- Joined
- Feb 7, 2012
- Messages
- 58,400
- Reaction score
- 26,453
- Location
- Mentor Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Of course they are. How could you possibly not know this?Now homosexuals are a protected class ... :lamo
Of course they are. How could you possibly not know this?Now homosexuals are a protected class ... :lamo
which is it, are there laws or policies he crossed created by the gay agenda or was it totally imaginary? you are making inconsistent arguments.
It says no where that he did it AT WORK.
No,
“Despite my respect for Chief Cochran’s service, I believe his actions and decision-making undermine his ability to effectively manage a large, diverse work force,” Mr. Reed said. “Every single employee under the fire chief’s command deserves the certainty that he or she is a valued member of the team and that fairness and respect guide employment decisions.”
In the Mayor's opinion, Cochran *might* discriminate due to his held beliefs.
So it is your stance that we should allow discrimination in the public work place and it is a form of discrimination not to?
No,
“Despite my respect for Chief Cochran’s service, I believe his actions and decision-making undermine his ability to effectively manage a large, diverse work force,” Mr. Reed said. “Every single employee under the fire chief’s command deserves the certainty that he or she is a valued member of the team and that fairness and respect guide employment decisions.”
In the Mayor's opinion, Cochran *might* discriminate due to his held beliefs.
he might coerce his employees in accepting a book due to his power to fire them ...
oh wait, he did do that!
see post 49. Cochran never discriminated against anyone but, the Mayor thought he *might given his views.
THERE WAS NO DISCRIMINATION on Cochran's part.
Now you're imagining things.
Where did Cochran discriminate?
Except he was fired for discrimination not for passing out religious ramblings.No only that the pamphets he authored were given out to WORKERS. Using his office to promote religious views to his subordinates. If that is not State sponsored religion I don't know what is.
Of course they are. How could you possibly not know this?
Except he was fired for discrimination not for passing out religious ramblings.
No only that the pamphets he authored were given out to WORKERS. Using his office to promote religious views to his subordinates. If that is not State sponsored religion I don't know what is.
By passing out a book to some employees that condemned certain of those employees as "unclean", "vulgar" and "inappropriate". That he passed them out internally(source: Atlanta Fire Chief terminated after controversial book) makes it inappropriate.
His discrimination was religious ramblings.
Hearsay
That's his Constitutional right.
Except he was fired for discrimination not for passing out religious ramblings.
There is no constitutional right to discriminate.
You still can't understand that fact that he didn't?
He handed out discriminatory books for Crist's sake. What's not to understand?
There's nothing discriminatory about it.