You do what all liberals do to divert from the fact that these weren't innocents but most high level leadership captured on the battlefield. This is a war and in war you do whatever is necessary to save American lives. I am not a terrorists, I am not at war with you or your kids therefore I would do no harm to them. If one of your kids kidnapped one of mine, threatened to kill them, and you knew where they were, you bet I would authorize whatever techniques available to find them and prosecute youMildSteel;1064132445]You have totally missed the point. I have said nothing about the innocent or guilt of persons who were tortured for the sake of getting information on terrorism. What I asked you was a hypothetical question meant to illustrate that there should be a limit on what you are willing to do to save a loved one, rather than being willing to do anything to save a loved one. Again, would you kill one of my loved ones, to save one of yours, even though mine have done nothing to you?
You call what happened torture, I don't agree and since no high level leadership was interrogated your psychologists opinions are simply their ownNo it is more than my opinion. It is also the opinion of psychologists who have studied the matter and concluded that information obtained by torture has the tendency to be unreliable.
You keep buying the liberal spin, I don't. Obama's head of the CIA disagreed with the report and since no high level management was interviewed I don't put much faith in your opinion or others.Yep and they, like everyone else, will have a tendency to say anything, even if it's not true, to make someone stop torturing them.