- Joined
- Jul 31, 2014
- Messages
- 4,230
- Reaction score
- 1,605
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Constitutional rights are the foundation of legal rights. I don't find any support for how the two conflicting rights can exist based on the Constitution.I'm beginning to think you're not yet a Junior in high school.
Someone in THE COMMISSION of a MURDER is not "accused". They are subject to ZERO constitutional rights when IN THE COMMISSION of a murder. I've cited the section code of federal law for you like 3 times. Either you start reading THE LAW, or learn it when you get to college.
There's a reason people can defend themselves with lethal force. There's a REASON Wilson is not EVEN indicted. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Yes. I encourage everyone to try and protect their lives. Killing other people is not the best means for protecting your own life. It's the best means for killing other people.The criminal doesn't care if he kills you, shouldn't you care about protecting yoir life?
Police have technology, numbers, strength, and experience on their side. I expect the police to be able to use these to supplement them when engaging potential criminals in place of simply shooting them.Actually, he is saying both should live, only he doesn't understand that when faced with the attack police can't run like he would. Is that the world he wants to live in? One where police run from criminals rather than one where police stop criminals?