- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 122,645
- Reaction score
- 27,411
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Says the guy who can't read.
Now I KNOW that was supposed to be sarcasm... but it was pretty bad, TBH. :lol:
Says the guy who can't read.
Now I KNOW that was supposed to be sarcasm... but it was pretty bad, TBH. :lol:
they are in different states
One starts with an "F" and the other starts with an "M"... so not really.
It's emotive language and using it is dishonest.
What the ****? Minnesota and Missouri are states, Ferguson and Minneapolis are cities... :lol:
Not really. There was a clear and simple definition in front of your face, and you blatantly misread it. Did you really think often meant repeatedly in that case?
Not being sarcasm is even worse... when I cross examined people in Court I tore them apart and they didn't recognize it either, until I won the case and the Judges' Decision indicated as such... :lol:
It was great....
The video shows 2 people struck by the car, no one was ran over because the car stopped before that occurred.
The video clearly shows that one woman was run over. That's why she's under the car.
I never mentioned a state. I just thought the incident occurred in Ferguson.
I don't understand how that's a big deal. The guy still ran his car into 5+ people.
You're right, I don't considering illegally gathering in the street and running your car into a group of people on the same level.
The car stopped before driving over her.
That she went under the car does not mean the car drove over her
, and the wheels never made contact with her. Clearly she was not ran over. Please stop using this emotive language.
He mentioned the geography thing and the difference was a different state. You then said they started with F and M. The States. You did not intend to... you just stepped into the pile. That is what is so funny and I am not the only one noticing it either... just admit you made a mistake and move on...
Oh God, don't get into it, or you'll end up with Bodhisattva telling you about his previous court winnings and how Merriam-Webster thinks that cars repeatedly run over dogs.
Please explain how a stopped car is running over someone.
What does me mixing up the cities have to do with geography? No one asked me to point to it on a map. Do you know what geography means? Should I get the dictionary for that?
Holy ****. If you won a court case, it's because the judge gave up.
It *ran* over her before it came to a stop
Well to argue that they were just casually milling about for no reason is being fundamentally dishonest. Maybe next time there'll be a scared kid in the car and you'd really have something to feel proud and happy about.
I see the damage to the car and 2 people on the ground, only one person with minor injuries and the driver was not arrested. That is not consistent with a scenario where people are being ran over.
What does me mixing up the cities have to do with geography? No one asked me to point to it on a map. Do you know what geography means? Should I get the dictionary for that?
Holy ****. If you won a court case, it's because the judge gave up.
2-ton vehicle grinding the body into the pavement requires major injuries. She had only minor injuries consistent with being knocked down, not ran over.
Cars don't kill... people do. Cars are just tools.
I have to do it every time I go to the store during the holidays. Literally have to crawl the car through the crowed. In the morning I'm going to do it again and it's going to look exactly like the beginning of this video. It always does.There is nothing reckless about driving slowly through a crowd. I have done it numerous times... you are just inexperienced and have a political agenda, that's all.
The problem is that that was your very first reason you listed in your answer about why this is just so intrinsically linked to Ferguson now you're trying to be all, "it wasn't important to my point". But how could you have known where it occurred. It's not like it's in the thread title or anything. Oh wait....
The problem is that that was your very first reason you listed in your answer about why this is just so intrinsically linked to Ferguson now you're trying to be all, "it wasn't important to my point". But how could you have known where it occurred. It's not like it's in the thread title or anything. Oh wait....