I guess Mike Browns 15 minutes are over time for them to move on to the next case to exploit.
But all of that is an aside, because that is not what the majority of protesters want, nor what I am saying. What I am stating is that public officials and civil servants like Law Enforcement should be held accountable for their actions. Now if you're truly against big government or Police-States, would you agree that we should reform or change the laws that currently allow officers like the ones who put Garner in a choke hold walk away with a mere slap on the wrists?
From what I see of this crap so far is that these incidents have been hijacked in favor of the narrative of the moment...For instance, hustlers like Sharpton, and Jackson want to hijack them for their own aggrandizement and enrichment...the Occupy movement (or American Communist movement) wants to foment chaos, and anarchy to overthrow the system of Capitalism. And now we have those anti establishment types railing against law enforcement in very general terms as if these metro areas would be all better without law enforcement. Ridiculous.
All of these people are noise as far as I am concerned. NONE of them will live to the day when they see what they think would make things better. And for all of our sake, I hope they never gain popularity in their opinions.
Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.
Alexis de Tocqueville
There was an opportunity for some high comedy with these protests. They could have all lit up loosies in public buildings, I'd suggest in the mayor's offices. At least I could have had a good laugh.
I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK
Obviously I intended to way exactly what I said. Ie disprove all that bs you wrote, and explain why your statements are VERY racist.
Because of the ACA? can't be that the ACA was a HUGE windfall for insurance company's, and although it did help people get insured, its corporatism not Marxism. If he were a Marxist he would have outlawed insurance company's and made them public. Then he would have outlawed corporations and made some things public (like food, healthcare, schools, and other things everybody needs) and the rest cooperatively owned. Marxism and socialism means you want the people to control the means of production, not private entity's.
Do you even know what a Marxist or socialist is? Apparently not...
Well IF they do l, that's all bushes fault. Bush turned down a deal from them where they would have opened their borders to inspectors and discontinued their nuclear programs except for power distribution. So again, that's on bush 100%The Islamofascists in Iran will have nuclear weapons very soon now.
Furthermore even if they did make a nuke (which I highly doubt they will) they certainly will not be able to make a intercontinental missile or delivery system. So that's really not concerning to us at home anyway...
Wtf is a islamofascist? Making up words now? Who has English as a second language?
FYI fascism is akin to corporatism. Socialism/marxism are polar opposites fascism.
wow I see you have no idea what your talking about.The Caliphate grows in Syria and Iraq. Thanks Obama.
Assad is still in control of Syria. He is Christian.
The Muslims can't even agree on who the caliphate is, they actually have been fighting over it since Muhammad's death. That's what the whole Sunni v shia thing is about. Its a argument about who should take control since Muhammad died!
They have been arguing about this for like 1500 years now! Their are multiple people that call themselves caliphate, that all fight with each other!
Furthermore the caliphate is something like the pope. Its a religious leader and his followers. Saying "the caliphate is growing" in negative context is just putting your xenophobia on display...