"If you can't stand the way this place is, Take yourself to higher places!"
Break, By Three days grace
Hilliary Clinton/Tim Kaine 2016
And every time you post to me tres borrachos, you use my name, which I didn't with you until now.
I won't bother anymore since that's your style and it is clear what you're trying to do.
And yes Obama inherited a horrific immigration problem as with all the other remainders from last decade.
And yes, the GOP has put up fierce resistance to solving any of these problems for six years.
Loyal opposition my ass .
Chemists Have Solutions .
Don't think me callous - of course it's a risk many are willing to take - but there is no reason to guarantee anything. What you think is inhumane is irrelevant and subjective.
“I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.
Horse sense is the thing a horse has which keeps it from betting on people. ~W.C. Fields
Those over 18 are offered all 3 choices and are adults. Again, we should endevour to keep their trasnport with their relatives as much as possible, but if it isn't logistically feasible then so be it.
Those parents with Children under the age of 18, and those children are U.S. Citizens, have the choice to either have the child come with them (in which case the government will pick up the bill for their transport, just as if we were deporting them) or enter the children into the orphanage systems we already have place in this country until such point that they are legally allowed to return to the country.
Most likely, with a streamlined legal immigration law, the best choice for such parents in the second paragraph would be to take option 2 (go home and be absolved of all immigration related crimes), have their US Citizen child come with them, and then utilize the fact the child is a US Citizen as a means of apply for legal entry into the country through the proper system.
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.
“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman
Anti-Democracy advocate, Mixed government is the only good government
THE second point to be examined is, whether the [constitutional ]convention were authorized to frame and propose this mixed Constitution.
However, to your point about commerce... if we loan money to foreign countries, we get interest for that loan - that is commerce. If we GIVE money to foreign countries, in return for actions that we require they make (like not assisting our foes) then that is the same as buying their services - that is commerce.
My point is, that it would not be difficult at all for the Congress to argue in court that the aid they send to other countries is within their power to regulate commerce with foreign nations. Not that I agree or disagree with foreign aid through and by this argument, just that it's possible to be argued and won in court rather easily.
Everything in your life is a reflection of a choice you have made. If you want a different result, don't blame someone else, or expect others to make a change, you should stop complaining and make a different choice. Remember, the circumstances of your birth don't determine the outcome of your life.