1.) Oh I am fully aware of you M.O. cupcake.. factually this, factually that, translation this, translation that..
here's what you said exactly.
2.)First lets deal with the strawman. By invoking hyperbole, you intentionally lead the observer to assume that what you're saying is so vile that it couldn't possibly be allowed in a work place environment, thus, setting up a strawman, and knocking it down - HOWEVER, (And here's the analogy part, you paying attention yet) notwithstanding your attempt to equate (Which is another way to say analogous)
vile niggers - Jews burning - Dirty black people - "fags" unleashing plagues - and filthy Christian infidels deserving to be killed was absurd, not even remotely analogous to this situation, but you attempted to present it anyway.
I "factually" called you out on it, ONLY because you were
calling out other posters for doing the same thing, the only difference is, that most of their analogies were at least close. TRANSLATION: You did exactly the same thing that you accused others of doing.
Got it now? Was it clear enough and factually consistent with the evidence? Was I able to translate your words into context with the proper syntax associated with the English language, well enough to form a reasonable understanding of what you were saying in printed word? Assuming I did translate correctly, how on Earth can you argue that you did not present a stawman argument, or a phony analogy that was no analogy at all?? Please do try though, I as always when dealing with you, could use the laugh.
Tim-