Just more of the same moral justifications, as though when it comes to Obama there are different rules.
Obamalemming "He won didn't he? Romney is a moron!"
Critic: "it was wrong"
Obamalemming: "so what? Bush lied."
So, wasn't this Obama brand supposed to be better than the other brands? Wasn't this brand critical of the brand before?
But it seems he has adopted all the worst of his predecessors [except getting caught getting his knob polished in the Oval Office] and that's OK because Bush, Bush, Reagan, Eisenhower, and Nixon did it too.
That kind of reads to me like the LOWEST common denominator as opposed to what was promised as a highest common denominator.