• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congress

Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Misterveritis said:
I understand your need to dismiss.

To what crusade do you refer? Do you type whatever pops into your head? I believe you do.
Click to expand...

If you have to ask, it went right over your head. Not surprised. And yes, when you have a GOP-led investigation against a DEM administration, I'll dismiss it and accept their findings. Now does that mean that Obama and Hillary did everything right or correct? Absolutely not, in fact I think they were quite incompetent in how they acting in their actions leading up to and beyond. However, the investigation determined that nothing ILLEGAL happened.

Just because nothing ILLEGAL happened, doesn't mean they did everything right. That is what you simply cannot grasp and is why your comments are nothing by partisan garbage.

You just don't accept it because you are as partisan as they come and your comments have NO logic to them.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

MMC said:
It depends on how it is brought out.....as to the Select Committee. Its difference is in the action it can take. Whereas the other committees (plural) couldn't take any action.

Although the Senate Committee did file the lawsuit to Compel Morrell to Testify as to who was changing talking points. All it took was filing it to the court and presto chango. Someone grabs the Mic. Not many mention that part. Especially not those on the left here. Its like they were trying to avoid that fact.

It isn't purely for politics when none has taken any responsibility other than saying those words. Moreover.....Clinton never checked back on her people to see if they made it out alive. Which was confirmed by herself that she did not speak to anyone until the next morning, after talking to Hicks.

While not a crime in itself.....it does point to her True Character.
Click to expand...

Which Republicans are sure to deal with in attack ads during the campaign season. They will probably go with that against Clinton no matter if this "special panel" was created or not, they find anything or not, and it results in any action or not.

So, political motivations this is certainly most about. It has to be, the timing even supports the notion.

What tires me most about this is we have yet more cost and time into this effort that is devoid of finding the actual truth on what happened over there. I'm sorry, I just do not buy the Republican hype on this any longer as being sincere on this matter. Politically Republicans will gain far more than the families of those involved possibly can from this effort. I would agree, that is sad but very accurate.
 
Last edited:
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

TheNextEra said:
If you have to ask, it went right over your head. Not surprised.
Click to expand...
Perhaps you are not a very good communicator. And like the Lawless One, you must blame others for your own self imposed inadequacies.

And yes, when you have a GOP-led investigation against a DEM administration, I'll dismiss it and accept their findings.
Click to expand...
Without the powers of a select committee it was never likely that any of the myriad fractured investigations would uncover anything. Those investigations bought time for the regime. Now years have passed and Boehner chooses to do what he should have done at the beginning.

I believe Boehner has been let off his leash but only just a little. He can drag out the process for another year or so. I think this is what is likely to happen.

Now does that mean that Obama and Hillary did everything right or correct? Absolutely not, in fact I think they were quite incompetent in how they acting in their actions leading up to and beyond. However, the investigation determined that nothing ILLEGAL happened.
Click to expand...
You are not paying attention. I understand why. Unless the investigation is by a select committee it is unlikely to discover the truth. Were any of the previous House investigations done by select committees with professional investigative staffs?

Just because nothing ILLEGAL happened, doesn't mean they did everything right. That is what you simply cannot grasp and is why your comments are nothing by partisan garbage.

You just don't accept it because you are as partisan as they come and your comments have NO logic to them.
Click to expand...
You are not paying attention. I understand why.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Misterveritis said:
Without the powers of a select committee it was never likely that any of the myriad fractured investigations would uncover anything. Those investigations bought time for the regime. Now years have passed and Boehner chooses to do what he should have done at the beginning.

I believe Boehner has been let off his leash but only just a little. He can drag out the process for another year or so. I think this is what is likely to happen.
Click to expand...

And this is why you aren't taken seriously. You have a PRE-MADE determination of what happened and since none of the facts support your claim, it MUST be that Boehner was helping Obama.

Your comments only PROVE your partisan hackery. You won't be satisfied until something, ANYTHING supports your claims and you will dismiss ANY and ALL facts until that happens.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Fenton said:
Hillary doesn't scare anyone, ( maybe herself when she looks in the mirror every morning )

She went out and campaigned for Democrats in the Mid terms.

Did it help ? NO

Did Democrats who ran on being " Clinton " Democrats win their elections ? NO

Has Marry Landrieu of Louisiana called Hillary down to help her Win her run-off election ? NO

She's as toxic as Obama.
Click to expand...
Than why keep bringing up Benghazi? A Republican led committee found no wrong doing with the Obama administration's handling of the matter. Why Lindsey Graham (R SC) is cussing out his own party for having the gumption of showing actual objectivity with their findings instead of sticking with the usual "go team go; raw team raw" attitude.

Mollie Z Hemmingway of the Federalist is having a conniption and Newt Gingrich is having a theory that probably deserves to be thought of as belonging to some far-fetched tabloid. :roll:

I'll say it again: the GOP is frightened of that Hillary run off in 16.

Yep. The toilet will have some much money thrown down it that a plunger will be useless; it's more like a job for Roto-Rooter. :roll:

House Republicans Now Also Covering Up Benghazi Scandal
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

OrphanSlug said:
Which Republicans are sure to deal with in attack ads during the campaign season. They will probably go with that against Clinton no matter if this "special panel" was created or not, they find anything or not, and it results in any action or not.

So, political motivations this is certainly most about. It has to be, the timing even supports the notion.

What tires me most about this is we have yet more cost and time into this effort that is devoid of finding the actual truth on what happened over there. I'm sorry, I just do not buy the Republican hype on this any longer as being sincere on this matter. Politically Republicans will gain far more than the families of those involved possibly can from this effort. I would agree, that is sad but very accurate.
Click to expand...


Well, I didn't say it wasn't politics. As Boehner knows that the State Dept and CIA and Intel Agencies are pointing the finger at each other, for the mistakes made and whatever Regulations that were missed or people were Derelict with. Then the deception that was played out for the American people.

The Bottomline was BO and his team were caught with their pants down in an election. They thought not much required attention. They had AQ on the run. BL was dead. BO thought he could hear the Fat Lady Singing.

FatLadySings.gif



He just didn't know it was the Blues!
argue.gif
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

danarhea said:
What do you do if a Republican-led committee clears the administration of wrongdoing in Benghazi? You create another Benghazi committee. You keep creating those committees until you get the results you want. And, if you never get the results you want, you keep this issue on top of other issues like the economy. Jeez!! Talk about Congress "going off the rails on a crazy train" (Thanx, Ozzy).

Article is here.
Click to expand...

No this is to hurt Hilary pure and simple. By doing this, they can keep calling her and her people in and getting the story in the media during her campaign for the 2016 nomination and run for President.

It is a filthy political tactic that should be beneath any real politician or political party.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

"Without the powers of a select committee it was never likely that any of the myriad fractured investigations would uncover anything. Those investigations bought time for the regime. Now years have passed and Boehner chooses to do what he should have done at the beginning.

I believe Boehner has been let off his leash but only just a little. He can drag out the process for another year or so. I think this is what is likely to happen."
TheNextEra said:
And this is why you aren't taken seriously. You have a PRE-MADE determination of what happened and since none of the facts support your claim, it MUST be that Boehner was helping Obama.
Click to expand...
I suppose it is possible that Boehner remained drunk this entire time. It is far more likely that the Obama regime got something on Boehner just as they got something on Chief Justice Roberts. After all, we are spending many tens of billions of dollars to spy on Americans each year.

Your comments only PROVE your partisan hackery. You won't be satisfied until something, ANYTHING supports your claims and you will dismiss ANY and ALL facts until that happens.
Click to expand...
Right. I suppose we shall see. If Boehner fully funds and staffs the select committee in January and if the hearings begin in March or April, then you may be right. Let's see what happens.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

MMC said:
Nah Republicans didn't lose any credibility. Which is why you can't figure out that no....that's no one. Has taken any responsibility for hiring Ansar al Sharia as security. The very same people who attacked us. In addition to you using the usual left's manic whines about nothing there. I noticed you didn't have to much to say about what is still classified. Did you wan't to try and Deny that there isn't any of that too? Now don't be confused by any of that meaning.....Classified. :roll:

Was it really hard for you to actually figure out how committees work? Do you even know how party politics works with committees? I mean was it so hard to admit that you didn't know how committees work with investigations.

Tell you what, rather than you just talk and shake, rattle and ho hum about Benghazi. Don't, as it leaves you looking like you absolutely have no clue as to how reality played out.
funny.gif
Click to expand...

Still here? Remember MMC, 6 investigations, 6 Republican investigations, and nothing.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Misterveritis said:
A reasonable question to ask is why didn't Boehner begin this with a select committee? I believe he was helping the cover-up. Any number of fractured investigations done by politicians without the aid of qualified investigators will go nowhere. A select committee with a qualified staff, the right to depose witnesses and question them under oath may uncover the truth. Boehner knows it. So why did he wait until now?
Click to expand...

So Boehner is now going to uncover what he helped cover up? :lol: Keep the conspiracy theory together.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

"A reasonable question to ask is why didn't Boehner begin this with a select committee? I believe he was helping the cover-up. Any number of fractured investigations done by politicians without the aid of qualified investigators will go nowhere. A select committee with a qualified staff, the right to depose witnesses and question them under oath may uncover the truth. Boehner knows it. So why did he wait until now?"
Hatuey said:
So Boehner is now going to uncover what he helped cover up? :lol: Keep the conspiracy theory together.
Click to expand...
If you read further it should be clear, even to you, that time is not a friend of a serious investigation.

I won't bother to repeat it. Keep reading at your own pace.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Hatuey said:
Still here? Remember MMC, 6 investigations, 6 Republican investigations, and nothing.
Click to expand...

Are you still trying to talk about Benghazi Hatuey? :shock: Now that's some funny ****! :roll:

Tell me.....were you still having a hard time with what is still classified? Do you have the Answer to that question on who hired Ansar al Sharia.

Here I will be merciful and give you a clue.....it wasn't the CIA or any Intel Agency.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

MMC said:
Are you still trying to talk about Benghazi Hatuey? :shock: Now that's some funny ****! :roll:

Tell me.....were you still having a hard time with what is still classified? Do you have the Answer to that question on who hired Ansar al Sharia.

Here I will be merciful and give you a clue.....it wasn't the CIA or any Intel Agency.
Click to expand...

MMC, you don't get it yet? You're so desperate to find something to point to that all you've got is: What about the stuff I don't have access to!?!? That's pretty typical of a conspiracy theorist. It's a person who isn't satisfied with the opposing party's investigations, he's not satisfied with the government's response and now all they have is the stuff they can't get to because they're not a significant enough to get access to it. You should read a book called The Great Derangement. It talks about how conspiracy theorists try to make themselves feel important by promoting ideas that only they feel they have the answer to. However, no matter how many investigations and evidence are presented to the contrary, they still believe these theories because that's all they have to give importance to their lives. The belief that they and they alone know what happened and everyone else is lying. It's pretty saddening.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Misterveritis said:
"A reasonable question to ask is why didn't Boehner begin this with a select committee? I believe he was helping the cover-up. Any number of fractured investigations done by politicians without the aid of qualified investigators will go nowhere. A select committee with a qualified staff, the right to depose witnesses and question them under oath may uncover the truth. Boehner knows it. So why did he wait until now?"

If you read further it should be clear, even to you, that time is not a friend of a serious investigation.

I won't bother to repeat it. Keep reading at your own pace.
Click to expand...

Ah, so now the investigation won't uncover what you feel it should have uncovered because Boehner is an Obama lackey who... helped cover it up? :)
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Hatuey said:
MMC, you don't get it yet? You're so desperate to find something to point to that all you've got is: What about the stuff I don't have access to!?!? That's pretty typical of a conspiracy theorist. It's a person who isn't satisfied with the opposing party's investigations, he's not satisfied with the government's response and now all they have is the stuff they can't get to because they're not a significant enough to get access to it. You should read a book called The Great Derangement. It talks about how conspiracy theorists try to make themselves feel important by promoting ideas that only they feel they have the answer to. However, no matter how many investigations and evidence is presented to the contrary, they still believe these theories because that's all they have to give importance to their lives. The belief that they and they alone know what happened and everyone else is lying. It's pretty saddening.
Click to expand...


Look, I can't help it you can't follow the media or people who are on the issue. When all of them are saying there is still classified material. Then that's what it is....not some made up BS from your mind.

You have Intel People say there is still classified information themselves. Hence Gowdy taking depositions. Then you have Military people saying there is classified material. DOD, General Dempsey, an Admiral Kirby.

Then you have your Prima Donna Drama Queen. Saying there are still answers that are needed to certain questions.

Pretty much puts you in the.....Still not knowing and come up with any ole excuse dept.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

MMC said:
Look, I can't help it you can't follow the media or people who are on the issue. When all of them are saying there is still classified material. Then that's what it is....not some made up BS from your mind.
Click to expand...

Who are all of them? The media dropped this issue months ago or have you not seen the reports that even FOX News avoided mention of the latest Benghazi investigation? See this why is your conspiracy theory is laughable. You think there are a significant number of people who want answers... actually all the people who are politically insignificant want the answer. The reality however is that you don't like the answers you've gotten. You don't like the answers you got from Obama, so now you're on the 6th, count it, 6th investigation to try and prove your beliefs. So now, you're saying that if only had access to classified information - which let's face it, is really no different than saying there are JFK/Moonlanding/9-11 documents you didn't get to see - you'd be sure to prove someone is guilty of something.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Hatuey said:
Who are all of them? The media dropped this issue months ago or have you not seen the reports that even FOX News avoided mention of the latest Benghazi investigation? See this why is your conspiracy theory is laughable. You think there are a significant number of people who want answers... actually all the people who are politically insignificant want the answer. The reality however is that you don't like the answers you've gotten. You don't like the answers you got from Obama, so now you're on the 6th, count it, 6th investigation to try and prove your beliefs. So now, you're saying that if only had access to classified information - which let's face it, is really no different than saying there are JFK/Moonlanding/9-11 documents you didn't get to see - you'd be sure to prove someone is guilty of something.
Click to expand...


You keep thinking you can use this report? You can't even figure out it is the CIA and Intel saying its not them. Anything Else talking about Rice is or the Intel is BS.

Here from this report that you think you can tout.


But Rice's comments were based on faulty intelligence from multiple agencies, according to the report. Analysts received 21 reports that a protest occurred in Benghazi, the report said - 14 from the Open Source Center, which reviews news reports; one from the CIA; two from the Defense Department; and four from the National Security Agency.

"To this day," the report said, "significant intelligence gaps regarding the identities, affiliations and motivations of the attackers remain.".....snip~

Benghazi report from Republican-led House panel debunks allegations - CBS News


Again.....If they are gaps in the Intel. It is a failure. Who took Responsibility, again?

Who refused to listen to the Libyans giving us 3 days warning before 911? Was it CIA or State? Do you have that Answer? As it cannot be denied that the Libyans gave our people 3 days advance notice. Who ignored the Libyans?
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

MMC said:
You keep thinking you can use this report? You can't even figure out it is the CIA and Intel saying its not them. Anything Else talking about Rice is or the Intel is BS.

Here from this report that you think you can tout.


But Rice's comments were based on faulty intelligence from multiple agencies, according to the report. Analysts received 21 reports that a protest occurred in Benghazi, the report said - 14 from the Open Source Center, which reviews news reports; one from the CIA; two from the Defense Department; and four from the National Security Agency.

"To this day," the report said, "significant intelligence gaps regarding the identities, affiliations and motivations of the attackers remain.".....snip~

Benghazi report from Republican-led House panel debunks allegations - CBS News


Again.....If they are gaps in the Intel. It is a failure. Who took Responsibility, again?

Who refused to listen to the Libyans giving us 3 days warning before 911? Was it CIA or State? Do you have that Answer? As it cannot be denied that the Libyans gave our people 3 days advance notice. Who ignored the Libyans?
Click to expand...

Do you believe if you post longer and longer posts, your conspiracy theory will be seen as truth?
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Here is Graham the Neo Con.....now as much as you don't like him. Watch how he puts Gloria Borgia in check when she thinks she is Preaching the Gospel.





Who filed the lawsuit and got the testimony without having to go to court? Now there was the lie about changing the talking points. Then there was the I misspoke moment or well it wasn't us that changed the talking points excuse from multiple depts. Then the actual of testimony of who admitted to doing it and given an excuse as to why.


What was Graham saying again?
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Hatuey said:
Do you believe if you post longer and longer posts, your conspiracy theory will be seen as truth?
Click to expand...

Nah....in the end. The only thing that will matter, is most will know that you don't know **** about Benghazi. I'm good with that!
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Hatuey said:
Ah, so now the investigation won't uncover what you feel it should have uncovered because Boehner is an Obama lackey who... helped cover it up? :)
Click to expand...
LOL. You really are a piece of work.

Had Boehner wanted to uncover the truth he would have created the select committee immediately. He waited for two years. That is plenty of time for witnesses to determine what the right answers are, to destroy documents that might contradict them, to weave a believable tale.

I think Boehner was warned not to by the regime. I have some ideas on why but they don't really matter for this discussion.

So here we are two years later. A select committee will require members and a budget of 5-10 million dollars. If Boehner has this set up in January so witnesses may be deposed beginning in March or April then we might have a real investigation. If it takes until April to get this set up and if the budget is a million or two then we don't have a real investigation. It moves from a cover up to a slow roll to run out the clock.

The question is why has Boehner done this.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

And ...to repeat...


benghazi_zps6270ab3c.jpg
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

MMC said:
Nah....in the end. The only thing that will matter, is most will know that you don't know **** about Benghazi. I'm good with that!
Click to expand...

MMC, yes we know - you have the answers to it all. Wait, no you don't - you're just a guy who thinks there are other answers that will make someone guilty of something. :) The fact that you keep posting lynch-kings like Graham is just laughable. Remember when he tried to get to the bottom of Bill Clinton getting a blowjob? How did that turn out? Was Clinton found guilty of anything important? Perjury? Over a blowjob? Lol.
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

MMC said:
Who has taken the weight at State for Hiring Ansar al Sharia as Security for Benghazi? <<<<< Simple question. Why can't the Left come up with any ****ing answer?
Click to expand...


MMC said:
Who Hired Ansar al Sharia at State to be US security for Benghazi? Did it come out during the investigations tht this took place?
Click to expand...


MMC said:
Again, who hired Ansar al Sharia at the State Dept. So much for that BS you tried to play here. Do you always need to fabricate some lie with what you can't handle? What.....you still can't come up with that answer.? Why is this not surprising coming from you? What all that so called intellect that you thought you had. Still can't figure out how much of Benghazi is still classified.

You do look quite foolish talking about conspiracy theories When the State Dept already admitted Ansar al Sharia was hired as security.
Click to expand...

MMC said:
Nah Republicans didn't lose any credibility. Which is why you can't figure out that no....that's no one. Has taken any responsibility for hiring Ansar al Sharia as security. The very same people who attacked us. In addition to you using the usual left's manic whines about nothing there. I noticed you didn't have to much to say about what is still classified. Did you wan't to try and Deny that there isn't any of that too? Now don't be confused by any of that meaning.....Classified. :roll:
Click to expand...

MMC said:
Are you still trying to talk about Benghazi Hatuey? :shock: Now that's some funny ****! :roll:

Tell me.....were you still having a hard time with what is still classified? Do you have the Answer to that question on who hired Ansar al Sharia.
Click to expand...

Here, let me help you on this since you seem stuck on it.

Information available after the attacks confirms that the reports the Team received at the time were not accurate. The CIA has no information that Ansar al-Sharia provided security for the Benghazi Medical Center prior to or during the attacks on the U.S. facilities in Benghazi. Instead, at the time of the attacks, Ansar al-Sharia was tasked with providing security for a different hospital in Benghazi --- the al-Jala hospital --- as part of the local government’s effort to delegate security responsibility to militias to counter rising instability and to moderate the group’s extremist agenda, according to clandestine reporting.
Click to expand...

http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi%20Report.pdf

I mean, have you even read the report?

MMC said:
You keep thinking you can use this report? You can't even figure out it is the CIA and Intel saying its not them. Anything Else talking about Rice is or the Intel is BS.

Here from this report that you think you can tout.


But Rice's comments were based on faulty intelligence from multiple agencies, according to the report. Analysts received 21 reports that a protest occurred in Benghazi, the report said - 14 from the Open Source Center, which reviews news reports; one from the CIA; two from the Defense Department; and four from the National Security Agency.

"To this day," the report said, "significant intelligence gaps regarding the identities, affiliations and motivations of the attackers remain.".....snip~

Benghazi report from Republican-led House panel debunks allegations - CBS News


Again.....If they are gaps in the Intel. It is a failure. Who took Responsibility, again?

Who refused to listen to the Libyans giving us 3 days warning before 911? Was it CIA or State? Do you have that Answer? As it cannot be denied that the Libyans gave our people 3 days advance notice. Who ignored the Libyans?
Click to expand...

Did you read the whole article or not? From your own link:

But it was intelligence analysts, not political appointees, who made the wrong call, the committee found. The report did not conclude that Rice or any other government official acted in bad faith or intentionally misled the American people.
Click to expand...

In the years since, some participants in the attack have said they were motivated by the video. The attackers were a mix of extremists and hangers on, the investigation found.
Click to expand...


Geez. :roll:
 
Re: Boehner: I'm ready to 'reappoint' members to special Benghazi panel in new Congre

Misterveritis said:
LOL. You really are a piece of work.

Had Boehner wanted to uncover the truth he would have created the select committee immediately. He waited for two years. That is plenty of time for witnesses to determine what the right answers are, to destroy documents that might contradict them, to weave a believable tale.

I think Boehner was warned not to by the regime. I have some ideas on why but they don't really matter for this discussion.

So here we are two years later. A select committee will require members and a budget of 5-10 million dollars. If Boehner has this set up in January so witnesses may be deposed beginning in March or April then we might have a real investigation. If it takes until April to get this set up and if the budget is a million or two then we don't have a real investigation. It moves from a cover up to a slow roll to run out the clock.

The question is why has Boehner done this.
Click to expand...

So then Boehner is in cahoots with Obama? Yes?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom