“If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.”
- Alexander Hamilton. Spiritual father of #NeverTrump
your opinion is no better than theirs (vice versa) and calling thier opinion a lie just further demonstrates how dishonest your posts are
you are welcome to that OPINION of course but thats all it will ever be. The difference is YOU want to infringe on thier rights and force your opinions on them while they respect your rights and leave you free to your choices.
the only fact about your post is that YOU calling it a lie, as if that's a fact, IS the lie. Please keep repeating this dishonesty because it further exposes the how mentally inane your "claims" are and the pure dishonest hypocrisy of your posts..
I have made no such assumption.You assume that the right to life supersedes all other rights.
If you want to sacrifice your own life for a cause, its yours to sacrifice. If you want to kill someone else for your personal gain, that's not in the same moral ballpark. That should be intuitively obvious to anyone, but moral compasses sometimes need a tune-up, I guess.They place freedom, personal causes, loved ones, principles, etc above life frequently.
No. Preventing any one human from killing another human in aggression does not infringe upon their rights to life, liberty, or property. This does not change regardless of who the potential killer is nor who the intended victim is. You may as well be opining that laws against you walking outside right now and shooting someone infringe upon your right to liberty, somehow. They don't.So to protect the (non-existent) rights of the unborn against the mother's will, the govt must infringe on her rights to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness
As usual, you have no counterpoint for anything.
You state something about how life is less important than liberty to some people, I correctly point out that people make this call for themselves, not for others.
You state something about how not being allowed to kill another human being in aggression "infringes" upon someone's rights; I correctly point out that laws against homicide do not infringe upon your rights but are how the government protects our rights in the first place.
banning abortion would in fact infringe on legal and human rights
law, rights, facts and many court cases prove this . . . .please do tell us . . what do you have that supports your failed and destroyed claim again besides "nu-huh"
your post fails and facts win again
Oh look, more garbage posting that contains no counterpoint whatsoever, only childish stuff about "owning."
I find that "pwn" works better if you want to convey just pure ridiculousness, which is obviously what you were going for.
your post fails and facts win again
if you disagree PLEASE present the facts that prove the law, rights and many court cases wrong and that shows that banning abortion does not infringe on woman's current legal and human rights, thanks
I bet you dodge it AGAIN
You dont have anything to do so with.
You can spout the same thing over and over again but it doesnt make it true. I explained it clearly that they cannot be treated equally under the Constitution. I cant open your brain and make you understand it (even tho you wouldnt like it. heh, not that I care)
Bad reason. It was a reason based on (okay, I'll pander for votes now that I think I need to)
Plus, add to the fact that two female republican GOP members were for or pro HR 1797 in June of 2013, then most recently reversed their support for this most recent bill.
I'm glad it took two (at least) GOP female members to deride this bill, I just wonder when the GOP will pinch themselves and wake up to reality and stop alienating Latino, Hispanic, minority and poor voters.
But remember, the GOP is largely filled with some hypocrites, so we might see more reversals for their policies.
Last edited by AJiveMan; 01-28-15 at 03:31 PM.