• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

George Soros funds Ferguson protests to the tune of $33M?? Is this for real?

eohrnberger

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
65,133
Reaction score
49,256
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Been scratchin' my head thinking of the most appropriate forum for this. Hope this is the right one.
George Soros funds Ferguson protests, hopes to spur civil action
Liberal billionaire gave at least $33 million in one year to groups that emboldened activists
By Kelly Riddell - The Washington Times - Wednesday, January 14, 2015

There’s a solitary man at the financial center of the Ferguson protest movement. No, it’s not victim Michael Brown or Officer Darren Wilson. It’s not even the Rev. Al Sharpton, despite his ubiquitous campaign on TV and the streets.

Rather, it’s liberal billionaire George Soros, who has built a business empire that dominates across the ocean in Europe while forging a political machine powered by nonprofit foundations that impacts American politics and policy, not unlike what he did with MoveOn.org.
Mr. Soros spurred the Ferguson protest movement through years of funding and mobilizing groups across the U.S., according to interviews with key players and financial records reviewed by The Washington Times.

In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations.

The financial tether from Mr. Soros to the activist groups gave rise to a combustible protest movement that transformed a one-day criminal event in Missouri into a 24-hour-a-day national cause celebre.

“Our DNA includes a belief that having people participate in government is indispensable to living in a more just, inclusive, democratic society,” said Kenneth Zimmerman, director of Mr. SorosOpen Society Foundations’ U.S. programs, in an interview with The Washington Times. “Helping groups combine policy, research [and] data collection with community organizing feels very much the way our society becomes more accountable.”

No strings attached

Mr. Zimmerman said OSF has been giving to these types of groups since its inception in the early ‘90s, and that, although groups involved in the protests have been recipients of Mr. Soros‘ grants, they were in no way directed to protest at the behest of Open Society.

“The incidents, whether in Staten Island, Cleveland or Ferguson, were spontaneous protests — we don’t have the ability to control or dictate what others say or choose to say,” Mr. Zimmerman said. “But these circumstances focused people’s attention — and it became increasingly evident to the social justice groups involved that what a particular incident like Ferguson represents is a lack of accountability and a lack of democratic participation.”
George Soros funds Ferguson protests, hopes to spur civil action

Now during the Ferguson protests, demonstrations, and later the riots, I recall a number of times from a number of reporting sources that there were many 'out of towners', non-local people participating in the Ferguson protests, demonstrations, and later the riots. Seems that if this story is true (I mean, isn't the Washington Times supposed to be a reasonable source?), this would certainly explain why and how these non-local protestors, demonstrators, and rioters could afford to camp out in Ferguson for months on end, right?

So first, I'm looking I anyone has come across a confirming source other than a quoting and referring of the Washington Times piece.

Second, since Soros so heavily funded these non-local protestors, demonstrators, and rioters, is he legally liable for the injuries and damages in some form? After all, his spending his money to pay for the mob that was there pretty much caused the fires and looting, right? (Well, OK, maybe not).

Lastly, what do you think? If Soros is not legally liable, what about the possibly questionable morality of causing, directly or indirectly, the injuries, damages, fires, and police overtime?
 
Been scratchin' my head thinking of the most appropriate forum for this. Hope this is the right one.
George Soros funds Ferguson protests, hopes to spur civil action

Now during the Ferguson protests, demonstrations, and later the riots, I recall a number of times from a number of reporting sources that there were many 'out of towners', non-local people participating in the Ferguson protests, demonstrations, and later the riots. Seems that if this story is true (I mean, isn't the Washington Times supposed to be a reasonable source?), this would certainly explain why and how these non-local protestors, demonstrators, and rioters could afford to camp out in Ferguson for months on end, right?

So first, I'm looking I anyone has come across a confirming source other than a quoting and referring of the Washington Times piece.

Second, since Soros so heavily funded these non-local protestors, demonstrators, and rioters, is he legally liable for the injuries and damages in some form? After all, his spending his money to pay for the mob that was there pretty much caused the fires and looting, right? (Well, OK, maybe not).

Lastly, what do you think? If Soros is not legally liable, what about the possibly questionable morality of causing, directly or indirectly, the injuries, damages, fires, and police overtime?

I think you should consider the source... The Moony Times.
 
Your thread title...

George Soros funds Ferguson protests to the tune of $33M?? Is this for real?​

And your source...

In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations.​

Your source is a hack site. Not to mention your hack site doesn't support your thread title. Your source says he gave $33 million to groups and then states that some of those groups then might have supported the protests in Ferguson. That's not exactly giving $33 million to Ferguson.

Then your source goes on a long rant and finally mentions one organization and then says that it is "partly" funded by George Soros.

What a stretch these guys are making.
 
Last edited:
Your thread title...

George Soros funds Ferguson protests to the tune of $33M?? Is this for real?​

And your source...

In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations.​

Your source is a hack site. Not to mention your hack site doesn't support your thread title. Your source says he gave $33 million to groups and then states that some of those groups then might have supported the protests in Ferguson. That's not exactly giving $33 million to Ferguson.

So giving to already established groups doesn't count.... I guess it only counts if NEW groups were involved but since it's existing groups, psssh... doesn't count, and besides they "might have" supported the protests, so plausible deniability. Sweet deal.
 
Sun Myung Moon owned the WTimes ( he's now dead). I find much of it of questionable worth.. I find the claims here of dubious value..
when I try to access the WTimes my IE browser shuts down with "malicious add ons detected" - so there is that :roll:
 
So giving to already established groups doesn't count.... I guess it only counts if NEW groups were involved but since it's existing groups, psssh... doesn't count, and besides they "might have" supported the protests, so plausible deniability. Sweet deal.

Read his source. Tell me the names of the orgs they supposed did this and then Soros' ties to that organization.
 
Read his source. Tell me what they say about what organizations and what they did.

I did read it... I'm not denying what they say.... I'm simply making an observation.
 
Been scratchin' my head thinking of the most appropriate forum for this. Hope this is the right one.
George Soros funds Ferguson protests, hopes to spur civil action

Now during the Ferguson protests, demonstrations, and later the riots, I recall a number of times from a number of reporting sources that there were many 'out of towners', non-local people participating in the Ferguson protests, demonstrations, and later the riots. Seems that if this story is true (I mean, isn't the Washington Times supposed to be a reasonable source?), this would certainly explain why and how these non-local protestors, demonstrators, and rioters could afford to camp out in Ferguson for months on end, right?

So first, I'm looking I anyone has come across a confirming source other than a quoting and referring of the Washington Times piece.

Second, since Soros so heavily funded these non-local protestors, demonstrators, and rioters, is he legally liable for the injuries and damages in some form? After all, his spending his money to pay for the mob that was there pretty much caused the fires and looting, right? (Well, OK, maybe not).

Lastly, what do you think? If Soros is not legally liable, what about the possibly questionable morality of causing, directly or indirectly, the injuries, damages, fires, and police overtime?

Whatever the amount was which helped support the idiots, I hope that a large portion of it gets eaten up defending their idiocy.

Bloomington authorities file charges against Black Lives Matter MOA protesters
[...]

A press release distributed by the city of Bloomington says that 10 protesters "have been formally charged by the Bloomington City Attorney's Office with crimes related to the demonstration to include Unlawful Assembly, Public Nuisance and Disorderly Conduct." A total of 25 were arrested, and the release doesn't rule out that more charges could be forthcoming.

[...]
Authorities file charges against Black Lives Matter protesters - KMSP-TV
 
all the soros apologetics/demonizations aside... the statement from the link kinda peaked my interest.

“The incidents, whether in Staten Island, Cleveland or Ferguson, were spontaneous protests — we don’t have the ability to control or dictate what others say or choose to say,” Mr. Zimmerman said. “But these circumstances focused people’s attention — and it became increasingly evident to the social justice groups involved that what a particular incident like Ferguson represents is a lack of accountability and a lack of democratic participation.”


how in the sam hell does Ferguson represent a"lack of democratic participation"?... lack of accountability i get, but lack of democratic participation?... sounds like a bit of bull**** wrapped in a bow for use as a soundbite to me.


anyways, it doesn't really sound like Soros funded the protests.. it sounds like Soros-funded groups grabbed hold of the protests and joined their side in some capacity.
not sure if that makes it all better or worse.. but whatever... .Soros is a Soros, the yin to the Koch yang
 
I think you should consider the source... The Moony Times.

Well, yeah, Pete. I did have doubts about the source, and I think I expressed that, I thought, in my post, looking for a confirming source not connected to, as you put it, The Moony Times. (Kinda cute you know?)

But then you have other sites claiming all kinds of things, Discover the Networks for example, which also may or may not be true. Some of the claims do have connections to other, more reasonable news sites. That with some of the interview and other public statments that Soros has made, kinda fall in line with that. So it makes you wonder.
 
Sun Myung Moon owned the WTimes ( he's now dead). I find much of it of questionable worth.. I find the claims here of dubious value..
when I try to access the WTimes my IE browser shuts down with "malicious add ons detected" - so there is that :roll:

Well, Internet Exploder, what a surprise (*sarcasm*). I'd recommend Firefox or Chrome, far more secure and faster, from what I've been told.
 
I did read it... I'm not denying what they say.... I'm simply making an observation.

The OP was clearly trying to imply that $33 million went directly from Soros' pocket to Ferguson, which is kind of also implying that he was involved at a very direct level there. At the VERY least, he was one of many people who gave some money to already established organizations that one MAY, kind of sorta, possibly have helped out at the protests. Maybe. But we'll never know by the shoddy writing in that "news" story presented as fact with almost no sourcing.
 
Whatever the amount was which helped support the idiots, I hope that a large portion of it gets eaten up defending their idiocy.

Bloomington authorities file charges against Black Lives Matter MOA protesters
[...]

A press release distributed by the city of Bloomington says that 10 protesters "have been formally charged by the Bloomington City Attorney's Office with crimes related to the demonstration to include Unlawful Assembly, Public Nuisance and Disorderly Conduct." A total of 25 were arrested, and the release doesn't rule out that more charges could be forthcoming.

[...]
Authorities file charges against Black Lives Matter protesters - KMSP-TV

I think that's just fine and quite right. They did the deed, and they need to be held accountable for it. Had no damages been done, I doubt that there'd be any charges files against them, or even if charges, they'd be very minor ones, IMHO. But frankly, the rioting and looting, that lawlessness, needs to be strongly discouraged. Legal protesting and demonstrations, fine. Damages and looting, not fine.
 
Been scratchin' my head thinking of the most appropriate forum for this. Hope this is the right one.
George Soros funds Ferguson protests, hopes to spur civil action

Now during the Ferguson protests, demonstrations, and later the riots, I recall a number of times from a number of reporting sources that there were many 'out of towners', non-local people participating in the Ferguson protests, demonstrations, and later the riots. Seems that if this story is true (I mean, isn't the Washington Times supposed to be a reasonable source?), this would certainly explain why and how these non-local protestors, demonstrators, and rioters could afford to camp out in Ferguson for months on end, right?

So first, I'm looking I anyone has come across a confirming source other than a quoting and referring of the Washington Times piece.

Second, since Soros so heavily funded these non-local protestors, demonstrators, and rioters, is he legally liable for the injuries and damages in some form? After all, his spending his money to pay for the mob that was there pretty much caused the fires and looting, right? (Well, OK, maybe not).

Lastly, what do you think? If Soros is not legally liable, what about the possibly questionable morality of causing, directly or indirectly, the injuries, damages, fires, and police overtime?

From a man who says it was the happiest time in his life to send fellow jews to the ovens and steal their thing, I am not shocked in the least, enjoy being raped by Satan when you die Soros.
 
The OP was clearly trying to imply that $33 million went directly from Soros' pocket to Ferguson, which is kind of also implying that he was involved at a very direct level there. At the VERY least, he was one of many people who gave some money to already established organizations that one MAY, kind of sorta, possibly have helped out at the protests. Maybe. But we'll never know by the shoddy writing in that "news" story presented as fact with almost no sourcing.

And lets face it, just because Soros is rich doesn't mean he's stupid. I doubt he'd give money directly to any group - there will always be inbetweens just in case the money can be directly traced back to him. And yes, the state of journalism in this country has been scraping the bottom for quite a while - it's like that all over. On that sad fact we can agree.
 
The OP was clearly trying to imply that $33 million went directly from Soros' pocket to Ferguson, which is kind of also implying that he was involved at a very direct level there. At the VERY least, he was one of many people who gave some money to already established organizations that one MAY, kind of sorta, possibly have helped out at the protests. Maybe. But we'll never know by the shoddy writing in that "news" story presented as fact with almost no sourcing.

Well, I dispute that I presented that article as any sort of fact (the writer of the article, maybe, probably).

My doubts about it were such that I was asking for and looking for, some sort of confirmation, or exactly what's happening in here, which a critical review of it. And isn't that kinda the purpose of this forum? To review and discuss these things and other things with a wider audience, with a greater critical eye, better than driving your family up a wall with these sorts of discussions?
 
From a man who says it was the happiest time in his life to send fellow jews to the ovens and steal their thing, I am not shocked in the least, enjoy being raped by Satan when you die Soros.

A Glenn Beck fan I see.:thumbdown
 
So giving to already established groups doesn't count.... I guess it only counts if NEW groups were involved but since it's existing groups, psssh... doesn't count, and besides they "might have" supported the protests, so plausible deniability. Sweet deal.

Did you notice how vague the article was on specific dates?

In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year

Doesn't say which year though, but if you read far enough, you'll find these:

Colorlines is an online news site that focuses on race issues and is published by Race Forward, a group that received $200,000 from Mr. Soros’s foundation in 2011.


The group received $150,000 from Mr. Soros in 2011.

Mr. Wright was Mr. Obama’s pastor in Chicago before some of his racially charged sermons, including the phrase “God damn America,” forced Mr. Obama to distance himself. SDPC received $250,000 from Mr. Soros in 2011.


That's right, Soros gave $33M to the Ferguson protests, in 2011. I assume this is the year they meant, as no other year is mentioned nearly as often.
 
Well, I dispute that I presented that article as any sort of fact (the writer of the article, maybe, probably).

My doubts about it were such that I was asking for and looking for, some sort of confirmation, or exactly what's happening in here, which a critical review of it. And isn't that kinda the purpose of this forum? To review and discuss these things and other things with a wider audience, with a greater critical eye, better than driving your family up a wall with these sorts of discussions?

Yeah I'm not holding your responsible for the way the article was written. That horrible crap is just the writer's fault. The only thing I can really fault you for is your misleading presentation via the thread title.
 
Yeah I'm not holding your responsible for the way the article was written. That horrible crap is just the writer's fault. The only thing I can really fault you for is your misleading presentation via the thread title.

Even in the title I was asking 'Is this for real?', so I don't know where you have a disagreement.
Could I have worded the title better? Yeah, OK. Maybe I could have. Suggestions for next time?
 
Even in the title I was asking 'Is this for real?', so I don't know where you have a disagreement.
Could I have worded the title better? Yeah, OK. Maybe I could have. Suggestions for next time?

You did alright I suppose. It's a very Drudge like title. :lol:
 
I don't know. I was asking you if it's fake. I wasn't aware of it, but you seem to be familiar with it.
I remember when Beck had his show on Fox he had all sorts of conspiracy theories about Soros. I don't remember the details, only that it was garbage.
 
Back
Top Bottom