the window. You are wrong and Muslims are proving it daily.
That's just not true.
I expect I know more about his campaign, since I watched every debate (among the Dems, among the Repubs, and between Obama and McCain), as well as watched almost every one of Obama's campaign speeches. I'm a political junkie and I couldn't help but soak in ALL of what he was about in the campaign.
I especially love it when progressives are dismayed about his being a turncoat and not getting us out of Afghanistan right away and not being anti-war. Anyone who paid attention to his campaign would have known that he was in favor of the Afghanistan War, but against the Iraq War (while recognizing we couldn't abruptly leave Iraq at that time).
Example (Candidate Obama, 2007):
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/01/2008-obama-on-terrorism/
And in 2008:
Barack Obama presidential primary campaign, 2008 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Obama recognized, as I and most other reasonable people do, that Iraq was not part of the terrorism problem. It was always Afghanistan and Pakistan.
He pursued terrorists MUCH more than the prior administration, not being distracted by invading countries having nothing to do with 9/11, and spending a trillion dollars in the process.
Then there's this about Bin Laden:
Bush, six months after 911. http://youtu.be/4PGmnz5Ow-o
Republicans are big on trying to rewrite history.
Actually, Jordan ignored ISIS training camps in Jordan when the US was training them. But hey.. nothing like creating your own new enemy. Typical American policy.
Starts bombing ISIS in Syria, after the burning alive of a Jordanian pilot, and states "This is just the beginning....."
Jordan unleashes wrath on ISIS: 'This is just the beginning' - CNN.com
Actually, Jordan ignored ISIS training camps in Jordan when the US was training them. But hey.. nothing like creating your own new enemy. Typical American policy.
It's beyond comprehension. To compare Medieval times to today just makes you wonder what kind of muck is rattling around in that brainpan of his.
Bulll****! Obama played two usual, "but...but...they did it tooooo!"
Whatever.
NEVER believe ANYTHING from a major news source...especially about military matters.
What kind of air strikes? How many planes were involved? What types of planes were involved? What targets did they hit? How heavily defended were they? How much ordinance was dropped? How much of it actually hit the target?
This could be anything from a large scale strike on military targets to a couple of older fighter/bombers dropping a few bombs on a lightly defended house.
And remember, most news people are incredibly ignorant about military equipment and tactics. Always get confirmation from other sources before you believe ANY details they give out.
Reports I have seen say 20 F-16's were used, striking the capital of ISIS, raqqa.
Remember, this is an arab military Im not expecting to get all of the details, why do they need to be provided?
Meanwhile, Obama justifies for ISIS...
Obama at Prayer Event: Christians did terrible things, too | Fox News