• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Vaccine Critics Turn Defensive Over Measles [W:1210]

No, it didn't. Which is why I explained why I didn't sign up at my last security investigation.

Ummm..yes, they did. The government does not just let young men get around not signing up. They don't like to imprison young men for it because they know the draft is unpopular, but please do not kid yourself into thinking you got away with anything.
 
How come you can't produce the numbers to back your claim then? I mean, you're the expert here, you're comments are entirely relevant. There's data out there, there's statistics, there's knowledge; do you have any of it? Let's see it.

Which claim?
 
English is not your strong suit either?

Again: demonstrating you do not understand herd immunity. :doh

So once again, a deflection and an insult. I don't understand herd immunity but YOU cannot produce any evidence for your claim. Do you know what evidence is? It's the measurements and statistics that back a claim. Where are yours?
 
It wiped out like a third to a half of the population of Europe. Is.... is that not a sufficiently bad outcome for you!?

"They didn't have vaccines and look, only an ENORMOUS NUMBER OF PEOPLE DIED!" This is an argument against vaccines!? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here!

:lol:

I thought you were!

Hey, I understand that. We want to protect people if we can but I care about my kids first. Not yours, if you have them... mine. At the same time I truly believe in survival of the fittest. I come from a long lineage of that. Vikings. Family line survived the Plague. First to arrive on the Mayflower. Revolutionary War veterans. Some of the first to cross the Oregon Trail. Etc. Etc.
 
Ummm..yes, they did. The government does not just let young men get around not signing up. They don't like to imprison young men for it because they know the draft is unpopular, but please do not kid yourself into thinking you got away with anything.

Uhm, no, they didn't. I am not on the selective service list. That's a fact. :shrug:

It's such a fact that I have a conversation with an investigator about it every 5 years.
 
It wiped out like a third to a half of the population of Europe. Is.... is that not a sufficiently bad outcome for you!?

"They didn't have vaccines and look, only an ENORMOUS NUMBER OF PEOPLE DIED!" This is an argument against vaccines!? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here!

When did that occur?
 
Which claim?

Herd immunity inoculation levels. We have places stretching from 80% vaccination rates to greater than 98%. You keep talking about how everyone has to be inoculated to maintain herd immunity. Well we have plenty of places with various demographics, so it seems that those numbers should be out there, yes? What are they? What the measles rate in CO compared to states with higher vaccination rates? How many of those kids die or suffer disabilities?

Where are your numbers?
 
Uhm, no, they didn't. I am not on the selective service list. That's a fact. :shrug:

It's such a fact that I have a conversation an investigator about it every 5 years.

So what, the government is bugging you about it?
 
So what, the government is bugging you about it?

No, I disclose that I didn't sign up at my security re-investigations. Happens every 5 years.


we're digressing....
 
When did what occur? The plague? The worst was the 14th century.

Yes. When did it occur?

edit: didn't read your whole reply.

So, was there a treatment for it in the 14th century? Is there a treatment for it now?

Is there a vaccine for it?
 
Last edited:
No, I disclose that I didn't sign up at my security re-investigations. Happens every 5 years.


we're digressing....

Oh, I was just interested. Seems kind of a weird thing to bring up is all.
 
I knew you'd say that. also your opinion.

I cannot imagine anything more terrible, more painful, than the loss of a child, the suffering of a child. I think it's probably the worst thing in life that people go thru.

You have no idea how I feel about my family. My 19 yr old niece was diagnosed with cancer 1.5 yrs ago, you certainly cant tell me how I felt about it.

So we will continue to disagree.

Well, I knew that you would know that I would say that...

I certainly am not going to tell you how you feel and your feelings are assuredly very strong but I can say with 100% confidence (except for some crazy people) that no parent in the world feels as strongly for any other family member as they do for their own child and it does not take a parent to understand that either. I am sure you care more about your niece than you do some 2nd or 3rd cousin... right? You care more about your niece than your horse... right? It is just like people that don't get married and say that it doesn't matter to actually sign the papers, etc. because their relationship is exactly like a marriage. I have never known one person that, after they did get married, and even some after twenty years or more, that they still felt that way... that their non-marriage relationship was like, or as strong and binding, as their married one. It is a matter of degrees...
 
Oh, I was just interested. Seems kind of a weird thing to bring up is all.

It was an answer to a claim that the govt could send you off to war at will.
 
Herd immunity inoculation levels. We have places stretching from 80% vaccination rates to greater than 98%. You keep talking about how everyone has to be inoculated to maintain herd immunity. Well we have plenty of places with various demographics, so it seems that those numbers should be out there, yes? What are they? What the measles rate in CO compared to states with higher vaccination rates? How many of those kids die or suffer disabilities?

Where are your numbers?

Why are these numbers important? The data is quite clear, more vaccinations = fewer infections, complications, and deaths.
I think you're exaggerating things. Nobody is saying 100% of the population must be vaccinated. In fact, we often point out that many people can't be vaccinated.

Higher is better. Period.
 
Yes. When did it occur?

I don't know, maybe in the timeframe I put in the post you quoted?

It was prevalent for a long time, but in that period it wiped out a large portion of Europe.
 
I'ts not true...it's your speculation. And we did have the draft and it was perfectly legal. It has not been declared 'illegal' or unConstitutional.

Neither was the 1896 Plessy v Ferguson SCOTUS Decision which WAS illegal and unconstitutional and was overturned 60 years later with the Brown V Board Decision of 1954.

The draft violates the 5th Amendment depriving citizens of "life, liberty, or property without due process of law."
 
It was an answer to a claim that the govt could send you off to war at will.

I know what happened in the thread. It just seems weird to bring that up every five years. Anyway, I have decided this is far too personal, so I will just allow myself to stay curious.
 
I don't know, maybe in the timeframe I put in the post you quoted?

It was prevalent for a long time, but in that period it wiped out a large portion of Europe.

Yes, in the 14th century it did. In the modern age it would not. Why? Because we now know how to treat it. IS there a vaccine for bubonic plague?
 
I know what happened in the thread. It just seems weird to bring that up every five years. Anyway, I have decided this is far too personal, so I will just allow myself to stay curious.

In that type of investigation you disclose anything out of the ordinary. :shrug:
 
Why are these numbers important? The data is quite clear, more vaccinations = fewer infections, complications, and deaths.
I think you're exaggerating things. Nobody is saying 100% of the population must be vaccinated. In fact, we often point out that many people can't be vaccinated.

Higher is better. Period.

The numbers are important because of exactly what you just said "Nobody is saying 100% of the population must be vaccinated". So to maintain herd immunity, we need something between 0 and 100, what is it? Because people want to sit around and freak out about some folk who don't inoculate their kids, but has that aggregated to a level where it makes a true difference? There are places like Colorado that have vaccination levels for the Measles around 80%, has that reduction caused a statistically significant increase in cases? In deaths? In long term disabilities?

People should vaccinate their kids, true. But we're setting ourselves up on a witchhunt against those who choose not to. But is the witch hunt justified? That's why the numbers are important.

I fear that on both sides of this issue, people have merely freaked out and are not thinking logically. But how can we condemn people less there is legitimate reason?
 
Yes. When did it occur?

edit: didn't read your whole reply.

So, was there a treatment for it in the 14th century? Is there a treatment for it now?

Is there a vaccine for it?

There is a treatment now, yes. (antibiotics) There is no vaccine. (because the plague is not a virus)
 
The numbers are important because of exactly what you just said "Nobody is saying 100% of the population must be vaccinated". So to maintain herd immunity, we need something between 0 and 100, what is it? Because people want to sit around and freak out about some folk who don't inoculate their kids, but has that aggregated to a level where it makes a true difference? There are places like Colorado that have vaccination levels for the Measles around 80%, has that reduction caused a statistically significant increase in cases? In deaths? In long term disabilities?

People should vaccinate their kids, true. But we're setting ourselves up on a witchhunt against those who choose not to. But is the witch hunt justified? That's why the numbers are important.

I fear that on both sides of this issue, people have merely freaked out and are not thinking logically. But how can we condemn people less there is legitimate reason?

A "witch hunt" against people who put their children, and the children of others, at greater risk based on incorrect beliefs, yes. If by "witch hunt" you mean "saying mean things about them on a message board."

Personally, I'd say calling this a "witch hunt" is freaking out.
 
In that type of investigation you disclose anything out of the ordinary. :shrug:

I wonder how often it really happens. I know that many of my buddies didn't sign up for the draft either, so I have to wonder how many young men really do.
 
There is a treatment now, yes. (antibiotics) There is no vaccine. (because the plague is not a virus)

Well, then the Bubonic Plague (of earlier centuries) is hardly an example of what could happen if we don't get vaccinated against the Measles, now, is it?
 
Back
Top Bottom