Last edited by iguanaman; 01-07-15 at 04:21 PM.
the fact that you can't defend against your own argument shows why it is logically insane and can make anyone into anything.
you throw the word bigot around like it has an affect on a person. you preach of tolerance of others yet shown none yourself.
I am not promoting anything other than the argument that you used can be used to justify anything, and how dare someone disagree with it.
if they do then we can call them names and attempt to demean them as if it adds weight to the argument.
the fact that you would deny people the equal marriage rights shows how much hyperbole is behind that argument in general. it shows how bigoted you are.
sucks to become the thing you say you hate doesn't it.
And as long as they didnt get *more* benefits and legal protections than couples, I dont care at all if they legalize polygamy. As I mentioned, they live that way anyway. As long as they are treated "equally" then I dont care. But it's been pointed out by others that that would be difficult, if not impossible.
Hence, an illustration of human vs civil rights. People practice polygamy all the time, it's just not sanctioned by the law. It's also not prevented by law.
Last edited by iguanaman; 01-07-15 at 04:32 PM.
saying what you want is not saying how you do it. I could say i want guns to be legal everywhere that doesnt answer how i would do it
Ill ask again and i bet you dodge it again
you said "I'd rather just see government out of the mix entirely."
Im asking you how would you do that? what system would you put in place to do all the things a marriage contract does and do it without involving government?
2.) except fore the fact you have not provided the same argument lol
3.) bigot is a bigot, doesnt matter how that term affects a person
4.) this may be true but can you show where iguanaman factually hasnt shown tolerance?
5.) again it cant and you analogy failed, repeat this fallacy 10 more times it will still be false
6.) call what names? demean who