2.) no they clearly 100% are seperate, human rights are not civil rights, thats just a fact.
some human rights line up just like some reliogus rights line up with civil/legal right but they are completely separate.
are all human rights legal rights/civil rights? no
are all human rights made civil rights/legal rights becuse they are human rights? no
theres nothign to debate, the fact is they are seperate
2.) very true and if i claimed "i want to get a man pregnant" and you ask me how, saying i want to do it, is not an answer
but your example is exactly my point . . what he wants is impossible
“I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.
A contract would not be necessary otherwise. There would just be big lists of stuff for people to remember since it was a 'given' that they'd be fulfilled.