Page 166 of 276 FirstFirst ... 66116156164165166167168176216266 ... LastLast
Results 1,651 to 1,660 of 2756

Thread: No Indictment in Chokehold Death [W:1903,2680]

  1. #1651
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Last Seen
    03-03-17 @ 10:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    13,813

    Re: No Indictment in Chokehold Death

    Quote Originally Posted by beefheart View Post
    Yes....no cross examination, which is why it is a joke. Indict and have a trial, that way all the information comes out in a real trial.....what is everyone afraid of? Due process?
    The rules are far more lenient for a grand jury than for a trial. The bar is intentionally set lower than for a trial. I do not believe you understand that.

    Justice was served.

  2. #1652
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,520

    Re: No Indictment in Chokehold Death

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    I just did. Look at the first word in that post. You asked a question and my response was: No.

    Now, you gonna answer mine or run away?
    Do you support the race hustlers?
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  3. #1653
    Bat Chain Puller
    beefheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    The burning sands of the desert southwest.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:08 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    19,370

    Re: No Indictment in Chokehold Death

    Quote Originally Posted by Misterveritis View Post
    The rules are far more lenient for a grand jury than for a trial. The bar is intentionally set lower than for a trial. I do not believe you understand that.

    Justice was served.
    And what percentage of GJ juries result in an indictment?
    "Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana

  4. #1654
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Last Seen
    03-03-17 @ 10:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    13,813

    Re: No Indictment in Chokehold Death

    Quote Originally Posted by ReverendHellh0und View Post
    Lets look at this another way you have haymarket, me, hautey, limbaugh and hannity all in agreement this should never have gotten this far.

    To get to this point something has gone terribly wrong.




    Also deblasio orders police to crack down on illegal ciggys, throws police under bus when they do.


    Nyc and ny created the black market that led to sending officers who end up killin someone over loosies.


    Wtf
    It is time for a tax rebellion.

  5. #1655
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Last Seen
    03-03-17 @ 10:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    13,813

    Re: No Indictment in Chokehold Death

    Quote Originally Posted by clownboy View Post
    You know it's not just the tax. The illegal sellers sell to kids. I'm a smoker who wants to be left alone to smoke and I still think there's a special hell reserved for those who sell drugs, alcohol and smokes to kids.
    Cool. You get your very own special hell? Why not a run of the mill hell? Why special?

  6. #1656
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:22 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    42,081

    Re: No Indictment in Chokehold Death

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Do you support the race hustlers?
    So, you're running away. Good. Cowardly, but good.
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  7. #1657
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Last Seen
    03-03-17 @ 10:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    13,813

    Re: No Indictment in Chokehold Death

    "So you wanted to kill him with Happy Meal instead of arresting him yet one more time?"
    Quote Originally Posted by Hari Seldon View Post
    Correct, I wanted to kill him with a happy meal. Thanks for playing.
    Given his weight your nefarious scheme was clear to me all along.

    You're welcome! :-)

  8. #1658
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Last Seen
    03-03-17 @ 10:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    13,813

    Re: No Indictment in Chokehold Death

    "Correct, I wanted to kill him with a happy meal. Thanks for playing."
    Quote Originally Posted by beefheart View Post
    reductio ad absurdium is wasted on guys like him...
    You have no sense of humor. That can be dangerous when combined with a basic lack of understanding about the topic being discussed.

  9. #1659
    Sage
    Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Golden State
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    41,580

    Re: No Indictment in Chokehold Death

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    What if... Clive Bundy had been dragged out on the streets like a dog for refusing to pay the millions he owed in taxes and parading his gun in front of LEOs?

    We'd have some posters in this thread screaming bloody murder and big government.
    We did anyway.

    They were full of (bleep!), but they were screaming about big government over that one as it was.
    "Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud... [he's] playing the American public for suckers." Mitt Romney

  10. #1660
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Last Seen
    03-03-17 @ 10:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    13,813

    Re: No Indictment in Chokehold Death

    Quote Originally Posted by beefheart View Post
    So...no cross interrogation allowed is fine with you? Can you not see the potential for bias?

    Evidently not.
    Do you understand that witnesses can be directly questioned?

    Maybe you should explain your position. What, in your opinion, is a cross examination?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •