Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: U.S. Agencies Review Policy on Hostages

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Seen
    12-22-14 @ 06:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    77

    U.S. Agencies Review Policy on Hostages

    The Obama administration confirmed on Tuesday that it was reviewing its policy on securing the release of United States citizens taken hostage abroad, but that the ban on paying ransom would not change.

    Word of the review, disclosed by an under secretary of defense in a letter to a Republican lawmaker, came as the administration was grappling with a series of beheadings of American captives by the Islamic State militant group, which posted a video Sunday announcing the third such killing.

    Some family members of hostages have criticized what they see as an unacceptable refusal by the administration to grant concessions, including ransom payments, to hostage-takers.

    Unlike European governments, which have paid many millions of dollars in ransom to win the release of citizens held by the Islamic State or other militant groups, the United States has said it will never pay money to rescue its citizens. It has also privately pressed other governments not to pay.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/wo...ml?ref=us&_r=0

    I just donít understand that. Yes, thereís an official position of the government. All right, the government doesnít care about its citizens getting in trouble abroad. Itís not going to pay ransom, itís not going to rescue them, no matter how important or useful for the country they are or might be. Itís the official position and it can be understood (even if it doesnít work, and the number or kidnappings still increases while this policy was supposed to do the opposite).
    But I donít understand why the hell the government imposes its position in the families of the hostages and tries to influence other countries to make them act the same. Why does the government think it has the right to intervene in the private affairs of other people and other countries? What might happen if other countries start doing the same? Nothing good, I suppose.
    And the third thing I donít understand is why there are exceptions from this policy. Why was it possible to exchange Bergdahl for five talib leaders? Now these people are in charge of ISIS. What is the justification of this hypocritical action? I donít see any.

  2. #2
    Sage
    Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Golden State
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    41,596

    Re: U.S. Agencies Review Policy on Hostages

    Quote Originally Posted by Tameamea View Post
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/wo...ml?ref=us&_r=0

    I just don’t understand that. Yes, there’s an official position of the government. All right, the government doesn’t care about its citizens getting in trouble abroad. It’s not going to pay ransom, it’s not going to rescue them, no matter how important or useful for the country they are or might be. It’s the official position and it can be understood (even if it doesn’t work, and the number or kidnappings still increases while this policy was supposed to do the opposite).
    But I don’t understand why the hell the government imposes its position in the families of the hostages and tries to influence other countries to make them act the same. Why does the government think it has the right to intervene in the private affairs of other people and other countries? What might happen if other countries start doing the same? Nothing good, I suppose.
    And the third thing I don’t understand is why there are exceptions from this policy. Why was it possible to exchange Bergdahl for five talib leaders? Now these people are in charge of ISIS. What is the justification of this hypocritical action? I don’t see any.
    Paying ransom to the hostage takers will encourage them to take more hostages, thus endangering still more lives. That's the justification for the no ransom policy.
    "Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud... [he's] playing the American public for suckers." Mitt Romney

  3. #3
    Sage

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Last Seen
    12-04-17 @ 09:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    12,361

    Re: U.S. Agencies Review Policy on Hostages

    Quote Originally Posted by Tameamea View Post
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/wo...ml?ref=us&_r=0
    But I don’t understand why the hell the government imposes its position in the families of the hostages and tries to influence other countries to make them act the same.
    You don't understand? The goal of goverment is to gain and maintain power and control. It will take as much as it can get away with. It has always been that way with every government in history.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •