- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
- Messages
- 16,763
- Reaction score
- 4,344
- Location
- Melbourne Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
You didnt answer his question.
Did see a question. Just an attempt to debunk my post.
You didnt answer his question.
Your suppositions are your own and I can't be responsible for them.
He is a congressman. Otherwise known as a chameleon.
Yes, that's it exactly. Good one.That's essentially your logic here.
Why do Leftists still think it's amusing to misspell words?
Did see a question. Just an attempt to debunk my post.
Yes, that's it exactly. Good one.
How does this bill support Sharia law?
You are inventing what ifs and expecting me to respond? Discuss the topic in real terms and I dont mind getting involved but otherwise it holds no interest for me.So if I'm wrong what is your logic?
It can not happen in the United States. I suspect it can't in the EU countries either.
I'm guessing what you're seeing is nothing more than the pains of integrating a different culture into European societies We've done it several times in our history. It's a long term good thing despite the growing pains.
And Geller is right. These 'hate speech' laws have been used by Muslim groups everywhere so that any criticism pf Islam or Shariah law will be defined, by them, as "Hate Speech". The accused can be tied up in courts for years defending themselves from these charges, which pretty much silences criticism of any aspect of Islam.The sharia bill calls for Islamic blasphemy laws — the criminalization of speech that offends or insults — who, exactly? Well, that is up to the enforcer, is it not? - See more at: Sharia in America: Democrats and Muslim Legislators seek to criminalize free speech | Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs
The sharia bill calls for Islamic blasphemy laws — the criminalization of speech that offends or insults — who, exactly? Well, that is up to the enforcer, is it not? - See more at: Sharia in America: Democrats and Muslim Legislators seek to criminalize free speech | Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs
The sharia bill calls for Islamic blasphemy laws — the criminalization of speech that offends or insults — who, exactly? Well, that is up to the enforcer, is it not? - See more at: Sharia in America: Democrats and Muslim Legislators seek to criminalize free speech | Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs
It does no such thing. First it deals with hate crime - not hate speech. Second it mandates and ALREADY EXISTING report with more current information.
Here is the entire text of the bill. Read it yourself - and not getting your information second hand from Pamela Geller who apparently doesn't know how to read - and then tell me again what it has to do with Sharia law.
113th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2219
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
April 8, 2014
Mr. Markey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
A BILL
To require the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to update a report on the role of telecommunications, including the Internet, in the commission of hate crimes.
1. Short title
This Act may be cited as the " Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 ".
2. Report
Section 155 of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration Organization Act (enacted as section 135 of Public Law 102–538 ; 106 Stat. 3542) is amended to read as follows:
155.
Report on the role of telecommunications in hate crimes
(a) Report required
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 , the NTIA, with the assistance of the Department of Justice, the Commission, and the United States Commission on Civil Rights, shall submit a report to the Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate on the role of telecommunications in hate crimes in accordance with subsection (b).
(b) Scope of report
The report required under subsection (a) shall—
(1) analyze information on the use of telecommunications, including the Internet, broadcast television and radio, cable television, public access television, commercial mobile services, and other electronic media, to advocate and encourage violent acts and the commission of crimes of hate, as described in the Hate Crime Statistics Act ( 28 U.S.C. 534 note);
(2) include any recommendations, consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, that the NTIA determines are appropriate and necessary to address the use of telecommunications described in paragraph (1); and
(3) update the previous report submitted under this section (as in effect before the date of enactment of the Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 )
No it doesnt. It calls on the NTIA to update a report from 1993. "To require the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to update a report on the role of telecommunications, including the Internet, in the commission of hate crimes."
Passing is not the first priority. They are doing this to find the cracks in the system.And Geller is right. These 'hate speech' laws have been used by Muslim groups everywhere so that any criticism pf Islam or Shariah law will be defined, by them, as "Hate Speech". The accused can be tied up in courts for years defending themselves from these charges, which pretty much silences criticism of any aspect of Islam.
Those pushing the law have to know this, which will make the process quite interesting. I doubt it will ever pass.
You are inventing what ifs and expecting me to respond? Discuss the topic in real terms and I dont mind getting involved but otherwise it holds no interest for me.
They don't have to be members of ISIS in order to be influenced by ISIS. How do you think ISIS is recruiting Muslim men from around the world?
Again, limiting speech. Clear 1st amendment attack.
You can scream that you wish to stay blind and deaf to attempts to bring Muslim law to the US, but give it time.
To do what?No it doesnt. It requests a study.
To do what?
No it doesnt. It requests a study.
I trust nothing 100%. But where there is smoke there is fire.For now the 4th time: "To require the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to update a report on the role of telecommunications, including the Internet, in the commission of hate crimes."
i have a feeling you havent read this bill and are giving this ****ing crazy woman 100% of your trust.
And what is the point of this study? Why bother?