• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans[W:466]

Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

The editorial staff allowed to write his article for the Picayune.
I did not say they did not, but as I just posted, they also printed DeBerry's article of support for the Senator.

Don't me wrong, the Picayune is still and will always be a Left wing propaganda rag, just not for Mary.
Uh, they have not reversed their endorsement for the Senator.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

Funny, you won't show any of it though. ;)



So you have no voting record of any of them? Hmmm. Interesting. I wonder why? Well, let's see:

http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/w/Northern_Democratic_Party?rec=2121

What you have is the first three civil rights acts pushed by Republicans in Republican controlled congresses and in one case overturning a Democratic Presidential veto. You do not have (Until Humphrey) Democrats pushing civil rights issues.


Alright, so we have that as early as the 1850s, the Democrats had split in two over... well you guessed it race. This lasted until AT LEAST 1860. Strike one for the claim that it was a homogenous movement of anti-civil rights within the Democrats. So now, let's address the fact that Republicans passing civil rights act shall we (well aside from the fact that you have no voting records):

The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow | PBS



Compromise of 1877 - U.S. Presidents - HISTORY.com



Alright, so what do we have. We have, Northern and Southern Democrats being split before the civil war. We have Republicans handing back control to Democrats in the 1870s and we have this:

THE DEATH OF RECONSTRUCTION - Heather Cox RICHARDSON - Google Books

View attachment 67175290

Well! My oh my! We have Northern Democrats courting black voters, we have Southern Democrats attacking them. Hey, the pattern doesn't seem to change much and look, I got all my sourcing. Do you? ;) Well, I know you don't but do you know what all of these things put together mean? They mean that the Democratic Party wasn't the united force you keep presenting it as EVEN in the 19th century.




Please do, they'll display your ignorance on this topic to an even wider extent.

What you actually have is Democrats split over slavery. In the 1850s you had a new wave of Democrats in the north "The young Americans" embracing technology and industry and opposing slavery for economic reasons. Slave labor produced poorly compared to free labor in industrial endeavors. This doesn't in anyway imply that they supported equality between blacks and whites. In addition to the CRAs you also have the 13th through 15th amendments, pushed by Republicans. Also pushed by Republicans was the 19th Amendment, originally introduced some 40 years before adoption by....a republican, and passed with greater Republican support than Democratic. Republicans put forth nearly 200 anti-lynching laws that were all blocked by Democrats between 1882 and 1968.

The split in the Democratic party before the war resulted in the Free-soilers joining with the Whigs to form the Republican party. What you had left in the North were northern Democrats that did not leave the party over the issue of slavery, and continued to support southern Democrats.

Coincidentally, the first African-Americans, the First Asian American, and the First Female elected to office were all Republicans. This, more than anything, supports that these policies were Republican pushed not only by Elected Republicans....but by their constituents.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29576

From the Democratic party plank of 1856:

Resolved, That we reiterate with renewed energy of purpose the well considered declarations of former Conventions upon the sectional issue of Domestic slavery, and concerning the reserved rights of the States.

1. That Congress has no power under the Constitution, to interfere with or control the domestic institutions of the several States, and that such States are the sole and proper judges of everything appertaining to their own affairs, not prohibited by the Constitution; that all efforts of the abolitionists, or others, made to induce Congress to interfere with questions of slavery, or to take incipient steps in relation thereto, are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences; and that all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people and endanger the stability and permanency of the Union, and ought not to be countenanced by any friend of our political institutions.

2. That the foregoing proposition covers, and was intended to embrace the whole subject of slavery agitation in Congress; and therefore, the Democratic party of the Union, standing on this national platform, will abide by and adhere to a faithful execution of the acts known as the compromise measures, settled by the Congress of 1850; "the act for reclaiming fugitives from service or labor," included; which act being designed to carry out an express provision of the Constitution, cannot, with fidelity thereto, be repealed, or so changed as to destroy or impair its efficiency.

3. That the Democratic party will resist all attempts at renewing, in Congress or out of it, the agitation of the slavery question under whatever shape or color the attempt may be made.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

And you think the rightist's don't?

I don't. I can only speak for myself. However, Conservatives aren't nearly as quick on the draw. You gotta admit that.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

And yet here we are, watching the RW attack one the most middle of the road members of the Senate.....and you, as usual, do not call out your brethren.

Greetings, Gimmesometruth. :2wave:

I thought that my post which said "both parties" would have shown that I believe both are guilty! As far as calling anybody out, I don't do that because everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Who am I to judge them right or wrong?
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

Yeah, but the Leftists sound off with a religious fanaticism.
Seriously? You believe religious fanaticism ....is a stronger trait....of the left?
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

I did not say they did not, but as I just posted, they also printed DeBerry's article of support for the Senator.

Uh, they have not reversed their endorsement for the Senator.

1) that article was before she shot her dumbass mouth off.

2) in effect, they dumped her, when they allowed Varney to write his piece for their loyal readers to think about all weekend.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

Seriously? You believe religious fanaticism ....is a stronger trait....of the left?

When it comes to Liberalism, yes. Liberalism is a religion to Leftists.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

____

Well lets face reality, Senator Landrieu's comments were right on target. When Blacks finally got the vote in 1964, Whites in the South which was predominantly Democratic, left to join the Republican Party. Members of the rightwing GOP have used posters at Republican rallies referring to Obama as a monkey and no republican stepped in to say this is wrong. One cannot blame African Americans from running from the GOP as if the devil himself were after them. Also, since Obama is the first African American president, racism in America is at an all time high....it is fear from Whites that they are losing the upper hand. The Tea Party came into focus because they were so against this president. Mitch McConnell, Kentucky, Senate Minority leader, said on Obama's first Inauguration eve that he and his party would do everything in their power to make sure Obama failed. If the President of the United States fail, then the American people will fail. There is gridlock in the senate because these Republicans simply hate the African American president because he is black.

Fortunately for President Obama, the US consists of more than just white men/women; it was Latinos, Gays, Liberals, Independents, College students, Asians, moderates and African Americans who placed him in office the second time.
By the year 2040 the changing demographic (Latinos) in America will alter drastically the voting pattern of the US
.



When the massive demographic change that is hurting the GOP right now hits full force like a tidal wave in about 30 years the GOP will be reduced to a small, regional party.

Don't take my word for this-wait and see what happens.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

When the massive demographic change that is hurting the GOP right now hits full force like a tidal wave in about 30 years the GOP will be reduced to a small, regional party.

Don't take my word for this-wait and see what happens.

That's when America's demise will begin. It'll be a shame. The greatest nation in history flushed down the toilet, just like that.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

____

Well lets face reality, Senator Landrieu's comments were right on target. When Blacks finally got the vote in 1964, Whites in the South which was predominantly Democratic, left to join the Republican Party. Members of the rightwing GOP have used posters at Republican rallies referring to Obama as a monkey and no republican stepped in to say this is wrong. One cannot blame African Americans from running from the GOP as if the devil himself were after them. Also, since Obama is the first African American president, racism in America is at an all time high....it is fear from Whites that they are losing the upper hand. The Tea Party came into focus because they were so against this president. Mitch McConnell, Kentucky, Senate Minority leader, said on Obama's first Inauguration eve that he and his party would do everything in their power to make sure Obama failed. If the President of the United States fail, then the American people will fail. There is gridlock in the senate because these Republicans simply hate the African American president because he is black.

Fortunately for President Obama, the US consists of more than just white men/women; it was Latinos, Gays, Liberals, Independents, College students, Asians, moderates and African Americans who placed him in office the second time. By the year 2040 the changing demographic (Latinos) in America will alter drastically the voting pattern of the US.

Gays and college students aren't white?
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

Funny, you won't show any of it though. ;)

Oh, and here's a real good example of the enlightenment of the Democrats well past the civil war, excerpted from the Democratic Party plank of 1876

Reform is necessary to correct the omissions of a Republican Congress and the errors of our treaties and our diplomacy, which has stripped our fellow-citizens of foreign birth and kindred race, re-erasing [re-crossing] the Atlantic from the shield of American citizenship, and has exposed our brethren of the Pacific coast to the incursions of a race not sprung from the same great parent stock, and in fact now by law denied citizenship through naturalization as being unaccustomed to the traditions of a progressive civilization, one exercised in liberty under equal laws; and we denounce the policy which thus discards the liberty-loving German and tolerates the revival of the coolie-trade in Mongolian women for immoral purposes, and Mongolian men held to perform servile labor contracts, and demand such modification of the treaty with the Chinese Empire, or such legislation within constitutional limitations, as shall prevent further importation or immigration of the Mongolian race.

Democratic Party Platforms: Democratic Party Platform of 1876
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

That's when America's demise will begin. It'll be a shame. The greatest nation in history flushed down the toilet, just like that.



The USA will be fine, but in 30 years the GOP will self-destruct.

No one can stop time and/or change.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

When it comes to Liberalism, yes. Liberalism is a religion to Leftists.
I'm a "leftist", "liberalism" is not a religion to me, I have no delusions making me believe that the IDEOLOGY I hold to was created by some supernatural being.

You are wrong.

QED
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

1) that article was before she shot her dumbass mouth off.
for the hard of reading, the editorial board has not reversed their endorsement.

2) in effect, they dumped her, when they allowed Varney to write his piece for their loyal readers to think about all weekend.
Again, for the hard of reading, they also published DeBerry's article in support of the Senator....for readers to think about over the weekend.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

Greetings, Gimmesometruth. :2wave:

I thought that my post which said "both parties" would have shown that I believe both are guilty! As far as calling anybody out, I don't do that because everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Who am I to judge them right or wrong?

You judge other RW posters ALL THE TIME with supporting comments, you are not unbiased and are perfectly capable of calling them out, the fact that you do not shows again your bias.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

Oh, and here's a real good example of the enlightenment of the Democrats well past the civil war, excerpted from the Democratic Party plank of 1876


silver-racial-index-7.png
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

The USA will be fine, but in 30 years the GOP will self-destruct.

No one can stop time and/or change.

The Leftists have been predicting the demise of the Gop for a long time and here they are looking at taking Congress back.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

I'm a "leftist", "liberalism" is not a religion to me, I have no delusions making me believe that the IDEOLOGY I hold to was created by some supernatural being.

You are wrong.

QED

Of course it's a religion. Obama is your messiah and the government is your church. The GOP is your boogie man.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

The Leftists have been predicting the demise of the Gop for a long time and here they are looking at taking Congress back.

The demise of one party or the other has been gone on all during my lifetime. During FDR everyone thought the Republicans were on the brink of extinction, the Eisenhower came along and viola, a vibrant Republican Party. After Goldwater's debacle, the GOP was doomed as it was again right after Watergate, but Reagan revived it a plenty. During Reagan many political books were wrote on the Republican lock on the presidency, it was thought no Democrat would ever win it again. Then came Clinton.

Political parties have the ability to adjust, also when one party overplays its hand which is inevitable, it revives the other party.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

The Leftists have been predicting the demise of the Gop for a long time and here they are looking at taking Congress back.



Tell me all about it 30 years from now.There won't be enough old white men to keep the GOP going when massive demographic change hits full force like a tidal wave.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

Of course it's a religion. Obama is your messiah and the government is your church. The GOP is your boogie man.
The fact is that RW ideology, being based on patriarchal conservative traditionalism, is at root highly religious...whereas liberalism is more associated with non-religious, inclusive, tolerant ideology.

Obama is and has been very middle of the road, has been continuing a number of Bush policies and even pushed through a Heritage/Romney health scheme...and I have been disappointed in the lack of economic initiatives from the WH.

So...no....not my messiah, I have no beliefs of gods, spaghetti or otherwise. You are wrong nearly all the time.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

Of course it's a religion. Obama is your messiah and the government is your church. The GOP is your boogie man.
And no amount of reason can sway them from their liberal dogma.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

The fact is that RW ideology, being based on patriarchal conservative traditionalism, is at root highly religious...whereas liberalism is more associated with non-religious, inclusive, tolerant ideology.

Obama is and has been very middle of the road, has been continuing a number of Bush policies and even pushed through a Heritage/Romney health scheme...and I have been disappointed in the lack of economic initiatives from the WH.

So...no....not my messiah, I have no beliefs of gods, spaghetti or otherwise. You are wrong nearly all the time.

Obama has been middle of the road? :lamo
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

And no amount of reason can sway them from their liberal dogma.
Look who is talking!

The irony is completely lost on you.
 
Re: Sen. Landrieu's remarks on race anger Republicans

The fact is that RW ideology, being based on patriarchal conservative traditionalism, is at root highly religious...whereas liberalism is more associated with non-religious, inclusive, tolerant ideology.

Obama is and has been very middle of the road, has been continuing a number of Bush policies and even pushed through a Heritage/Romney health scheme...and I have been disappointed in the lack of economic initiatives from the WH.

So...no....not ny messiah, I have no beliefs of gods, spaghetti or otherwise. You are wrong nearly all the time.
LOL Middle of the road. Only left wing extremist radicals believe that. So..
 
Back
Top Bottom