Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 74 of 74

Thread: Exclusive: George Stephanopoulos Interviews Police Officer Darren Wilson

  1. #71
    long standing member
    justabubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 03:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    36,132

    Re: Exclusive: George Stephanopoulos Interviews Police Officer Darren Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    The witnesses that were dismissed 1) changed their stories to match the physical evidence, 2) their story didn't match the physical evidence, 3) admitted they didn't see the whole incident, or 4) admitted they didn't see the incident at all.
    and this witness' testimony - the only witness whose story aligned with wilson's - failed criteria numbers 1 and 2
    we are negotiating about dividing a pizza and in the meantime israel is eating it
    once you're over the hill you begin to pick up speed

  2. #72
    Sage

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    USA
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    9,812

    Re: Exclusive: George Stephanopoulos Interviews Police Officer Darren Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
    and this witness' testimony - the only witness whose story aligned with wilson's - failed criteria numbers 1 and 2
    In what meaninful way did the witnesses testimony not match that of the physical evidence? And, no... saying he was walking on the sidewalk or in the street near the curb is not meaningful. Some details being incorrect, are to be expected...

    This is not the same as the blood trail supporting that Brown kept coming towrads the officer, as W10 (and Wilson) indicated - which is meanginful.. This is not the same as multiple witnesses saying Brown got shot in the back (which we know is untrue) and is meanginful .... This is not the same as a witness indcating that the first shot was to Brown's head then the officer approached and unloaded into a kneeling and surrendering Brown - which we also know is untrue and would be meaningful.

    I admittedly couldn't get through the ridculousness of Odonnel's report... but from the two piece I saw.. It's dumb. Maybe you can summarize what you found so good about it...

  3. #73
    Sage
    Excon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Seen
    10-14-17 @ 01:26 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,997

    Re: Exclusive: George Stephanopoulos Interviews Police Officer Darren Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by buck View Post
    In what meaninful way did the witnesses testimony not match that of the physical evidence? And, no... saying he was walking on the sidewalk or in the street near the curb is not meaningful. Some details being incorrect, are to be expected...

    This is not the same as the blood trail supporting that Brown kept coming towrads the officer, as W10 (and Wilson) indicated - which is meanginful.. This is not the same as multiple witnesses saying Brown got shot in the back (which we know is untrue) and is meanginful .... This is not the same as a witness indcating that the first shot was to Brown's head then the officer approached and unloaded into a kneeling and surrendering Brown - which we also know is untrue and would be meaningful.

    I admittedly couldn't get through the ridculousness of Odonnel's report... but from the two piece I saw.. It's dumb. Maybe you can summarize what you found so good about it...
    You nailed it.
    “The law is reason, free from passion.”
    Aristotle
    (≚ᄌ≚)

  4. #74
    Sage
    Excon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Seen
    10-14-17 @ 01:26 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,997

    Re: Exclusive: George Stephanopoulos Interviews Police Officer Darren Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
    one witness confirmed wilson's story
    watch that witness' testimony be impeached in this video:
    O'Donnell, as well as his take on it, is idiotic.

    He attaches to much importance to the mentioning of one of the witnesses in a press conference.
    He assumes what retell means as it could mean he had already told it to the press or it could simply be the fact that the idiot O'Donnell got this from the FBI interview so of course he already told it to the other investigative agency which there is a record of.
    And then he wrongly assumes what this means. "I seen the two guys walkin' down the street on the same sidewalk that I was on ..."
    The witness clearly says they were walking down the Street. And as he said street, his following use of sidewalk would indicate he that it was the same street of the sidewalk he was on.

    The guy is clearly saying they were in the street.
    O'Donnell just doesn't like the verdict, probably because of his anti-gun nuttery and is grasping.
    So no, he didn't impeach anything and he made no compelling argument.
    If he had been able to present that foolishness to the GJ, they would have laughed him out of the room.

    Quote Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
    your loss. he made a very compelling argument against the manner in which the grand jury was manipulated by the prosecutor
    No he didn't.
    He made some absurd statements that he can't back up.

    He neglected to tell you (lied) that there were other witnesses that said Brown was moving toward the Officer. Witness 48 specifically indicated that Brown was running at the Officer.

    He doesn't get it and never will.

    He says there is no real reason to believe Officer Wilson's account of Brown charging him.
    That is bs.
    There is reason to believe such and such an assertion is credible.


    He charges the Officer shooting at him. D'oh!


    Of course Brown charging Wilson is credible.
    “The law is reason, free from passion.”
    Aristotle
    (≚ᄌ≚)

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •