- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Whats your point? They passed to "partially reverse"... Not fully? And at the end point they still kept the majority of the ban in part...
Assad.
Really? "Several people"? As far as I can tell the only person doing that current has been myself, while the rest who have kept active on this thread you, US Con, Grant and others have been focused on "ITS ALL BO's FAULT!".
"All available means"? So, continuous, just about never ending occupation and war. Sounds like the military industrial complex is in for a big time $$$ maker.
The point was.....the one link pointed out other Sunni Arabs had or were making attacks. Which the Baathist were against the US and Iraqi government.
Assad was fighting the Syrian Rebels and we do have the threads up on what was taking place. He rarely was going after AQ of Iraq.
Yes Really.....as the Narrative of going back to Bush. Doesn't relate. Nor does the excuses over BO's Foreign Policy. Are you trying to State that both of BO's S.O.Ds got it wrong with what they told the Entire country? Why is it no Foreign Policy experts carry the narrative......like you do. Looking for any excuse, any technicality, and trying to Blame Bush for AQ being back in Iraq......after being driven out or their so called retreating.
So Continuous?????? Not when.....one offers the poor in that region a way out poverty, as one of those means and ways.