• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ny times publishes officer wilson's address

Grim17 said:
The paper of record my ass... More like the paper to line bird cages with.
Click to expand...

Quit true. It has fallen a great distance when it had established that reputation. But as many things, reputations can be lost and can be earned. Frankly, the NYT has pretty much done everything to lose that reputation, yet many don't believe or acknowledge that it has fallen from the paper of record, to little more than the same journalistic level as the National Esquire.
 
eohrnberger said:
Quit true. It has fallen a great distance when it had established that reputation. But as many things, reputations can be lost and can be earned. Frankly, the NYT has pretty much done everything to lose that reputation, yet many don't believe or acknowledge that it has fallen from the paper of record, to little more than the same journalistic level as the National Esquire.
Click to expand...

at least the new york times is actually capable of reporting the news, unlike something from the blaze or brietbart.
 
Scrabaholic said:
Don't be so smug - anti-choicers have been known to publish the home addresses and phone numbers of doctors. It's despicable no matter who does it.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Doesn't matter who does it for which ideological agenda, it just plain wrong.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
at least the new york times is actually capable of reporting the news, unlike something from the blaze or brietbart.
Click to expand...

And they are in the process of loosing what little of that they have left to the ideologues that are running that enterprise and making the editorial decisions.

The continued fall in readership would seem to indicate that quite clearly.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
at least the new york times is actually capable of reporting the news, unlike something from the blaze or brietbart.
Click to expand...

Defending the indefensible, while at the same time going off topic to take a shot at conservative blogs... That strategy has seen better days.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
at least the new york times is actually capable of reporting the news, unlike something from the blaze or brietbart.
Click to expand...

Not the thread to espouse blind allegiance, I suspect, without looking like a jerk.
 
eohrnberger said:
And they are in the process of loosing what little of that they have left to the ideologues that are running that enterprise and making the editorial decisions.

The continued fall in readership would seem to indicate that quite clearly.
Click to expand...

I just read that they are cutting 30 folks.

I would not be so irresponsible with the written word in this digital age.
 
j-mac said:
If anything happens to Wilson, or his home, he should own the NYT....
Click to expand...

There is no right to privacy in your home address whether you shoot someone or not.
 
Declan said:
There is no right to privacy in your home address whether you shoot someone or not.
Click to expand...

Bull**** there is not.

Bring a valid warrant, and we'll talk.

If not, then they can piss off.
 
Declan said:
There is no right to privacy in your home address whether you shoot someone or not.
Click to expand...

No? Well, there is a right to defend your property, so if I were Wilson, I'd make that point damned clear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom