1.) He aint french.. he is British, born and bred.
Anjem Choudary - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2.) He is a well known radical going back decades. He in fact is accused of being the inspiration for the 7/7 bombers if I am not mistaken. The Brits have been trying to get him convicted of terror many times but have found it more than hard.... does not help that he is a lawyer of course.
3.) He has zero credibility and in no way represents Islam in any form and cant even really be called an Iman. He has been condemned many times by Islamic leaders in the UK for his words and action. Last I looked it up, he did not even have a mosque to preach from because no mosque would allow it.
Originally Posted by mbigOriginally Posted by mbig
Though that IS true 95% of the time in re Name of Religion/Islam violence.
There won't be any rebuttal to that (either), you need the STRAWMAN "never".
near identical to the Most common strawman, Pretending someone said "ALL Muslims are terrorists."
2. So you got ONE story (CAR) repeated 3 T!mes, and another 'here' about a dozen Cultists who NEVER HURT a fly!
That was comparable to what I posted/you 'responded' to?
5042 People dead of Jihad in 14 Countries in JUST the month of November 2014?
Thousands of people die EVERY Month in DOZENS of Countries in the Name of Islam.
From Mauritania to Mindinao it's a Long BLOODY line.
And not too pretty in Mumbai or Malmo either.
As to "here", of course we've stopped More than FIFTY Islamic plots from 9/11 thru 2011 Alone.
50 Terror Attacks Foiled Since 9/11
And others are just plain dead, as Ft Hood.
3. The point again is, it is NOT remotely comparable.
The Amount of Violence committed in the name of Islam, is Exponentially greater than by anyone else.
Go ahead, try Strawman-ing me with the irrelevant/Disingenuous "never" or "all" again.
Last edited by mbig; 01-08-15 at 04:00 PM.
I'm personally sick of not being able to dunk a basketball because of racism.
I would like to think that killing people because you don’t like what they draw or write is universally understood by adults as “disproportionate.” If it isn’t, however, then I’m all for strongly encouraging this “Western” view.
You are so right; the free speech that is a fundamental part of “Western” society is a tremendous source of strength, one that cannot be compromised, particularly out of fear. Appeasement is never enough.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/so...ons#.bv8LVDqv7 The idea of 'Free Speech' is still there in our imaginations but is no longer a reality.