• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Car plows through protesters during Ferguson rally in south Minneapolis [W:349]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now I KNOW that was supposed to be sarcasm... but it was pretty bad, TBH. :lol:

Not really. There was a clear and simple definition in front of your face, and you blatantly misread it. Did you really think often meant repeatedly in that case?
 
they are in different states

One starts with an "F" and the other starts with an "M"... so not really.

What the ****? Minnesota and Missouri are states, Ferguson and Minneapolis are cities... :lol:
 
What the ****? Minnesota and Missouri are states, Ferguson and Minneapolis are cities... :lol:

I never mentioned a state. I just thought the incident occurred in Ferguson.

I don't understand how that's a big deal. The guy still ran his car into 5+ people.
 
Not really. There was a clear and simple definition in front of your face, and you blatantly misread it. Did you really think often meant repeatedly in that case?

Not being sarcasm is even worse... when I cross examined people in Court I tore them apart and they didn't recognize it either, until I won the case and the Judges' Decision indicated as such... :lol:

It was great....
 
Not being sarcasm is even worse... when I cross examined people in Court I tore them apart and they didn't recognize it either, until I won the case and the Judges' Decision indicated as such... :lol:

It was great....

Great story about you in your imaginary life. Tell me again how cars run over dogs repeatedly? LOL
 
The video clearly shows that one woman was run over. That's why she's under the car.

Oh God, don't get into it, or you'll end up with Bodhisattva telling you about his previous court winnings and how Merriam-Webster thinks that cars repeatedly run over dogs.
 
I never mentioned a state. I just thought the incident occurred in Ferguson.

I don't understand how that's a big deal. The guy still ran his car into 5+ people.

He mentioned the geography thing and the difference was a different state. You then said they started with F and M. The States. You did not intend to... you just stepped into the pile. That is what is so funny and I am not the only one noticing it either... just admit you made a mistake and move on...
 
You're right, I don't considering illegally gathering in the street and running your car into a group of people on the same level.

Well to argue that they were just casually milling about for no reason is being fundamentally dishonest. Maybe next time there'll be a scared kid in the car and you'd really have something to feel proud and happy about.
 
The car stopped before driving over her.

No, the car stopped after it ran her over.

That she went under the car does not mean the car drove over her

I'd say that you're embarrasing yourself, but at this point I don't know if you feel shame

, and the wheels never made contact with her. Clearly she was not ran over. Please stop using this emotive language.

The definition doesn't require the wheels to make contact with her. She was clearly run over
 
He mentioned the geography thing and the difference was a different state. You then said they started with F and M. The States. You did not intend to... you just stepped into the pile. That is what is so funny and I am not the only one noticing it either... just admit you made a mistake and move on...

What does me mixing up the cities have to do with geography? No one asked me to point to it on a map. Do you know what geography means? Should I get the dictionary for that?

Holy ****. If you won a court case, it's because the judge gave up.
 
Oh God, don't get into it, or you'll end up with Bodhisattva telling you about his previous court winnings and how Merriam-Webster thinks that cars repeatedly run over dogs.

Cars don't kill... people do. Cars are just tools.
 
What does me mixing up the cities have to do with geography? No one asked me to point to it on a map. Do you know what geography means? Should I get the dictionary for that?

Holy ****. If you won a court case, it's because the judge gave up.

The opposing lawyer gave up because I used facts, could deconstruct an argument and could stay on point. Well, he didn't give up, he just got out played by a non-lawyer. :lol: Twice...

EDIT: I teach geography scooter...
 
It *ran* over her before it came to a stop

By colliding with her... right? I had a horse collide with me but I was not run over.
 
Well to argue that they were just casually milling about for no reason is being fundamentally dishonest. Maybe next time there'll be a scared kid in the car and you'd really have something to feel proud and happy about.

So your argument is:

1) They should not have been there
2) He had a right to drive into them because they were there and they shouldn't have been

I disagree. But then again, I would have done like the 4 other cars and just gone to the left where there was an open lane.
 
I see the damage to the car and 2 people on the ground, only one person with minor injuries and the driver was not arrested. That is not consistent with a scenario where people are being ran over.

Being ran over is entirely consistent with being ran over and the woman was ran over
 
What does me mixing up the cities have to do with geography? No one asked me to point to it on a map. Do you know what geography means? Should I get the dictionary for that?

Holy ****. If you won a court case, it's because the judge gave up.

The problem is that that was your very first reason you listed in your answer about why this is just so intrinsically linked to Ferguson now you're trying to be all, "it wasn't important to my point". But how could you have known where it occurred. It's not like it's in the thread title or anything. Oh wait....
 
2-ton vehicle grinding the body into the pavement requires major injuries. She had only minor injuries consistent with being knocked down, not ran over.

No one has claimed she was "grinded into the pavement". Stop using emotive language and use realistic language instead as in "she was ran over"
 
Cars don't kill... people do. Cars are just tools.

Let me rephrase:

Oh God, don't get into it, or you'll end up with Bodhisattva telling you about his previous court winnings and how Merriam-Webster thinks that people in cars repeatedly run over dogs.

Was this your court case?

 
There is nothing reckless about driving slowly through a crowd. I have done it numerous times... you are just inexperienced and have a political agenda, that's all.
I have to do it every time I go to the store during the holidays. Literally have to crawl the car through the crowed. In the morning I'm going to do it again and it's going to look exactly like the beginning of this video. It always does.

Anyone who's lived in a populated area knows what this is like as both the driver and pedestrian.

(Beth is crying on Talking Dead...awwww)
 
The problem is that that was your very first reason you listed in your answer about why this is just so intrinsically linked to Ferguson now you're trying to be all, "it wasn't important to my point". But how could you have known where it occurred. It's not like it's in the thread title or anything. Oh wait....

I get it. I made a mistake so you're going to use it to prop up your weak argument. All apologies on that X Factor.

It still doesn't change the fact that I would have gone into the left lane where it was clear and not driven into a group of people (which apparently everyone else in the video was figuring out too).
 
The problem is that that was your very first reason you listed in your answer about why this is just so intrinsically linked to Ferguson now you're trying to be all, "it wasn't important to my point". But how could you have known where it occurred. It's not like it's in the thread title or anything. Oh wait....

A thousand thanks would not be enough... and a fact that he keeps ignoring. He kept bringing up political motives upon others when he is the one with the agenda.

Damn conservatives think running people down is OK because they think Wilson is right... blah blah...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom