2) I never said anything otherwise.
3) I don't believe there is a rule on this board that says I'm required to address everything mentioned in a post or a link when I respond. If I was making a point about animal abuse, and posted a long article that said "Cats are burned. Cats are hit with objects. Cats are shot. Cats are hung by their tails. Cats are declawed.", and someone responded by saying something about declawing and asking if that's torture, I wouldn't be ignorant enough to accuse that poster of being a psychopath, or even demanding to know why the poster didn't address the other points in the article.
I don't consider pornography to be torture. I don't owe anyone an explanation for that, nor do I owe anyone an explanation as to why that's the only thing I posted.